The Queen: No Figurehead

Many people in Canada might have learned the lie in their lifetime that the queen is more of a figurehead than she is a ruler. I'm not sure what the purpose of such a lie is, but I'm here to teach you that the queen is the sovereign ruler of not only the United Kingdom, but also Canada, whom is a colony of Britain itself.

If you flip over the penny you will see the queens head. She is getting old, so likely, in most of our lifetimes, we will see a kings head stamped on new pennies. Some of my readers might be thinking, so what, the queens head is on the penny, that doesn't make her not a figurehead. We also find the truth in the law. When you go to court for breaking the law you will be hearing from the "crown prosecutor." who prosecutes on behalf of the crown. You'll also find that all our law books are written in the name of "her majesty."

So, where's the definitive proof that she is still our queen? We find it on the official website of the royal family. Where we learn that the queen is above the law, and may never be charged for any offense, whatsoever:

http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/Queenandthelaw/HowUKandEUlawaffectTheQueen.aspx

So what's the penalty in Canada for grand treason? Life, according to bill C-46, Protection of Persons in Authority.

(1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,

• (a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;
• (b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
• (c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
  
  
   (1) Every one who commits high treason is guilty of an indictable offence and shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life.

 If you try to harm the queen, ie throw a rock but miss, you will be imprisoned for fourteen years:

• (b) does an act that is intended or is likely to cause bodily harm to Her Majesty,is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

 I don't know who would teach that the queen, who is above the law, is a figurehead, but this lesson of Canada is NOT the truth.

Evolution (Kent Hovind and White Rabbit)

The videos above are a pretty good take on evolution. I don't believe everything in the videos, but do believe the bottom video gives a good explanation of why evolution is pushed so hard to be popularized by some of the global elite.

It's Just A Joint - How You Could Get Life Over A Toke In Canada

There were certain issues we talked about as friends, and issues I knew others talked about too. Remember wondering if a hit of 'e' could really get you life in prison? Remember saying weed was just a misdemeanor and no one cared, but you could go for life over just one ounce of coke?

We couldn't have been farther from the truth. The truth is much different. Canadian law states the second time you're caught with weed, and are sentenced within 10 years, you are liable for a life sentence. Quite a price to pay for a couple of joints. Lets not speculate like a bunch of teenagers. Lets dig into the letter of the law itself, after-all, that's how we're going to solve these problems, if we're to solve them at all.

We look to the Controlled Substance Act:

(2) No person shall seek or obtain

    (a) a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV, or

    (b) an authorization to obtain a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV

(3) Every person who contravenes subsection (1) or (2)

    (a) subject to paragraph (a.1), if the subject matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule I or II, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life, and

        (i) to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year if

            (A) the person committed the offence for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a criminal organization, as defined in subsection

467.1(1) of the Criminal Code,

            (B) the person used or threatened to use violence in committing the offence,

            (C) the person carried, used or threatened to use a weapon in committing the offence, or

            (D) the person was convicted of a designated substance offence, or had served a term of imprisonment for a designated substance offence, within the previous 10 years

Now Let us note where you get your life sentence over weed, if you haven't been paying attention.

(3) Every person who contravenes subsection (1) or (2)

    (a) subject to paragraph (a.1), if the subject matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule I or II, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life, and 
    
(D) the person was convicted of a designated substance offence, or had served a term of imprisonment for a designated substance offence, within the previous 10 years

 See that in the beginning? Contravenes means to break, or break the law in that section. Let me show you one simple quote from section 1 that constitutes breaking the law in that section:

(2) No person shall seek or obtain

• (a) a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV

Guess what one of the substances is in section II? Cannabis. 

Lets put all that law in simple terms:

The second time you are caught with 1-3 grams of pot within a ten year period, and are convicted, the second time you can be handed a life sentence.

It's that simple...

It's not just weed, it's your whole life. Once in prison, there's no getting out. To a Christian who still smokes, it means so much more. If they chip prisons, and the beast mark of revelations holds any truth, you've sold your soul for a few grams.  

 Don't believe me?

Read it yourself.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-38.8/ 

Aborted Fetal Cells: Skincare and Soda

Ever wonder what happens to fetal cells when babies are aborted? Well, once upon a time ago stem cell research was illegal. Who would of thought one day we might be drinking them, or putting them on your skin. How do you go from hard-core activists in the news against something to putting it in a soft drink?

The poster of the video below goes as far as to say:

"This is what you get for murdering your baby by abortion in the first place. How ironic is it that you end up eating, drinking, and wearing the babies you murdered America. Talk about a harsh punishment, but it gets worse on judgement day."

Now, there might be a stretch in the video, but there are links that say Pepsi has signed a contract with a company making a sweetener out of these cells. It might not be in Pepsi yet, but if you don't keep your guard up your next drink might contain someone's own baby... and if you've ever aborted, what would the irony if it were yours?

Feel free to check out the link below for another article. Do your research, talk to your local reps. Make sure this stuff doesn't happen, and if it does happen, that it stops.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/confused-about-the-pepsi-fetal-cell-issue-here-are-the-facts

Implantable Chip Dangerous

I've been thinking of some reasons of why we shouldn't accept the implantable chip when it comes out. Besides the normal biblical reasons, and the possibility of them being true, there must be a couple of others. There has to be something beyond the prospect of hell forever, fire, torment, and festering boils that might convince the average human being that it might not be a good idea, because you know, that might not be enough. That is if it's all true.

They say they can put a GPS in it so people can find their kids. Do you think that's really safe? Ransom was bad enough, but with the chip, there's no way anyone's going to get their kid back in one piece... Literally. Think some thug is going to think twice about lopping some kid's hand off to lose a tracker? That hand will hit the ground before they hit the back seat. Still sound like it will keep kids safe?

We have to remember that thieves are just as technologically advanced as the rest of society. They're called hackers, and they know how to abuse some of the most robust systems devised. Banks would like us to think no one can hack into their systems, or that chip readers couldn't be invented, but I bet the truth is far different. Right now a business man has the opportunity to walk into the bank at gun point, hoping the criminal wont shoot him when the money is withdrawn. With a chip inserted he has to worry about losing his hand, and if it's in his forehead, well, he can kiss his 5'oclock goodbye.

The chip isn't as safe as it's cracked up to be. It's pushed as a great innovation on the horizon that will protect, and ensure man's safety, but is that the truth? Other than hell and dismemberment to worry about, there's also the enslavement matter. Everyone chipped with little to no privacy. Say goodbye to people handing their kids a loonie, and so long left hand. It's all coming to a close now.

Keep your mind sharp, and you're hands attached.

Red Sticker Blog.