tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-43219521039284824432024-03-05T16:10:00.120-08:00Red Sticker BlogThis blog focuses on everything that would get you a red sticker. Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.comBlogger120125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-45414238716731466352018-03-07T20:26:00.001-08:002018-03-07T20:34:10.212-08:00Elisa Lam - Complete Media Overview<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiCGmxn98eYfUVvwvjQ2a09pfV29oB97_RgzCfl6ymGqbSvfUCHRmikkqE0wTMqczJsdGIpjSUkD8LH9FfGO38vZ7uu5yj3_ansjYKKcjZkHmXG5cbxvoUXckQVuO-bw7tJ65sleYm0KK09/s1600/Elisa_Lam_LAPD_flyer_photo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="350" data-original-width="285" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiCGmxn98eYfUVvwvjQ2a09pfV29oB97_RgzCfl6ymGqbSvfUCHRmikkqE0wTMqczJsdGIpjSUkD8LH9FfGO38vZ7uu5yj3_ansjYKKcjZkHmXG5cbxvoUXckQVuO-bw7tJ65sleYm0KK09/s320/Elisa_Lam_LAPD_flyer_photo.jpg" width="260" /></a></div>
<a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6a/Elisa_Lam_LAPD_flyer_photo.jpg" target="_blank">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6a/Elisa_Lam_LAPD_flyer_photo.jpg</a><br />
<br />
Elisa Lam. We’ve all heard of the tragic event. A young girl from Canada found in the water tank of the infamous Cecil Hotel in Los Angeles. This topic is buzzed about in mainstream media, and talked about by theorists, who try desperately to search her blogs and web content to solve the mystery of what happened. I’ve done the same thing, but after looking into it, I think the opposite is true. We may not be trying to find out what happened, but rather, we may be trying to find out what didn’t happen.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg3XZU4aoK4aPPdEByjxvKVW2vsBISkmxNq8xvu36g8MwC8X9KQXNMIPEXvtxXrkBaD0j2wIuxWUb3H4DgrO3tY8K-zxXG0AmJ7DjPUxpNIcsa2AArnI_xWxV7oSmBsjDaYVrGigItJJDY3/s1600/Lisa_Lamb.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" data-original-height="438" data-original-width="849" height="165" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg3XZU4aoK4aPPdEByjxvKVW2vsBISkmxNq8xvu36g8MwC8X9KQXNMIPEXvtxXrkBaD0j2wIuxWUb3H4DgrO3tY8K-zxXG0AmJ7DjPUxpNIcsa2AArnI_xWxV7oSmBsjDaYVrGigItJJDY3/s320/Lisa_Lamb.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
These two pictures appear on the web. Validity of the right most picture is hard to confirm, but lets break them down anyway. The girl on the right is brighter, more lit up naturally. Her chin is more narrow. Her mouth is thinner, and her lower lip is fatter. When comparing the photos the teeth are most striking to the eye. The girl on the left has large front teeth, while her other teeth are like little chompers. The girl on the right has extremely different teeth, with different shade. Its might not be enough, what if the right photo was never her to begin with. Lets look at the elevator photo.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIW1netjJMav552TZjbyIHWoNn786ih1PtKtbEIBaBtS5rfTEi1S7ny_V2iCFm6wQg7JIp8oV84zb7F_Pb3kCSsKvF8_eKfoeEudXy7hhyhG6PcFQwGOQ23x9czEsZRmLfHDSDpIRk7alw/s1600/Lisa_Elivator_Zoom.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" data-original-height="259" data-original-width="194" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIW1netjJMav552TZjbyIHWoNn786ih1PtKtbEIBaBtS5rfTEi1S7ny_V2iCFm6wQg7JIp8oV84zb7F_Pb3kCSsKvF8_eKfoeEudXy7hhyhG6PcFQwGOQ23x9czEsZRmLfHDSDpIRk7alw/s320/Lisa_Elivator_Zoom.jpg" width="240" /></a></div>
<br />
Even this photo, does not look like the same girl. The face is chubbier, and hard to get a positive match. Publications claim that “clothes like these.” were found in the water tank with her. What do you mean, clothes like these? They can’t make a simple ID on clothes after a couple of weeks? This should be simple.<br />
<br />
She has a blog. Nouvelle/Neveau.<br />
<a href="http://nouvelle-nouveau.tumblr.com/" target="_BLANK">http://nouvelle-nouveau.tumblr.com/</a>
<br />
<br />
Question. Why was her blog posting until December 2013? Her body was discovered in February. Mainstream has claimed que, or that her phone has been stolen. Her phone was not recovered. Okay, so deeper question. Do we believe this question cannot be answered? We know tumblr is a world class platform. I assume they clock IP addresses and likely store latest IP per post and login. Tumblr and law enforcement could EASILY find out what IP was last associated with the account, and how the posts are made. Her phone wasn't found? Well that's a no brainier. We know in 2013 EVERY phone can be traced and triangulated via many methods. They even pinpointed Toni Anderson's last phone pings near Platte Park, where she would later be found in the Missouri River. Not hard. So why is law enforcement holding back information? Simple answer, they KNOW if someone is using her phone and where it was last used? This should not be a question on Wiki as to whether or not the posts were made via que or a stolen phone. Lets just face it. They know where the phone went dead, if it's being used, and can find out exactly how blog posts are being made to her account. I'm a beginning mysql programmer, and I'm competent enough for all these things, which is why I HIGHLY question Google mysteriously not being able to keep track of simple number counts, but that's another topic.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_Bj9i2KrNJumMjQghAfH07Z0nNDTAC_4WJQcUPECv5ZA_4VgdZDSerLmkawUAnDR9B4zPrHWKBUfzMK24WULkemY_km3HVxEATVxqGtY15bt6EoNUq4oQfhkWEecuI-BeIAA2iunAIXFR/s1600/Elisa_Family.jpeg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" data-original-height="449" data-original-width="800" height="180" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_Bj9i2KrNJumMjQghAfH07Z0nNDTAC_4WJQcUPECv5ZA_4VgdZDSerLmkawUAnDR9B4zPrHWKBUfzMK24WULkemY_km3HVxEATVxqGtY15bt6EoNUq4oQfhkWEecuI-BeIAA2iunAIXFR/s320/Elisa_Family.jpeg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/autopsy-performed-on-elisa-lam-provides-no-answers-1.1165492" target="_BLANK">https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/autopsy-performed-on-elisa-lam-provides-no-answers-1.1165492</a><br />
<br />
Where is her family? Elisa apparently has a father, mother, and sister. David and Yinna Lam are parents, while Sarah Lam is her sister. No searches bring up a picture of David that I could find, but the image above shows mother and sister according to CTV news. The sister gets suspicious, at least in my own opinion.<br />
We hear of a court case but no proof it ever took place. No news videos of mother or father talking about their allegations against Cecil Hotel? The parents are silent. They don’t exist, aside from a couple of pictures, and a few mainstream media mentions, it seems they don’t exist. Do they exist?<br />
What substantiates any of them exist? While, oddly, the answer is not much.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHkSq1xHjzxfg_r0SQ-v01RAZ4ZxYaQ7vn6hxgC-eCgk13rMAt9g1iJmB-xS03tnbdCRh3irmAvC_5LFjD3bKU5NxwrIKVnhBHHZygj4FpEggYgBGSKOUeCuxIk6VQvOaT2HIq8Nko9PFx/s1600/Alex_Reista_Post.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" data-original-height="374" data-original-width="627" height="238" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHkSq1xHjzxfg_r0SQ-v01RAZ4ZxYaQ7vn6hxgC-eCgk13rMAt9g1iJmB-xS03tnbdCRh3irmAvC_5LFjD3bKU5NxwrIKVnhBHHZygj4FpEggYgBGSKOUeCuxIk6VQvOaT2HIq8Nko9PFx/s400/Alex_Reista_Post.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
We have a claim of Alex Ristea knowing Elisa, but the only place he is mentioned is mainstream news, all showing the same quote. A man with the same name shared a post on her. He has very psychotic eyes, just saying, maybe find out where he was that month.<br />
<br />
He reviews fiction. A literature buff. I wonder if fiction is a key word here. If this is what I’m beginning to think it could be, than this would make a lot of sense. There are symbols and signs at every corner, notes hidden in the art.<br />
<br />
University of British Columbia spokesman Randy Schmidt confirmed that Lam had attended summer school at the university, but was not enrolled that year. Strange, Wiki claims she is/was a student that year. She was dropping classes, so obviously, there are problems getting the facts straight. That could just be Wiki, although we know Wiki is controlled. Try editing something substantial with truth. Anything relevant will not be accepted. The truth will vanish.<br />
<br />
Proof? Prove it to yourself.<br />
<br />
Adam Wieshaupt, founder of Illuminati. The Wiki page states "It's unlikely Illuminati influence continued after his exile." Check the dates of his books, most written during his exile. Dare you to update his page to say, "Since most of his books were written in exile, it's unlikely to believe some Illuminati influence hasn't been precipitated after his exile." What do you think happens?<br />
<br />
Okay, but what about Randy Schmidt. Acting as university spokesperson he claims Elisa Lam existed and was there for a summer course, although the claim of her not having courses that year contradicts Wiki. Same here, Schmidt's comment is only confirmed by mainstream media. Would be nice to see a post made by Schmidt, but I cannot claim it doesn't exist. One video on all YouTube suggests a Randy Schmidt exists at UBC. A senior editor, it calls him. I have no idea how universities work, but why is the news department acting as a spokesperson as to whether or not someone took a class at the school?
