Weather Modification: The Real Kind

Sorry for the previous blunder, and I do apologize. I totally tricked myself. Hey, it happens. The tinfoil hat WILL play tricks on you. However, the show must go on. I've gathered some information about weather modification. Not the kind developed on the moon with secret black ops technology. The kind developed here on earth and admitted to by the government.

Be careful about some of the messages in the video above. I'll admit that it's a bit wonky, but you will see the government admitting fully to using HARP to mess with the ionosphere.

Not sure about HAARP controlling recent hurricanes, but the video above explains ELF waves ability to steer hurricanes.

Feel free to learn more by researching HAARP, weather engineering, and ionosphere manipulation by searching YouTube.

Mercury and Venus Visibility Impossible

The documentary above makes the claim that Mercury and Venus would never be visible in the Heliocentric modal. It may, or may not be, the voice of Eric Dubay. I've done a little research and found this claim invalid. I did come across something interesting, and that's what I'd like to share.

We'll use Pretoria Africa as our starting point. I love Africa, because it's near the center of the globe face, and if any place could break a modal, it's Africa. It's great for this kind of scientific assessment.

Sunset: 7:04PM
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/south-africa/pretoria

Venus Set Time: 9:46PM
https://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/night/south-africa/pretoria

We'll use the time 8:20PM-8:40PM. This is just after sunset, and about an hour before Venus sets.

The following image is a diagram of Africa, containing a red line for field of view, and a red line to the planet. It's all crude estimates, but we're pretty close for the time.

Enlarge

As we can see the claim has been totally debunked, but an interesting question arises. Are they seeing the full planet, or a half lit planet? Considering the angle, only a small portion of the planet should be lit. Pretoria South Africa should pretty well be looking near the dark side of Venus on January 9th, 2017.

Note: Venus and other planets have phases, so the claim may be totally debunked.

Live Chart Of Solar System:
http://www.theplanetstoday.com/

Celebrate Truth - Scientism Exposed (Documentary)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeIGrEtPMmE

The above documentary is one of the best I've seen this year. It explores the topic of geocentrism, and goes head to head with the fallacy of scientism. They explore topics from the heliocentric model to evolution.

I'm not sure about flat earth, but geocentric is awesome. I'm weary of certain people in this movement, for obvious reasons, but it's worth a listen. There is certainly some truth in here.

Science - Dumb As a Boot

Above is our favorite BBC footage. The one where Brian Cox tells us falling objects are not falling, but rather, they are standing still.

The video below is a rocket launch, that may just bring the entire theory into question. Notice when the bottom is jettisoned the smaller piece vanishes in seconds, while the bigger piece lingers for a long while.

In the video below Brian Cox tells us about electrons.

Electrons in our hand are responsible for not allowing an apple to go through our hand. Right, the video is older, but one minute gravity pulled objects down, the next minute objects are not pulling down, but rather they are standing still. Standing still, despite falling. They can't make up their minds.

What are they going to teach us about electrons now? Obviously electrons are no longer needed to keep non-falling density from going through our solid flesh.

Above is how gravity works. Well, used to work. Now when you jump you wont be falling back to earth. Not according to Brian Cox, anyway. NASA is there too, with him. Yes, now when NASA launches a ship, it's engines are no longer propelling it away from the earth, the earth orbiting away gives it the graceful look of flying. They'll wait for the moon to orbit around and land under their non-falling craft.

"Did you hear that chirp, 1/100 of a second ago?"
 "Yes, why I yes I did. That son, is the sound of two converging black holes over 2 million years ago, over 9 gazillion km away. It all happened on June 15th, about mid-day. Why, I do believe it was raining that day. I can tell by the pitch and frequency. I also believe ice is forming on Mars. Yes, most certainly ice, on the northern pole." 

Nile - Globe Defying Rivers

The Nile river is a massive north running river. It's huge. Wiki tells us that it runs from Tanzania all the way up to Egypt. The problem Eric Dubay (God save his soul) suggests is that this defies a globe. The northern part of Africa is on one side of the curvature, and the southern side is below the other side of the curvature.

This is the logical tilt needed, heeding no scientific explanation to get the Nile, and Africa upside down, to have it all running in that direction. The problem is, this is NOT the way the world is. The south pole, would melt, and trade places with Australia.

The image above accurately depicts the way the world is. There's no way around it. The Nile defies curvature.

It's gotta be the moon. They told us the moon controls tides, right? Nope, sorry. The logical explanation is not the moon. After all, rivers have to run day and night, from source to source. What is the logical explanation? Give up? Location on a globe, due to gravity, does not control where land is tilted. Well, this sounds nice to laymen. However, we just looked at a map and proved the Nile spans the curve.

Want to make things a little more confusing? America has MANY south running rivers, South America south running rivers, and Canada many north running rivers.

Does this disprove a globe? No, of course not, but it does make my head hurt. At best it disproves logic, and proves we don't live in a Godless world, where God himself is void of controlling some things all on his own.

Any logical answers would be greatly appreciated. Not to say God isn't logic, of course.