<br />
<br />
Sarah Lam, another confirmed witness with seemingly no history. The sister of alleged Elisa Lam. A Twitter account shows up under her name. We can all make those. Fake subscribers to make it look bloated are a dime a dozen, well 10,000 for $10 really. There's a website. Sarah Lam Beauty. Her sister is a cosmetic expert. Search Sarah Lam on YouTube. Is it odd nearly a dozen accounts pop up immediately, but none are her? All of them Asian, with under 5 subscribers, most with 1 video? For me, the first is an all seeing eye profile pic. Designed results? I feel strangely like I'm facing a bunch of sock puppet accounts. 1 subscriber 1 video. What the heck, twilight zone?<br />
<br />
Look at the "about page" on her site:<a href="https://www.sarahlambeauty.com/about/" target="_BLANK">https://www.sarahlambeauty.com/about/</a><br />
<br />
Is that big chick her, the one doing the makeup? But, wait a minute, that doesn't match the profile pic on the Twitter. At all. It doesn’t even match the photo of her with her mother Yinna. Check the image title on her about page. Sarah+Lam+Makeup+Coverimage.<br />
<br />
Her portfolio is extensive, looks like she should be famous, well known for makeup. Or is it fake? Can her name be found associated with any of the wedding shows she is claimed to have participated in? A quick Google search doesn't show any listings in meta data.<br />
<br />
Google search the company. Sarah Lam Beauty. By the fourth page all information obscures into oblivion. Where does it initially exist? Nowhere apparently. The company website itself, and a few websites anyone can sign up on to promote their company. Yelps. Etsy. Ect.<br />
<br />
One website claims to have made her business cards. Real deal, or attempt to make sock puppet accounts look real? Obviously you need something to pull of a psyop. A psyop wouldn’t be a psyop without a few believable cherries on top. Well, if you're brave, there's a number on the card. One call may or may not crack the case.<br />
<a href="http://www.isalau.com/sarahlambeauty.php" target="_BLANK">http://www.isalau.com/sarahlambeauty.php</a><br />
<br />
Google the phone number. Largely un-unused, not even a page in the results linking it to Sarah Lam, not even the page comes up with the business card<br />
.<br />
The following video must prove something has happened, right? Someone filed a lawsuit:
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZLwgxn9Hf8" target="_BLANK">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZLwgxn9Hf8</a><br />
<br />
The lawsuit is filed over taste of water. Was this taste really attributed to a body, or was something put in the tank to produce a rancid taste? Was there even a lawsuit? Don't even know those people.<br />
Okay, so back to Sarah’s site. Check out the portfolio section. Her photos are professional quality. She has wedding photos, some with 20 some girls in it. Apparently she has done makeup for shows. What are the odds this company would be so obscure?<br />
<br />
They link her Instagram on site: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/sarahlambeauty/" target="_BLANK">https://www.instagram.com/sarahlambeauty/</a><br />
<br />
Hm, another profile image, interesting, this seems to be the 3rd Sarah Lam profile pic, with yet another Asian chick. How many Sarah Lams are there? Can I prove it? No, but my eyes are telling me these are different girls. Again, this is my own opinion based on exploration.<br />
<br />
Pinterest? Sure thing: <a href="https://www.pinterest.ca/sarahlambeauty/" target="_BLANK">https://www.pinterest.ca/sarahlambeauty/</a><br />
<br />
Hm, no profile picture. That's professional. What's the odds of that? Prestigious profile that might make hopeful vogue beauticians jealous, but no profile on Pinterest. For a makeup artist, looking for fame, yet having a large portfolio, I'm finding this odd. Where's her YouTube account? Where's her personal makeup tips videos? Where's her videos period? Where's her photos? No photo of herself other than Twitter profile and Instagram profile and they don't even match in my opinion!<br />
<br />
Lets get nitty gritty on website design.<br />
<br />
She has a blog: <a href="https://www.sarahlambeauty.com/blog/" target="_BLANK">https://www.sarahlambeauty.com/blog/</a><br />
<br />
One entry, with 2 comments. This is the page it goes to when you click the entry.<br />
<a href="https://www.sarahlambeauty.com/blog/2016/12/29/getting-ready-for-your-big-day#comments-outer-wrapper" target="_BLANK">https://www.sarahlambeauty.com/blog/2016/12/29/getting-ready-for-your-big-day#comments-outer-wrapper</a><br />
<br />
Wow, 2 comments that do NOT exist. Even the code is fake. How do I know? I can code. Look at the HTML for the link that should go to the comments.
<xmp>
<br />
<pre><a class="entry-comments"
href="https://www.blogger.com/blog/2016/12/29/getting-ready-for-your-big-day#comments-outer-wrapper"
title="Comments">
2 Comments
</a>
</pre>
</xmp>
<br />
The link goes to a fake anchor on the same page, not to comments. Not even to a different page.<br /><br>
I'm ready to throw in the towel on this one. I'm almost 100% set on saying this event does NOT exist in reality. It seems it only exists in the mind we call mainstream media. This has been expressed before, but make your own decisions. This is only flesh deep research and a personal opinion. I don't think these guys care about getting caught.<br /><br>
What is the reason? I don't know. If it really is a conspiracy there has been one good explanation: a possible cover up for a biological attack on Skid Row/LA. There was a tuberculosis outbreak and extremely odd, is the fact that a test kid released around the same time has been named LAM-ELISA.<br /><br>
Are there other good reasons? Well, if we're dealing with higher powers who knows what they're thinking, right? Sell movies, make media, test their influence, ect, ect. Power rituals, the list goes on. We'll never know in this life. If it's a fake event, they're not sending out the memo. You just have to figure it out.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-30989141437772968092017-10-02T20:54:00.002-07:002017-10-02T20:54:46.240-07:00Weather Modification: The Real KindSorry for the previous blunder, and I do apologize. I totally tricked myself. Hey, it happens. The tinfoil hat WILL play tricks on you. However, the show must go on. I've gathered some information about weather modification. Not the kind developed on the moon with secret black ops technology. The kind developed here on earth and admitted to by the government.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tjUiTJiiUBw/0.jpg" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tjUiTJiiUBw?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<br />
Be careful about some of the messages in the video above. I'll admit that it's a bit wonky, but you will see the government admitting fully to using HARP to mess with the ionosphere.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SDDPyZKfSYA/0.jpg" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/SDDPyZKfSYA?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<br />
Not sure about HAARP controlling recent hurricanes, but the video above explains ELF waves ability to steer hurricanes.<br />
<br />
Feel free to learn more by researching HAARP, weather engineering, and ionosphere manipulation by searching YouTube.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-20961055371698645952017-04-21T10:56:00.000-07:002017-04-26T16:59:19.026-07:00Toni Anderson - Boat Ramp TheoryWe're going to take a look at the pros and cons of the police's initial boat ramp theory, and see if it can logically work out. This is also the theory her parents seemed to have accepted the most, considering their media appearances. I crunched some numbers, and checked out the weather. It can work, in the purest scientific sense, but by the end of this article it will seem a lot less likely.<br />
<br />
The following are stats from the time frame and according to needed science.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Time Frame Stats</b><br />
Current: 7mph or 3 meters per second.<br />
Average sink time: 30 seconds to 2 minutes<br />
Possible sink time travel: 90 meters to 360 meters.<br />
Car window: Down<br />
Seat belt: Off. <br />
<br />
The river was flowing 7 miles per hour, or 3 meters per second. The average car sinks in 20 seconds to 2 minutes. A car can travel about 90 meters to 360 meters in this amount of time on 3 meter per second currents. Ms Anderson had 30 seconds to 40 seconds to escape her car according to pure science. However, for the record, pure science is not how life works, ever.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj8yblDs5XIYQrFLsx6Zw1nh1rTtbXh8_ABde-6j7Nj6_oplJnjGAdUWJcAgA7Z62ZQpJQzUG_jmv5sSOJ4pJTFTAxiWKVLvjvonv1LnAzRKLaxaF0gQWdgb_9iSkBqjyzF1FfyLA9gxXpy/s1600/boat_ramp_theory.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="268" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj8yblDs5XIYQrFLsx6Zw1nh1rTtbXh8_ABde-6j7Nj6_oplJnjGAdUWJcAgA7Z62ZQpJQzUG_jmv5sSOJ4pJTFTAxiWKVLvjvonv1LnAzRKLaxaF0gQWdgb_9iSkBqjyzF1FfyLA9gxXpy/s400/boat_ramp_theory.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
The following is an image of Platte. There are two yellow pins. The first is where the the car allegedly entered at the boat ramp and the second is where the car was retrieved from the water. The yellow line is the full possible 2 minute travel distance of about 360-380 meters. We see that a car moving without resistance could travel quite a distance. This is of course, scientifically speaking only.<br />
<br />
Lets take a look at a raft in the water.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jG3NrhfhXhc/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jG3NrhfhXhc?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<b><br /></b>
The first thing to note is how shallow the water is. There is a small boat with young people in it, just off the ramp. Their paddles are still reaching bottom a couple meters meters out.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Time Stamp: 1:57</b><br />
<a href="https://youtu.be/jG3NrhfhXhc?t=117">https://youtu.be/jG3NrhfhXhc?t=117</a><b><br /></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
The second boat is notable. It's at 2:12. This boat can be seen until 2:47 where the screen transitions. In this amount of time the boat travels about 10-12 meters, verifiable by Google Earth ruler.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Time Stamp: 2:12</b><br />
<a href="https://youtu.be/jG3NrhfhXhc?t=131">https://youtu.be/jG3NrhfhXhc?t=131</a><br />
<br />
This is the minimum sink time of a car. 30 seconds. It did not travel 140 meters. 10 meters max. In the full sink time, of 2 minutes, the boat would have traveled only 40 meters. It would have taken the boat 8 minutes to get to the retrieval point.<br />
<br />
A car with window down, seat belt off? Either her car was moving break neck speeds with no resistance, or it has the longest float time of any vehicle, without filling with water.<br />
<br />
Now that this is cleared, lets be honest. What are the chances Toni's car broke records, and nestled up against a black SUV? Or is it more likely that she ended up in someone's dump site, be that a law enforcement officer, or not?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-62814479396229385662017-04-17T05:26:00.002-07:002017-05-10T01:47:54.821-07:00Toni Anderson - Lies and Misinformation<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://m.elitestatic.com/m/57b8ca77547c899a/Toni-Anderson-missing-car.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="160" src="https://m.elitestatic.com/m/57b8ca77547c899a/Toni-Anderson-missing-car.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
I've decided to create a second blog about the Toni Anderson case, because I simply can't believe the amount of injustice perpetrated by the North Kansas City Police Department. It's important the world hear about their absolute lack of integrity, and how this poor girl's case was treated. There's too much ignorance to ignore.<br />
<br />
Toni Anderson went missing on <span class="st">January 15th, 2017. Her car was recovered 140 meters east of Platte Park Boat Landing in the </span><span class="st">Missouri River. Team Watters Sonar, reached out to the Anderson family, and ended up locating her car, along with a black SUV in The Missouri River. Police say the SUV is unrelated, but we'll never know.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="st"> <b>The Injustice</b></span><br />
<span class="st"><b><br /></b></span>
<span class="st">The following is an outline of all the injustices we could find. It seems that each media installment came with a lie. We'll cover them below.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="st"><b><i>Initial Stop</i></b></span><br />
<br />
<span class="st">Police had initially denied Toni Anderson was pulled over, but have admitted
she was stopped by a North Kansas City officer that night.</span><span class="st"> </span><br />
<br />
<span class="st"><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4304008/Body-missing-woman-Toni-Anderson-s-car.html" target="_blank">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4304008/Body-missing-woman-Toni-Anderson-s-car.html </a></span><br />
<span class="st"><br /></span>
<b><span class="st"><i>Video Footage</i></span></b><br />
<span class="st"><i> </i></span><span class="st"></span><span class="st"><i> </i></span><br />
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
In the following video the examiner mentions the officer pulling up behind Ms Anderson during the police stop over her “improper lane change.” She is issued a warning. </div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
The most important statement in the video, at the following link, is that she pulls
away from the gas station alone.</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<a href="http://fox4kc.com/2017/01/20/friends-of-toni-anderson-searching-for-clues-in-her-disappearance-near-gas-station-she-was-last-seen/">http://fox4kc.com/2017/01/20/friends-of-toni-anderson-searching-for-clues-in-her-disappearance-near-gas-station-she-was-last-seen/</a></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
Police contradict this in the following video.</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
In a Crime Watch Daily video we're told Toni Anderson was followed by
the police vehicle when she left the gas station.</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gGMFd5OFij4/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gGMFd5OFij4?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<i>Time Stamped Link</i></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGMFd5OFij4&t=152s">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGMFd5OFij4&t=152s</a></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<b><i>GPS Tracking
Lie</i></b></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">
“Kansas City police say the GPS
tracking device installed in Toni's car has not helped in the search.
Officers say the device tracks the car's speed, not its location. <b>”</b></div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
- KWCH12</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
Interesting, so it's a Global Positioning System that doesn't know how to do it's job. Sure. </div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<a href="http://www.kwch.com/content/news/KC-police-search-for-missing-Wichita-woman-411018955.html">http://www.kwch.com/content/news/KC-police-search-for-missing-Wichita-woman-411018955.html</a> </div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
This lie from police is contradicted in the same Crime Watch Daily video. The officer states the GPS pinged its last ping at the gas station, where the officer watched Toni get gas. We catch them in another lie.</div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<i>Time Stamp Link</i> </div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<a href="https://youtu.be/gGMFd5OFij4?t=181s">https://youtu.be/gGMFd5OFij4?t=181s</a>
</div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<b>Hearsay</b></div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
The North Kansas City Police officer is found to have been moving in an opposite direction in "unreleased surveillance video."<b> </b></div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<b>Call To Action</b></div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
The Kansas City Police have been caught in lie after lie. The officer in question has been placed in the location of her last GPS transmission, and was seen following her up the road. She was never seen, or heard from, again. After so many lies no officer deserves to get off the hook on hearsay evidence alone. There is too much room for corruption.</div>
<ul>
<li>Was he a rogue cop?</li>
<li>Did a corrupt group of cops get put in charge of this case?</li>
<li>Is the current chief of the precinct trustworthy? </li>
</ul>
Message the North Kansas City Police and demand they release body cam, dash cam, and all surveillance videos pertaining to the Toni Anderson case. Also ask that they re-investigate the officer in question.<br />
<br />
NKC Police Chief<br />
<a href="mailto:sebeamer@nkc.org">sebeamer@nkc.org</a><br />
<br />
Feel free to comment, and reply. Also sharing this would be a great help. Please spread it on your FaceBook, Twitter, or Google Plus. We seek true justice for Toni Anderson, even if it means the officer can be cleared and it was an accident. If not, we need criminal charges on all officers involved in a coverup.<br />
<br />
More details on the incident at:<br />
<a href="http://redstickerblog.blogspot.com/2017/04/toni-anderson-found-in-car-every-detail.html" target="_blank">http://redstickerblog.blogspot.com/2017/04/toni-anderson-found-in-car-every-detail.html</a><br />
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-4536138454229415842017-04-14T05:29:00.001-07:002017-04-21T09:24:34.728-07:00Toni Anderson (Found In Car) Every DetailFirst I have to say this sleuthing was inspired by John Lordan, who does some pretty good work when it comes to covering stories. He has a series known as BrainScratch. John covered Ms. Anderson's case in good detail, sparking my interest. Thank you John, for your amazing work. We may not always see eye to eye on theories, but I appreciate what he puts into his series.<br />
<br />
I also came across a blog that implemented cops in this case, and thought the writer was being awful at times. He did a lot of conspiracy, with what seemed like no verifiable facts. He was put off from the shunning of the Anderson family, but I urgently want to say, as a conspiracy person myself, that sometimes, some of these people's hearts are in the right place. Please consider the following information, as a more, humane, and suitable source. This was not written without care for the case, and for justice.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/toni-anderson-1.jpg?quality=65&strip=all&strip=all" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/toni-anderson-1.jpg?quality=65&strip=all&strip=all" width="240" /></a></div>
<a href="https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/toni-anderson-1.jpg?quality=65&strip=all&strip=all">https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/toni-anderson-1.jpg?quality=65&strip=all&strip=all</a> <br />
<br />
Ms. Anderson, a 20 year old hostess at Chrome, had finished work in Kansas City, Missouri, Around 4am on January 15th. She was driving to meet friends, possibly a man, as sources say. During the short trip she was stopped by highway patrol, which seemed to be somewhat of a frequent occurrence for Ms Anderson.<br />
<br />
Roxanne Townsend, one of her good friends received an SMS text, from her phone, at 4:42am.<br />
<br />
“Omg just just pulled over again”<br />
<br />
Oddly, Kansas City Police Department (KCPD) denied Ms. Anderson had been stopped by one of its officers. <br />
<br />
Some speculate she had been kidnapped and murdered by police, or somebody impersonating an officer. Personally, I'm wondering if she wasn't murdered by a police officer myself.<br />
<br />
Eventually a highway patrol officer came forward from North City Kansas Police, saying he had pulled over Ms. Anderson in a black 2014 Ford Focus, on the 9-Highway, after an "improper lane change."<br />
<br />
Ms Anderson's text:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/toni-anderson-text.jpg?quality=65&strip=all&strip=all" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="296" src="https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/toni-anderson-text.jpg?quality=65&strip=all&strip=all" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
From there, one story states, she ended up at a boat launch at Platte Landing Park, on the Missouri River. Her mother thinks she was in a tizzy after being pulled over. This seems a bit of an over reaction for a simple stop with a warning, especially for someone who had been stopped before. Police think she somehow accidentally slid down the ramp. This seems harmless enough, and completely possible. Accidents happen, we all know this to be true, but was it an accident? The story seems much darker.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.kansascity.com/latest-news/qs6p35-Toni-031317-JAT-028F.JPG/alternates/LANDSCAPE_768/Toni%20031317%20JAT%20028F.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.kansascity.com/latest-news/qs6p35-Toni-031317-JAT-028F.JPG/alternates/LANDSCAPE_768/Toni%20031317%20JAT%20028F.JPG" height="248" width="400" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.kansascity.com/latest-news/qs6p35-Toni-031317-JAT-028F.JPG/alternates/LANDSCAPE_768/Toni%20031317%20JAT%20028F.JPG">http://www.kansascity.com/latest-news/qs6p35-Toni-031317-JAT-028F.JPG/alternates/LANDSCAPE_768/Toni%20031317%20JAT%20028F.JPG</a><br />
<br />
The image above shows how long the boat launch is. A car would roll down this very slowly. A quick thinker would be able to put their car in the reverse gear and floor it. Was the grip visible that night, was there ice? The car could have been going so slow when it hit the water that it could have hung on the lip of the bank.This is just speculation.<br />
<br />
Not only is Platte not in the direction she told the officer she was
going, she was completely out of the way. Nowhere near where she should
have been to get to any known destination, according to currently
released information. There is no explanation given for Ms. Anderson
traveling down this side road. Why was she even there?<br />
<br />
When the car was retrieved, it was not near the ramp. Rather, 140 meters down river. This can be verified with Google Earth, including the direction of flow, considering sea level.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhxJsZcuAlgER1Sxab6S605L4MWSKgqI6wLCC14pTh_5-jJgjuSJlbm4Yh7DCAai6r888UJTF827Ya0SER9m-2EDdLPe5LS6SNetTD-oBcLQ4NKCON8H5st9WFxSYOoN-02FEZ3_cE9ixGk/s1600/Arial_Retreival_Point.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="290" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhxJsZcuAlgER1Sxab6S605L4MWSKgqI6wLCC14pTh_5-jJgjuSJlbm4Yh7DCAai6r888UJTF827Ya0SER9m-2EDdLPe5LS6SNetTD-oBcLQ4NKCON8H5st9WFxSYOoN-02FEZ3_cE9ixGk/s400/Arial_Retreival_Point.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
The map above shows the boat launch to the left. The retrieval point to the east, south of the circular area to the north. The circular area is only marked as a reference. Many were confused about the retrieval area, but I was able to pinpoint the exact location through source referencing. Lets dig a little deeper, to show you I know what I'm talking about.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEju8YcP6-c5rx9WAr3fOOZhBXCJTaXQtGU3kY8Uv5hilKjP995a83YAKHOUgey6o3rW06nWNYaOersa14ZjNKldpBk8IVqSagr4m-S247LqIzneU4pC9hNc3fqYaP8YmtZsD3ejNq64wrlF/s1600/ToniAnderson_retrieval_Point_Noted.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="228" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEju8YcP6-c5rx9WAr3fOOZhBXCJTaXQtGU3kY8Uv5hilKjP995a83YAKHOUgey6o3rW06nWNYaOersa14ZjNKldpBk8IVqSagr4m-S247LqIzneU4pC9hNc3fqYaP8YmtZsD3ejNq64wrlF/s400/ToniAnderson_retrieval_Point_Noted.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
As you can tell, my reference can't be off by more than a few meters.<br />
<br />
A black SUV was pulled out of the same location by police on the same day, before Ms. Anderson's car was located by a privately hired sonar team. There is total silence on the SUV. They have not said if a body was found in it, who it belonged to, or released any other media coverage on it. All they said was they believed it was unrelated. It's really hard to say if this is a dumping site for someone, but it's very odd. I'd also like to note that dumping and empty SUV near a crime scene is a very, very, clever way of confusing an investigation.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/H9c18l5HiUE/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H9c18l5HiUE?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
<br />
"Dennis Watters of Watters Sonar & Recovery said divers were looking in the area where they found Anderson's car because it was near where her phone last pinged. They had to bring professional divers out to the site because of how strong the current is. Watters also said Anderson's car was found upright underwater."<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.kshb.com/news/local-news/suv-pulled-out-of-missouri-river-kcpd-says-its-not-connected-to-any-investigation">http://www.kshb.com/news/local-news/suv-pulled-out-of-missouri-river-kcpd-says-its-not-connected-to-any-investigation</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://hips.htvapps.com/vidthumb/6eb8f896-7126-45a9-a354-3a63b91dba53/6eb8f896-7126-45a9-a354-3a63b91dba53_image.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="225" src="https://hips.htvapps.com/vidthumb/6eb8f896-7126-45a9-a354-3a63b91dba53/6eb8f896-7126-45a9-a354-3a63b91dba53_image.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
The car is badly damaged for being found upright. If the car was upright in the water, and entered from the boat launch, that means it likely drifted, and landed on its wheels. I'm not sure how the car could receive so much damage from such a light entrance. It had to be caused from retrieval, or during her trip into the water. Only one of these can be true, and someone should find out. A trip down the embankment, rather than the boat launch, can only result a few ways. She had an accident, and rolled down the embankment, she was ran off the road, her car was pushed in some way, or she drove off.<br />
<br />
Her boyfriend has expressed skepticism of some kind.<br />
<br />
"It's just too easy for someone to get rid of a car, it's 24/7 all access and there's no gate covering it," Sanchez said, describing a boat landing dock not far from where Anderson's car was found."<br />
<br />
<a href="http://fox4kc.com/2017/03/13/toni-andersons-boyfriend-grieves-her-loss-casts-skepticism-on-investigation-into-her-disappearance/" target="_blank">http://fox4kc.com/2017/03/13/toni-andersons-boyfriend-grieves-her-loss-casts-skepticism-on-investigation-into-her-disappearance/</a><br />
<br />
The video below gives circumstantial evidence that the officer did not point her towards a gas station, but followed her there, and was there when she pumped gas.<br />
<br />
(Video can only be viewed on YouTube) <br />
<a href="https://youtu.be/gGMFd5OFij4?t=141">https://youtu.be/gGMFd5OFij4?t=141</a><br />
<br />
The surveillance video shows the police officer waiting there while she fills up. The officer didn't tell her she could go get gas, according to Crime Watch, the cop was THERE when the GPS was turned off.<br />
<br />
"I know that when she started the car the GPS was no longer transmitting."<br />
<br />
<a href="https://youtu.be/gGMFd5OFij4?t=200">https://youtu.be/gGMFd5OFij4?t=200</a><br />
<br />
Someone needs to find out if he knows for a fact the GPS stopped working before, or after she came back.This is information they have such simple access to. I'm going to tell you right now, they know for a fact, and possibly to the millisecond, when that GPS shut off.<br />
<br />
"GPS tracking: The device fits into the vehicle and captures the GPS location information apart from other vehicle information at regular intervals to a central server. Other vehicle information can include fuel amount, engine temperature, altitude, reverse geocoding, door open/close, tire pressure, cut off fuel, turn off ignition, turn on headlight, turn on taillight, battery status, GSM area code/cell code decoded, number of GPS satellites in view, glass open/close, fuel amount, emergency button status, cumulative idling, computed odometer, engine RPM, throttle position, GPRS status and a lot more. Capability of these devices actually decide the final capability of the whole tracking system; most vehicle tracking systems, in addition to providing the vehicle's location data, feature a wide range of communication ports that can be used to integrate other on board systems, allowing to check their status and control or automate their operation."<br />
<br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_tracking_system">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_tracking_system</a><br />
<br />
From Ford, the maker of Ms Anderson's brand:<br />
<br />
"Ford's global vice president of marketing and sales, Jim Farley, said that the No. 2 U.S. automaker knows "everyone who breaks the law, we know when you're doing it. We have GPS in your car, so we know what you're doing," according to the report. "By the way, we don't supply that data to anyone."<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/2014/01/09/ford-we-can-use-gps-to-track-your-car-movements.html">http://www.cnbc.com/2014/01/09/ford-we-can-use-gps-to-track-your-car-movements.html</a><br />
<br />
Note - how can they know if you're breaking the law? Unless he's over bragging the product, that sounds like audio and video included. Someone should find out.<br />
<br />
<b>Even Deeper</b><br />
<br />
A glimpse into ready buyable GPS trackers.<b> </b><br />
<b><br /></b>"Super Trackstick is designed to be concealed inside of the vehicle, allowing you to record the complete travel activities of your vehicle... anywhere... anytime. Automatically keep track of your vehicle including it's location, stops, length of stop, miles driven, speed, and more."<br />
<b> </b><br />
<b> </b><br />
<ul class="a-unordered-list a-vertical a-spacing-none">
<li><span class="a-list-item">
View maps and reports. Street level mapping
</span></li>
</ul>
<b><a href="https://www.amazon.ca/TrackStick-Vehicle-Tracking-System-Logger/dp/B000RBH1B8" target="_blank">https://www.amazon.ca/TrackStick-Vehicle-Tracking-System-Logger/dp/B000RBH1B8</a></b><br />
<br />
<b> An example of data</b><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.bluewatersecurityprofessionals.com/super%20trackstick.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.bluewatersecurityprofessionals.com/super%20trackstick.jpg" height="300" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<a href="http://www.bluewatersecurityprofessionals.com/super%20trackstick.jpg" target="_blank"> http://www.bluewatersecurityprofessionals.com/super%20trackstick.jpg</a><br />
<br />
Ford has installed a sophisticated devices into Toni Anderson's car. Police are not being honest. I'm not sure if media would help cover up a crime or not. In this world, it really depends on who, and why. The police know everything, including times. They could match the times from the GPS, check the times with the ATM clock, and they know to the second when this GPS stopped. They could EASILY find out if it was while she was in the store or not. And more importantly, while he was watching her fill up.<br />
<br />
If they are hiding something for the officer that pulled her over, someone should dig a little deeper. This family, if this case goes this empty, needs to open a law suit. They deserve the truth, the full truth, as does all that seek justice in this case. Toni Anderson deserves to have the truth brought to light.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-39216937892794063792017-01-14T10:37:00.002-08:002017-01-14T10:37:31.904-08:00Mars Hoax<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/01ji0RWsM88/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/01ji0RWsM88?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
The video above shows some interesting information, and alleges fake NASA activity in Devon Island, Nunavut, Canada.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gQKnUJTQicA/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gQKnUJTQicA?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-3804593678002134902017-01-14T04:01:00.001-08:002017-01-14T04:01:57.344-08:00Hubble - Fake Mars <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://media.stsci.edu/uploads/image/banner_image/3733/low_banner-2016-15-a_2x.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="95" src="https://media.stsci.edu/uploads/image/banner_image/3733/low_banner-2016-15-a_2x.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
That's an image of Mars from Hubble. Notice the snow. Mars apparently has a permanent carbon dioxide cap on the south pole. Whatever that looks like.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://media.stsci.edu/uploads/image/display_image/2225/low_large_web.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="180" src="https://media.stsci.edu/uploads/image/display_image/2225/low_large_web.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Of course I don't see much of a cap on this image from Hubble.<br />
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://media.stsci.edu/uploads/image/display_image/1811/low_full_jpg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="180" src="https://media.stsci.edu/uploads/image/display_image/1811/low_full_jpg.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
It's really snowy in that picture. That's the best one yet. In fact, I think that's the most snow Mars had in decades of Hubble history.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Yeah, apparently Mars has a massive crater on the northern pole, called Planum Boreum. You wouldn't know it from looking at some images.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Mars_NPArea-PIA00161.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Mars_NPArea-PIA00161.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
There it is. Thanks Wiki.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planum_Boreum">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planum_Boreum</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://media.stsci.edu/uploads/image/display_image/839/low_full_jpg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="180" src="https://media.stsci.edu/uploads/image/display_image/839/low_full_jpg.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
There it is. It's really visible in 1999.<br />
<br />
Last I checked rock and sand couldn't create precipitation for snow.<br />
<br />
I have this feeling EVERY Mars image on the Hubble website is 3D.<br />
<br />
A giant telescope can't take one real image?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://hubblesite.org/images/news/62" target="_blank">http://hubblesite.org/images/news/62</a> Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-9156005798489236522017-01-13T17:50:00.003-08:002017-01-13T17:54:51.741-08:00Rockets In Space<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://images2.alphacoders.com/842/84240.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="250" src="https://images2.alphacoders.com/842/84240.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Will rockets work in space? That is the question.<br />
<br />
Many people have been trying to prove that rockets will not work in space. The argument is back and forth, on the premise of whether or not rocket engines need atmosphere to create the needed thrust.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fA9XGsvAKbw/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fA9XGsvAKbw?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
The video above shows us that helicopters will most certainly not work in space. Since there is no air, there can be no lift.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cfFJImcFx3s/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cfFJImcFx3s?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
Although rocket engines are said to work differently, the video above suggests atmosphere is still needed.<br />
<br />
Argument: The engine combustion pushes on the inside of the engine, pushing the rocket forward, no atmosphere needed.<br />
<br />
The problem is. When you put a vacuum cleaner at the end of the straw, and take away the air, and out flowing energy, there is little to no movement. Also the paper taped on back causes problems.<br />
<br />
If space sucks up the energy and out flowing thrust in all directions, and acts like a massive paper taped to the end of the rocket, will rockets fail in space?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-89175501347092422502017-01-11T19:29:00.003-08:002017-01-11T19:29:53.288-08:00Dinosaur Installation <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/HhDkTXYt6z0/0.jpg" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HhDkTXYt6z0?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<br />
One of the best alleged dinosaur fake videos yet. Check out one company responsible for installing dinosaur bones. Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-4416984598167011872017-01-11T01:12:00.001-08:002017-01-12T17:55:58.611-08:00Fake Moon Landing - Waving Flag<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ymwE1sNm82Y?t=145" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
The video above is being posted as alleged proof for a fake moon landing. An easily spotted discrepancy will come just after an astronaut jogs by the flag from the left side of the screen. The flag will wave back and forth, slightly. This may seem normal at first, but you have to realize for the flag to react to someone moving passed it, there has to be air to displace. The moon has no atmosphere, and no wind. Also the vacuum of space has no air.<br />
<br />
Proof that wind will not cause reaction in a vacuum can be found in the video below.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vtJT5gFwNjg/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vtJT5gFwNjg?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
The video above shows wind from a computer fan. Once the jar reaches vacuum the ribbon will stop blowing. Also proof that no fan will ever cool a computer on a probe, lander, or any other vehicle.<br />
<br />
<b>Edit - Previous version of this blog article did not account for gravity. Please disregard comment about laws of motion. The rest remains as possible evidence.</b>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-59462357830846841022017-01-10T10:10:00.000-08:002017-01-10T10:10:58.957-08:00ISS - Eating and Drinking<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://indianapublicmedia.org/amomentofscience/files/2010/03/astronautfood.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://indianapublicmedia.org/amomentofscience/files/2010/03/astronautfood.jpg" height="213" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<a href="http://indianapublicmedia.org/amomentofscience/files/2010/03/astronautfood.jpg">http://indianapublicmedia.org/amomentofscience/files/2010/03/astronautfood.jpg</a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
The astronauts above are getting ready to eat something. They actually eat and drink often, as they need to for survival. Obviously this seems normal at first, but one really has to wonder, how is this done in a zero gravity environment? Food, water, and every other substance floats, until force is applied. <br />
<br />
The packaged answer: muscles constrict the food, pushing it down to the stomach.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/qkUBF.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/qkUBF.gif" width="121" /></a></div>
<a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/qkUBF.gif" target="_blank">https://i.stack.imgur.com/qkUBF.gif</a><br />
<br />
This process must be awfully slow. What are the chances a given bite of food will actually make it to the stomach? Now imagine a drink of water. The risk of water not stopping in the throat, back of the mouth, or at a lung opening would be very high.<br />
<br />
Last, but not least, we consider the laws of motion. A body in motion, stays in motion, unless acted upon with an equal, or opposite force.<br />
<br />
If anyone sneezed, burped, jolted, jarred, got bumped, raised upward, or got caught in any motion when the food started down their throat, they would be doomed to die. Food slowly passing down the chest cavity would start back up again, and a simple bump as strong as the force at which the spasms were working the food down, would nullify the muscle spasm starting it, and the food, into a reverse motion.<br />
<br />
I am alleging that eating in space is impossible.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-48232572350864898602017-01-09T14:37:00.002-08:002017-01-10T00:00:35.505-08:00Google Earth - Geocentric<b>Note: This thread has been debunked. The same illusion is caused by the camera following the earth during its rotation and orbit.</b><br />
<br />
This post will be reconstructed. I noticed that moving the time-of-day scrub seemed to rotate the universe. This provided evidence that Google Earth operated on a geocentric modal. Others suggested this same effect will happen when the camera follows the earth in orbit at the same speed. This is true to some extent, but only nullifies the evidence if it is the case. For that reason, I'll leave this info here.<b> </b> <br />
<br />
Above we see Africa Jan 9th, 5:28pm, 2017.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1UfZ0qB7daegn33PISPcQa1yLQHCUTm3a4vMMros2SlHtL8d9BZEdjboFSgsNREy0MgTRjrZjOPBRgTjhALMycUI4_smv43C_XCNNJGSU31RJWpJVvA9Xu6iPQdlNbKNrACtnW2dLzUTu/s1600/Africa_GoogleE_528pm_jan9_2017.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="214" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1UfZ0qB7daegn33PISPcQa1yLQHCUTm3a4vMMros2SlHtL8d9BZEdjboFSgsNREy0MgTRjrZjOPBRgTjhALMycUI4_smv43C_XCNNJGSU31RJWpJVvA9Xu6iPQdlNbKNrACtnW2dLzUTu/s320/Africa_GoogleE_528pm_jan9_2017.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Africa Jan 10th, 5:28am, 2017.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_wmSgSt-gzles2EvCYH22aZyGSLIGkFjjl_ePuIaoFh8jLp7WTV1e7_NwmTPnefPNf-INJiSL9mEbMdqh2R-1BRWc0p9WAoVNvCHdrN4IMoX_s-m3TuNPWX_nRYIl-sx113TLVkcHtvmE/s1600/Africa_GoogleE_528am_jan10_2017.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="215" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_wmSgSt-gzles2EvCYH22aZyGSLIGkFjjl_ePuIaoFh8jLp7WTV1e7_NwmTPnefPNf-INJiSL9mEbMdqh2R-1BRWc0p9WAoVNvCHdrN4IMoX_s-m3TuNPWX_nRYIl-sx113TLVkcHtvmE/s320/Africa_GoogleE_528am_jan10_2017.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
We see from night to day in Africa the sun seeming rotated to the other side.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-46252228681475717732017-01-09T11:28:00.001-08:002017-01-09T12:06:50.708-08:00Mercury and Venus Visibility Impossible<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AVRA1jWUpq4/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/AVRA1jWUpq4?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
The documentary above makes the claim that Mercury and Venus would never be visible in the Heliocentric modal. It may, or may not be, the voice of Eric Dubay. I've done a little research and found this claim invalid. I did come across something interesting, and that's what I'd like to share.<br />
<br />
We'll use Pretoria Africa as our starting point. I love Africa, because it's near the center of the globe face, and if any place could break a modal, it's Africa. It's great for this kind of scientific assessment.<br />
<br />
Sunset: 7:04PM<br />
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/south-africa/pretoria<br />
<br />
Venus Set Time: 9:46PM<br />
https://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/night/south-africa/pretoria<br />
<br />
We'll use the time 8:20PM-8:40PM. This is just after sunset, and about an hour before Venus sets.<br />
<br />
The following image is a diagram of Africa, containing a red line for field of view, and a red line to the planet. It's all crude estimates, but we're pretty close for the time.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://i.imgsafe.org/3de4545b78.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="245" src="https://i.imgsafe.org/3de4545b78.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<a href="https://i.imgsafe.org/3de4545b78.jpg" target="_blank">Enlarge</a><br />
<br />
As we can see the claim has been totally debunked, but an interesting question arises. Are they seeing the full planet, or a half lit planet? Considering the angle, only a small portion of the planet should be lit. Pretoria South Africa should pretty well be looking near the dark side of Venus on January 9th, 2017.<br />
<br />
<b>Note: Venus and other planets have phases, so the claim may be totally debunked.</b><br />
<br />
Live Chart Of Solar System:<br />
<a href="http://www.theplanetstoday.com/" target="_blank">http://www.theplanetstoday.com/</a>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-291794428131927172017-01-08T17:53:00.000-08:002017-01-08T17:56:28.189-08:00Nuclear Hoax<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/N6pzCfU5y50/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/N6pzCfU5y50?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
This video makes it into the conspiracy section of the blog, as there is a lot that needs to be verified. I would never suggest Hiroshima and Nagasaki were carpet bombed without hard evidence. I will share this, though, for entertainment value, and to clarify some possible dissinfo coming out of the establishments.<br />
<br />
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-80466090207461509292017-01-08T10:06:00.003-08:002017-01-08T10:06:54.243-08:00NASA - Hid Faked Image<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0803/iss_sts122_big.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="271" src="https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0803/iss_sts122_big.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<a href="https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0803/iss_sts122_big.jpg">https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0803/iss_sts122_big.jpg</a><br />
<br />
The above image from NASA is very interesting. Take a look at the bottom left corner. Wait, there is no bottom left corner. Interestingly enough the entire image has been removed from the archive. We'll never know what the caption said, although I thought that was the point of an archive. What does NASA have to hide?<br />
<br />
Archive here:<br />
<a href="https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html">https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html</a><br />
<br />
Search "iss_sts122_big":<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEif4J4VQW57j3R3BNTJwq2ZP0wMphgvg2mOeeqMjyFFjogeFWMT8HhPKkPmmE6Y2YB_ezd3mf2q6n_6cjZsUchgrhIcTsSH_q8jgrtcP2v_I3z7NRS1zc3d_a3CM4DD0WaLiqM_ql21eSRw/s1600/archive_search.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="105" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEif4J4VQW57j3R3BNTJwq2ZP0wMphgvg2mOeeqMjyFFjogeFWMT8HhPKkPmmE6Y2YB_ezd3mf2q6n_6cjZsUchgrhIcTsSH_q8jgrtcP2v_I3z7NRS1zc3d_a3CM4DD0WaLiqM_ql21eSRw/s400/archive_search.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
Nothing foundAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-62977751117572024662017-01-07T23:14:00.001-08:002017-01-07T23:14:52.308-08:00Stonehenge - Ancient Ritual Site or Tourism Hoax<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://cdn.history.com/sites/2/2015/04/Archaeology_Stonehenge_Corbisjpg-E.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://cdn.history.com/sites/2/2015/04/Archaeology_Stonehenge_Corbisjpg-E.jpeg" height="179" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Stonehenge is said to be an ancient monolithic structure built anywhere from 3000 to 30,000 years ago. Is it a site of ancient rituals, worship of the druids, or an elaborate hoax to kickstart an economy? Okay, so that last bit is a joke, but the idea was certainly spawned by real research.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IShGbR6dhy8/maxresdefault.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="175" src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IShGbR6dhy8/maxresdefault.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
That's Jeranism: a flat earther. He sets off my dissinfo alarm for having been on Chris Geo show, and slandering the word of God. He claims Jesus is not the messiah. If you're wondering what my beef is with Geo, we personally argued. He openly supported H.P Blavatsky, and slandered Christians by showing a crime site of Christian molesters. I made him look foolish, stating math showed those crimes are committed by 5-10% of the Christian community. He deleted comments, and heavily censored the conversation, making himself look victor. Geo is on Genesis Broadcasting, with Alex Jones. Both shills in my books.<br />
<br />
Jeranism made a video, but he swears a lot, so I'll show a similar video.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/80Ih7EskLZE/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/80Ih7EskLZE?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
Jeranism's video is very similar, except he goes as far as to say Stonehenge was built in the 50's, during the "restoration." He claims something similar about the pyramids, ignoring all ancient texts, including the old testament. Right, there's no mummies, and no literature. Fair warning.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
This video shows old photos, allegedly proving it's not fake.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oUi2WsagKoE/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/oUi2WsagKoE?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
As you can see, there's some pretty good information predating the 56 restoration.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a4/BLEgerton3028Fol30rStonehengeCropped.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a4/BLEgerton3028Fol30rStonehengeCropped.jpg" width="304" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Wikipedia</div>
<br />
Above, Merlin crafts the monument with his own hands. This is explained in our earliest known writing of Stonehenge, by Geoffrey of Monmouth, in his book ‘History of the Kings of Britain’ from 1136.<br />
<br />
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/stonehenge/history/<br />
<br />
It's admitted Roman discoveries were made around the area, as Roman empire was in Britannia as early as 55AD.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/60/All_Roman_coins_1997_-_2010_(2).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/60/All_Roman_coins_1997_-_2010_(2).jpg" width="259" /></a></div>
Above is a map of Roman coins in the area of England. Totally populated.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/staticarchive/d8b7c554fa6797bc733d185e4a20d07025e8ae54.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.bbc.co.uk/staticarchive/d8b7c554fa6797bc733d185e4a20d07025e8ae54.gif" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/staticarchive/d8b7c554fa6797bc733d185e4a20d07025e8ae54.gif" target="_blank">http://www.bbc.co.uk/staticarchive/d8b7c554fa6797bc733d185e4a20d07025e8ae54.gif</a><br />
<br />
The map above shows tribes already in the area during Roman occupation.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/55515000/jpg/_55515601_2_01_ptolemy_albion_hibernia_1654.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/55515000/jpg/_55515601_2_01_ptolemy_albion_hibernia_1654.jpg" height="225" width="400" /></a></div>
<a href="http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/55515000/jpg/_55515601_2_01_ptolemy_albion_hibernia_1654.jpg">http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/55515000/jpg/_55515601_2_01_ptolemy_albion_hibernia_1654.jpg</a><br />
<br />
We have a 2nd century Ptolemy map, but no mentions of Stonehenge until after the dark ages?<br />
<br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy</a><br />
<br />
We really have to wonder: Why was Stonehenge not mentioned until after the collapse of a major economy? It remains a tourist attraction to this day. Was that always its purpose?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-74883960924153920952017-01-07T14:45:00.001-08:002017-01-07T14:45:04.998-08:00ISS - Cupola Module<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/546166096bb3f74a5f65fca3-1200-924/9599641593_66bbd809dc_o.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/546166096bb3f74a5f65fca3-1200-924/9599641593_66bbd809dc_o.png" height="240" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
The Cupola module above is the ISS earth observatory.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://storyful.s3.amazonaws.com/production/ci_images/1697/_47254659_cupola_iss_466-original.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://storyful.s3.amazonaws.com/production/ci_images/1697/_47254659_cupola_iss_466-original.gif" width="400" /></a></div>
<a href="https://storyful.s3.amazonaws.com/production/ci_images/1697/_47254659_cupola_iss_466-original.gif">https://storyful.s3.amazonaws.com/production/ci_images/1697/_47254659_cupola_iss_466-original.gif</a><br />
<br />
Each window is no more than a few feet wide.<br />
<br />
Here's a picture of ISS above the earth:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0803/iss_sts122_big.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="217" src="https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0803/iss_sts122_big.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<a href="https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0803/iss_sts122_big.jpg">https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0803/iss_sts122_big.jpg</a><br />
One can imagine how little earth you should be able to see in a few small windows.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/iss036e0297641.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/iss036e0297641.jpg" height="212" width="320" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/iss036e0297641.jpg">http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/iss036e0297641.jpg</a><br />
<br />
Above is a normal lens shot.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/files/2010/06/soichi-cupola-earth.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/files/2010/06/soichi-cupola-earth.jpg" height="244" width="320" /></a></div>
<a href="http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/files/2010/06/soichi-cupola-earth.jpg" target="_blank">http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/files/2010/06/soichi-cupola-earth.jpg</a><br />
<br />
That is what they claim happens when a fish eye lens is placed on the Cupola. Fish eye pulls the outside towards the center. Apparently, their magic fish eye, has the ability to pull the entire land mass into a uniform globe.<br />
<br />
Yet, here is another fish eye lens image:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/624673main_cupploa_xl.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="210" src="https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/624673main_cupploa_xl.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<a href="https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/624673main_cupploa_xl.jpg">https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/624673main_cupploa_xl.jpg</a><br />
<br />
Which is totally different, including altitude.<br />
<br />
Not sure what to think of this, but having hard time agreeing with plausibility.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-62630606975002242782017-01-07T09:34:00.003-08:002017-01-07T09:34:41.545-08:00Celebrate Truth - Scientism Exposed (Documentary)<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AeIGrEtPMmE/0.jpg" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/AeIGrEtPMmE?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeIGrEtPMmE">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeIGrEtPMmE</a><br />
<br />
The above documentary is one of the best I've seen this year. It explores the topic of geocentrism, and goes head to head with the fallacy of scientism. They explore topics from the heliocentric model to evolution.<br />
<br />
I'm not sure about flat earth, but geocentric is awesome. I'm weary of certain people in this movement, for obvious reasons, but it's worth a listen. There is certainly some truth in here. Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-10758416727171224872017-01-06T05:57:00.000-08:002017-01-06T06:03:59.493-08:00ISS - Star Psyop Exposed<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/space/international_space_station/images/iss_gallery_med_02_960x600.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/space/international_space_station/images/iss_gallery_med_02_960x600.jpg" height="200" width="320" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/space/international_space_station/images/iss_gallery_med_02_960x600.jpg">http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/space/international_space_station/images/iss_gallery_med_02_960x600.jpg</a><br />
<br />
The above image is a typical day photo from the ISS. Notice the number of stars. None. Sure it makes sense for the day, but their night photos were no different.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/626033main_iss030e078095_full.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="212" src="https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/626033main_iss030e078095_full.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<a href="https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/626033main_iss030e078095_full.jpg" target="_blank">https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/626033main_iss030e078095_full.jpg</a><br />
<br />
Night photos looked like above. Hardly a star in the sky.<br />
<br />
The star issue gave truthers and theorists some leverage. We used to argue the moon photos were fake, there were never any stars.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5875HRedit.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="249" src="https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5875HRedit.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<a href="https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5875HRedit.jpg" target="_blank">https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5875HRedit.jpg</a><br />
<br />
Above we see one Apollo image, but if anyone cares to browse them all, there will be no stars.<br />
<br />
This claim of ours was allegedly debunked long ago, likely before I was here, but even I held this argument. Our opponent's theory? Something to do with exposure. That's why there are no stars. <br />
<br />
To show our readers, here are some results on Google.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.google.ca/search?site=&source=hp&q=apollo+no+stars&oq=apollo+no+stars&gs_l=hp.3..0i22i30k1l9.395.3933.0.4081.22.18.4.0.0.0.221.2038.0j12j1.13.0....0...1c.1.64.hp..5.16.1879.0..0j35i39k1j0i67k1j0i19k1j0i22i30i19k1.0bbz3od3DaM" target="_blank">No Stars Google Search</a><br />
<br />
Not only did NASA, after 30 years, and 10 years of the ISS without stars, decide they were going to turn on the stars, they put the whole Milky Way up there!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://spotthestation.nasa.gov/images/instagram_example_pic.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="321" src="https://spotthestation.nasa.gov/images/instagram_example_pic.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<a href="https://spotthestation.nasa.gov/images/instagram_example_pic.jpg">https://spotthestation.nasa.gov/images/instagram_example_pic.jpg</a><br />
<br />
That outta shut us up, eh NASA?<br />
<br />
Maybe if you didn't release a semi-recent Instagram post, of an obvious 3D video, of something played off as a real time-lapse, I would have believed them. *Snickers* Probably not.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/n_MJDL2m_8w/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/n_MJDL2m_8w?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
<a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/BD1TYZiNPh5/">https://www.instagram.com/p/BD1TYZiNPh5/</a><br />
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-44641808175979011822017-01-05T13:52:00.002-08:002017-01-05T13:53:45.962-08:00NASA - Vanguard Satellite Series<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/spacecraft/vanguard_tv3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/spacecraft/vanguard_tv3.jpg" height="320" width="309" /></a></div>
<a href="http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/spacecraft/vanguard_tv3.jpg" target="_blank">http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/spacecraft/vanguard_tv3.jpg </a><br />
<br />
Vanguard, a series of satellites tried by the United State of America. Launching started in the late 1950's. After a few years in orbit contact with the surviving Vanguard satellite was lost. Last contact: 1964.<br />
<br />
The first Vanguard launch ended in failure, when the rocket plummeted back to earth, from only several yards in the air.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JK6a6Hkp94o/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JK6a6Hkp94o?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
Exact cause of launch failure: Classified. <br />
<br />
Bell was involved with the construction of Vanguard series. Strangely, there were six vanguard satellites constructed, but we can only find fragments of information. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.ferretronix.com/march/20110501/vanguard1_3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.ferretronix.com/march/20110501/vanguard1_3.jpg" height="320" width="240" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.ferretronix.com/march/20110501/vanguard1_3.jpg">http://www.ferretronix.com/march/20110501/vanguard1_3.jpg</a><br />
<br />
The image above shows one of the Vanguards being stored on display. Click the link to enlarge, and zoom to read the plaque. It states this is meant to be the first, but couldn't due to launch failure. The plaque creates some confusing information. Is the vanguard above meant to be the Vanguard that survived the explosion?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/TV3_satellite.JPG/220px-TV3_satellite.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/TV3_satellite.JPG/220px-TV3_satellite.JPG" /></a></div>
<a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/TV3_satellite.JPG/220px-TV3_satellite.JPG" target="_blank">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/TV3_satellite.JPG/220px-TV3_satellite.JPG</a><br />
<br />
The image above is T3, which allegedly survived our explosion. Is this the same Vanguard showed above? This survived the explosion of video one? Almost as convenient as terrorist passports floating down from the twin towers. <br />
<br />
Can you believe, as Wiki states, that after explosion, this thing was emitting its signal?<br />
<br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanguard_TV3" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanguard_TV3 </a><br />
<br />
"The Vanguard satellite was thrown clear and landed on the ground a short distance away with its transmitters still sending out a beacon signal."<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DKldqeurnDY/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/DKldqeurnDY?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
The above video is interesting. At the end it makes a claim of Van Allen Belt destruction, but there's no good way to indicate which satellite, if any in the Vanguard series, he is talking about, due to the nature of editing. Also notice the noise maker he turns on. I wish we could have that analyzed by a specialist to see if it is anything more than a noise maker.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YOUk3TytcwQ/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/YOUk3TytcwQ?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
I'm going to call complete diss-info on some of the footage in the video above. Our friend here claims to be able to track the Vanguard satellite, despite the US government not being able to track our 6" friend. Notice at several points in the video the "satellite" stands still. At 2:06 it turns into a shooting star!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-74288019909283496822017-01-05T11:06:00.000-08:002017-01-05T11:06:09.386-08:00False Alien Disclosure<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7tEH2KeaUzs/0.jpg" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7tEH2KeaUzs?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<br />
The following video shares footage which only touches the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the false alien disclosures in the government. This video contains the audio of controlled agents. David Ike, and I am highly suspect of Cathy O'brien, due to the behavior of "Miller Family." I do believe their words though in this video, as controlled agents often mix truth with their messages.<br />
<br />
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-59501599415704818552017-01-04T18:01:00.001-08:002017-01-04T18:01:27.557-08:00Geocentric Lecture<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YHykDpLQelw/0.jpg" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/YHykDpLQelw?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<br />
The lecture above goes over experiments and theories during the battle of geocentrims and the invention of heliocentrism. It's quite entertaining, and lines up well with scripture. It's interesting to hear about the buried debate. There are many experiments that found Einsteins theories and other heliocentric theories to be faulty.<br />
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-17375902520422370232017-01-03T13:21:00.002-08:002017-01-06T06:12:15.218-08:00Galileo and Pioneer 10 - Satellite or Hoax <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/40/Galileo_in_1983.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/40/Galileo_in_1983.jpg" width="280" /></a></div>
<br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_(spacecraft)">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_(spacecraft)</a><br />
<br />
Galileo was one of the first unmanned satellites to be sent out into deep space. This bad boy was said to have travelled through an asteroid belt (Where asteroids are allegedly far apart), to the planet Jupiter. During its life it travelled a total of 4,631,778,000 km, reaching speeds in the excess of 80,000 m/h. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.crystalinks.com/asteroidbelt1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.crystalinks.com/asteroidbelt1.jpg" height="166" width="320" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.crystalinks.com/asteroidbelt1.jpg">http://www.crystalinks.com/asteroidbelt1.jpg</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NZYF29tpkoY/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/NZYF29tpkoY?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
"It was designed to use the gravitational force of the moons to bend the path of flight."<br />
<br />
Sure, good job on your calculations.<br />
<br />
The satellite's parachute probe will descend into Jupiter's atmosphere and send data back to the probe.<br />
<br />
Lets see how this happened.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4oDR9XRNShI/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4oDR9XRNShI?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
"NASA decided they could do one more mission."<br />
<br />
Right, go ahead and talk like they came back for a probe to drop. Just stick with the program guys.<br />
<br />
Look at how they depict the probe:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjyV4VZhN13yNX8LDDjWCiPSDDS20bw-vv6dK9iFpLVyeaN29YpaWqSrOR4H0fVSzlZnE2TQpvMDN_yH4jEMGgG08f6z_Jr0hlmdYkoObvarz69xOb4NSzE3YRZHyZzW6BwuLtdHY8zKo0f/s1600/Galileo_Probe.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="148" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjyV4VZhN13yNX8LDDjWCiPSDDS20bw-vv6dK9iFpLVyeaN29YpaWqSrOR4H0fVSzlZnE2TQpvMDN_yH4jEMGgG08f6z_Jr0hlmdYkoObvarz69xOb4NSzE3YRZHyZzW6BwuLtdHY8zKo0f/s320/Galileo_Probe.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
The actual probe:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/galprobe_sts34.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/galprobe_sts34.gif" width="273" /></a></div>
Looks like R2's head.<br />
<br />
Back to Galileo. What happened to our good friend? Well, it started losing itself to radiation problems, mechanical problems, and was running low on fuel, so our good friends at NASA decided to send it down to the same fate as the poor probe.<br />
<br />
Reason? They didn't want to crash land on Europa, due to having found strong evidence of an ocean under the moon's icy surface. Right. I don't even want to get into the ridiculous notion of taking on ISS, Mars missions, and several solar missions, over the idea of going back to see if there's a fish in that sea.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/galileo/">https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/galileo/</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/68/Pioneer_10_Construction.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/68/Pioneer_10_Construction.jpg" width="311" /></a></div>
<br />
Meet the great grand daddy. Above we see Pioneer 10! Okay, this is where things get really funny.<br />
<br />
Mission launch? March 2, 1972. Duration of the mission? 30 years, and still going!<br />
<br />
That's right Galileo, newer, better materials, built more efficiently, ran out of fuel, and suffered wear, so they crashed it. But a 30 year old hunk of junk, with dated equipment, is still going to be sending data back. After 10 BILLION Kms, carrying 70s gear, through -200 degree temperatures, or more, it's still going to send data back through its dish?<br />
<br />
Lets just get a little history on the internet, shall we?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nsdFNTeGqIg/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/nsdFNTeGqIg?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
In the 70's internet hardly existed. They were not using wireless in the beginning, they were sending data through phone lines. Later this would become known to the public as dial-up.<br />
<br />
Later they started developing a system called ALOHAnet, which is really the first wireless connections, which used high frequency. It also only connected some Hawaiian islands. Kind of brings into question how the internet really works, even today. After all, the boxes are connected to wires. The only part we know for sure, that is sending a wireless signal is the box transmitter, which is ALWAYS in close proximity. We'll save that for another post. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ske4OZqC8GQ/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ske4OZqC8GQ?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
From WIKI on Wi-Fi:<br />
<br />
In 1971, ALOHAnet connected the Hawaiian Islands with a UHF wireless packet network. ALOHAnet and the ALOHA protocol were early forerunners to Ethernet, and later the IEEE 802.11 protocols, respectively.<br />
<br />
- First high frequency tests of wireless internet.<br />
<br />
A 1985 ruling by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission released the ISM band for unlicensed use.[3] These frequency bands are the same ones used by equipment such as microwave ovens and are subject to interference.<br />
<br />
- AFTER the launch of Pioneer 10, our wonder satellite of 10 billion km data, they finally release ISM.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISM_band">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISM_band</a><br />
<br />
Basically microwave oven frequencies, that would later be adapted to the first LOW range equipment, such as blue tooth, and cell phones.<br />
<br />
Wi-fi Wiki:<br />
In 1991, NCR Corporation with AT&T Corporation invented the precursor to 802.11, intended for use in cashier systems.<br />
<br />
Pioneer 10, in the era of dial-up, when they were birthing wireless cash-register technology, was beaming data back from millions of kilometers away. All from far away planets, in an era before we were trying to figure out if our cell would get a signal over that hill! Not only that, it's STILL sending data back.<br />
<br />
I have a problem with believing this.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-22361498878648988682017-01-03T06:41:00.001-08:002017-01-03T06:41:38.485-08:00Sphere Globe Considered - No More Directional Logic<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQKQdOvfeIkzVryqttpnEw-HFw1-4W7R2sRb9wkcZGPw8ZsLtstEoWkvE5PAb2A892bmvdB0RcujeaUACSUlG-0XK431tuw7F5Wu-mIfUYGB31PNx6rJqAgKT9z1UA7yVLxn-jw26moKTf/s1600/nile.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="215" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQKQdOvfeIkzVryqttpnEw-HFw1-4W7R2sRb9wkcZGPw8ZsLtstEoWkvE5PAb2A892bmvdB0RcujeaUACSUlG-0XK431tuw7F5Wu-mIfUYGB31PNx6rJqAgKT9z1UA7yVLxn-jw26moKTf/s320/nile.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
We contemplated the Nile running north on a sphere globe. I wondered how this could be. What force is pulling it up? I bumped into the same answer, and no real reason why. Just acceptance of common logic.<br />
<br />
The answer is always the same:<br />
<a href="https://www.quora.com/Are-people-near-the-South-Pole-standing-upside-down-since-Earth-is-spheroidal-in-shape-and-we-stand-vertically">https://www.quora.com/Are-people-near-the-South-Pole-standing-upside-down-since-Earth-is-spheroidal-in-shape-and-we-stand-vertically</a><br />
<br />
To put it bluntly "There is no up. There are no sides. North, south, east, and west are only conventions. Maybe gravity has something to do with it."<br />
<br />
Literally people are accepting the common answer, and not questioning it. When the common answer is "Just because." I tend to have a problem with it, and want to test it.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.clipartkid.com/images/4/pool-eight-ball-backgroundsy-com-QUX5gT-clipart.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.clipartkid.com/images/4/pool-eight-ball-backgroundsy-com-QUX5gT-clipart.jpg" height="240" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
The eight ball above is a sphere. Also the same shape as the earth. It has a logical top, which anyone could point to. Most of us, if asked to point the top, by a pre-school teacher, would point at the logical top. We wouldn't point to a side, or the bottom.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://beaden.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Basketball.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://beaden.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Basketball.png" height="320" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
The image above is a basketball. It is also a sphere, but slightly bigger than our eight ball. If our pre-school teacher dug it out, and said point to the top, most to of us would point to the logical top. Exactly as we did with the eight ball.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/22/Earth_Western_Hemisphere_transparent_background.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/22/Earth_Western_Hemisphere_transparent_background.png" width="320" /></a></div>
The image above is the earth. It is nothing more than a scaled up billiard ball. Most of us, if asked to point to the top of the earth, would locate the north pole. But now, all of a sudden, our pre-school teacher wants to give us an 'f'. No one cares to question this?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.kingkongpartyrentals.com/images/interactives/velcro_wall/kingkongpartyrentals_velcro_wall_fun_photos_03.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.kingkongpartyrentals.com/images/interactives/velcro_wall/kingkongpartyrentals_velcro_wall_fun_photos_03.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
Our friend above is stuck to a wall. Imagine if that was a giant sphere. All the blood would rush to their head. You could build the sphere the size of New York. It wouldn't matter. The same logical occurrence would happen. The amount of energy you would need to walk from below the sphere's equator to the top is astronomical. So much so that it would be impossible. You would be walking sideways, as if up the side of a mountain. Only with suction cups could you do it.<br />
<br />
So what is the force that sticks you to the earth's crust? Gravity. Gravity pulls us to the crust. However, logically speaking, Gravity ONLY pulls you towards the center. That's all, that's it. A pulling force to the center. It does not have some magical property that negates the shape, or behaviour of a sphere.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9msyXA9yX1ZbL834Y8PHbvzsATPLFsrhXYxUfCzbQWOAfXmxRTLNlk6apiq1jHAHbZ5oejXKp7hBVft2aI5MyEcqOD_xwARsy5tYTEwrwxDqPkT_LonKVN3_BRJlnnQE4dQid-3t9vAIY/s1600/Africe+0g+core.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="266" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9msyXA9yX1ZbL834Y8PHbvzsATPLFsrhXYxUfCzbQWOAfXmxRTLNlk6apiq1jHAHbZ5oejXKp7hBVft2aI5MyEcqOD_xwARsy5tYTEwrwxDqPkT_LonKVN3_BRJlnnQE4dQid-3t9vAIY/s400/Africe+0g+core.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
The image above shows little red arrows pointing to areas on the crust where gravity would be pulling towards. The large red arrow shows our logical up, also the flowing direction of the Nile. <br />
<br />
Gravity would pull your feet to the equator, on Africa, as we would suspect. Now, what is the magical property of gravity that goes beyond this, and gives us reason to throw out all spherical logic, to go as far as to say we are not on the side of a sphere?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/primarylanguages_assets/french/images/our_world_solar_system.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/primarylanguages_assets/french/images/our_world_solar_system.jpg" height="215" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
All the alleged spheres in our solar system have no top or bottom? That's as if to say space has no up or down. I like to assume space has a logical view. I'm not certain, but I assume if there was an upside down astronaut in space for too long, they would die.<br />
<br />
You could use ISS footage of astronauts upside down to prove their is no up or down in space. I might then use an image of the tooth fairy to prove Santa.<br />
<br />
Consider this earth spin from Galileo.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/1375" target="_blank">https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/1375</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIHdAJ2lZSxIIqWpRvfxC43JGx0Z6h8cOI7g71X12X4ohyyjcOTnFbzhruDaXUB-vJG16AZenjFq3QWEBrYlNXph3Rb760po8RH8Ei-PGzLe97m8V4jRXuKWmJO6I3pJc9pw4uNusRHUxu/s1600/Galieo+Earth.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="298" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIHdAJ2lZSxIIqWpRvfxC43JGx0Z6h8cOI7g71X12X4ohyyjcOTnFbzhruDaXUB-vJG16AZenjFq3QWEBrYlNXph3Rb760po8RH8Ei-PGzLe97m8V4jRXuKWmJO6I3pJc9pw4uNusRHUxu/s400/Galieo+Earth.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
That's okay. We don't care if the clouds hardly move for 5 hours, or that Australia is the only continent on earth, or if Antarctica is no longer on the south pole. Most will accept the mind control.<br />
<br />
The following image is Australia from near the same angle in Google Earth. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhsmqKqVqkQJF83-C_JUER5si96O8VzJrcA597CoNEbllHbunWMNbvztlV4iFyeBBMAvoZ5Aw0haLDBMfa8NykEcGUWQVq9zalmmR89LAzI6fgJi5joTyRgvolB6XjTGszyrmoxz76KX2-f/s1600/Australia.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="214" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhsmqKqVqkQJF83-C_JUER5si96O8VzJrcA597CoNEbllHbunWMNbvztlV4iFyeBBMAvoZ5Aw0haLDBMfa8NykEcGUWQVq9zalmmR89LAzI6fgJi5joTyRgvolB6XjTGszyrmoxz76KX2-f/s320/Australia.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Here is Google Earth overlapping Galileo's image:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEia8yzhxwSsdNmIW1QrmSHXDVNXzWB-s7FTDSdwfaPVVmumAst9l4i6h2lJubZhuIAfp2ltJAYNgXqS-haQm-qaebFGetC4BX0AGAAp3vqE7sP-kK6lssiQy0ASWLP3mt1Wfy4Bwr_fC0f7/s1600/Gearth_Overlay_Galieo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="298" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEia8yzhxwSsdNmIW1QrmSHXDVNXzWB-s7FTDSdwfaPVVmumAst9l4i6h2lJubZhuIAfp2ltJAYNgXqS-haQm-qaebFGetC4BX0AGAAp3vqE7sP-kK6lssiQy0ASWLP3mt1Wfy4Bwr_fC0f7/s400/Gearth_Overlay_Galieo.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<a href="https://i.imgsafe.org/aa860be980.jpg" target="_blank">Zoomed View</a><br />
<br />
We see that all the islands north, and Asia had been dropped completely.<br />
<br />
Someone argued that distance mattered.<br />
<br />
Yet from alleged earth moon shot there is land. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/moon_and_earth_lroearthrise_frame_0.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="180" src="https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/moon_and_earth_lroearthrise_frame_0.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<a href="https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/moon_and_earth_lroearthrise_frame_0.jpg">https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/moon_and_earth_lroearthrise_frame_0.jpg</a><br />
<br />
Plenty of land visible from ISS. Of course I don't believe this photo is real either, considering the ship in the top right, which I'll call allegedly photoshopped in.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/photo/2015/09/images-from-offworld/o03_wAAsh1f/main_900.jpg?1443035563" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="211" src="https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/photo/2015/09/images-from-offworld/o03_wAAsh1f/main_900.jpg?1443035563" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
As a closing note. I'm not even a flat earther. Most likely the earth is round, and science is wrong about forces at play, or I'm just wrong about space having no up or down. This is just a fun way to question science, and what they enforce as science, and the forces at play. <br />
<br />
I am however, very weary of NASA, and fakery. Considering all the evidence I have seen.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4321952103928482443.post-22509932823826422832017-01-01T10:40:00.001-08:002017-01-02T08:09:31.325-08:00European Space Agency - Fraudulent Footage<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vHWDNrrfhnI/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vHWDNrrfhnI?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
While browsing for answers in this space dilemma, I was able to catch the European Space Agency in a lie. We'll cover the footage above for inconsistencies to prove space agencies are not afraid to present false footage, to convince people of lies. I'm just not sure what the lie is, or if we'll ever get to the bottom of it.<br />
<br />
1:41 the left hand footage is above clouds. On the right side there isn't a single cloud in sight.<br />
1:52 we are still very high above clouds, with no clouds on the right.<br />
1:58 the left side footage jerks oddly, and resumes to a strange, uneven, speed of climb.<br />
2:13 on the right we see the smoke creates a wave inconsistent of any activity on the left.<br />
2:16 Interestingly the fuel tanks have already started jettisoning on the right. Not on the left.<br />
2:18 pause. Fuel tanks on left facing rocket, but on the right they have fallen away, and are facing outward. Near this time, or only seconds before, you will see the sky change color on the right. This is when the sync problems really show.<br />
3:18 tons of blue water and a few white clouds.<br />
3:44 at alleged satellite launch we have a complete white out. Nothing but clouds. <br />
<br />Watch to where the rocket on the left is clearly in space. On the right it is not in space. You see it no higher than where an airplane might be. Sorry guys, but the footage does not line up, and that thing is not in space.<br />
<br />
One last thing:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiohj2BUQR_dAv4ByxyX9y1c3SQitgGr0Sof-yZ_Oml-abrRValX3SDDqqufWWaTbvuGLIw289D2-5wglgOofGtqPGw37pwhyphenhyphenCHg6UP7le2vGrbhp-ljADaThkBc32EgW__N4-QOVspxRYb/s1600/satellite.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="250" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiohj2BUQR_dAv4ByxyX9y1c3SQitgGr0Sof-yZ_Oml-abrRValX3SDDqqufWWaTbvuGLIw289D2-5wglgOofGtqPGw37pwhyphenhyphenCHg6UP7le2vGrbhp-ljADaThkBc32EgW__N4-QOVspxRYb/s400/satellite.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
That satellite is clearly visible, yet the other 100, 000 alleged satellites are nowhere in sight. Neither a single piece of space debris?<br />
<br />
What are they hiding? Is anything beyond low earth orbit possible?<br />
<br />
The best part? They are launching a satellite! Of all footage to fake and create inconsistencies in<br />
<br />
This too, is worth exploring.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14515821607659552110noreply@blogger.com3