Thanks for reading.

LIGO - Lie-Go

This video goes over the absurd lie being perpetrated by the scientific community.  They claim .03 seconds worth of data, gathered by shooting two beams down a hall at mirrors, unaware of the outside world, relates to two black holes that converged over a million years ago, over 9,460,730,472,580,800,000,000 Kilometers away. It's ridiculous.

If I came up to you with a wave drawing, and said, I set up a pencil on the end of a spring loaded vibration detector, and this vibration proves 200 million years ago two dying stars converged, and created a ripple in space time, wouldn't you call me a liar? Don't be afraid to do the same if the science makes just as ludicrous of claims.

The video above goes over what he feels is the absurdity of space time. I certainly can't endorse a majority of his videos, because of their non-christian nature, but this one makes sense to me, and I find it entertaining.

Science - The Stupidity of Gravitational Waves

These geniuses are trying to prove a theory that can't be proved, and one that has no basis in existence.

We covered this in a lot of detail in our last post.

https://redstickerblog.blogspot.ca/2016/12/debating-gravity-and-falling-objects.html

Listen carefully to what he insinuates "The objects are not falling, they are standing still."

This is what science would have us believe, instead of what we observe? Falling objects are standing still.

If they are not falling why do they hit the ground? Consider how the earth's orbit would effect this. If the earth was on downward orbit, falling away from the sun, the objects should never touch the ground.

Thanks science. For the last oh, I don't know, 300 years, you were teaching us objects were falling because of gravity, and now, thanks to BBC, in 2016, you can teach us that because of gravity, objects are standing still! We still love you.

They must salivate with duper's delight.

I'm not sure about the full content of the video above, but the intro makes good points.

Enstien basically said space is a flat cloth, where objects sit, creating indentations in space time.

Place another ball on the cloth, and see what it does to Einstein's theory.

One could say gravitational forces pulling objects away from each other, each time they orbit, causes them to perpetually pull themselves back up the dip. This seems logical, but at the same time, must be impossible.

NASA

If the image above was a real image of space we notice there are billions of objects, all at different heights. Space could not be a cloth with objects sitting on it. It would have to be millions, and billions of cloths, all with objects at different heights, similar heights, and the same height as other objects. How could all these indentations from bodies in space not interfere with each other?

We mentioned the detection of gravitational waves before. Lets go over it one more time, with new information.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/feb/11/gravitational-waves-discovery-hailed-as-breakthrough-of-the-century

"the scientists listened for 20 thousandths of a second"
"the two objects had begun by circling each other 30 times a second"
"By the end of the 20 millisecond snatch of data, the two had accelerated to 250 times a second before the final collision..."

That's right, in less than .03 seconds, 9,460,730,472,580,800,000,000 Kilometers away they knew their wave was two black holes 35 times the mass of the sun. They knew how many times they circled each other, and exactly how fast. They didn't even need binoculars! We'll teach you how they figured it out.

What they want us to believe is sending laser beams down tubes at a mirror, which bounces them back, will detect gravitational waves some several trillion miles away. Not only does it detect waves 1.3 billion light years away, these genius oracles can tell us EXACTLY what causes the wave.

Who needs binoculars or a telescope when you got these MacGyvers with a ball point pen, a laser beam, some bubble gum, and a mirror.

For one thing, laser beams travelling down tubes don't know outer space exists. Come on.

It looks as fake as it sounds! Imagine believing beams travelling in tubes, unaware of the outside world, will detect waves from that distance, and somehow, these geniuses know the exact cause.

Check the Wiki Article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LIGO

Einstein invents the theory of relativity in the early 1900's. By the 60's scientists conveniently dream up LIGO. By 2015 they have it built. By 2016, just one year later, they have their gravitational wave! Something smells fishy to me.

Debating Gravity and Falling Objects

The BBC video above is to prove heavy and light objects fall at the same time in a vacuum. This is a similar condition to outer space, except of course with gravity. We would have to believe BBC, and expect the footage to be original, and not some kind of doctored propaganda campaign. 

You may have noticed the height of the drop in the video above is not very high.

I did catch an anomaly in the footage. Watch closely at 3:24. You will see the frame freeze, and hitch, when the host is pointing at the computer screen. If they are watching objects free fall, and did not touch the footage, why would this happen? The best explanation would be a glitch in their own software while viewing for the BBC camera.

The video above proves beyond a shadow of a doubt larger objects fall at greater speeds here on earth. Notice that the height at which the objects were dropped is much higher than in the first video. This will be crucial to our understanding of the BBC footage, considering the information to follow.

Next we see video where objects may land at same time from short distances.

The guy above pushes the typical scientific idea that lighter and heavier objects fall at the same time.

This video also drops items from a low height, while saying they have the same acceleration.

Who brought us this principal? Galileo.

We find this principal reinforced in the article below, and also an explanation as to why heavier objects seem to fall faster.

https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=164

"However, in the real world, we have things like air resistance, which is why sometimes heavy things do fall faster."

Eric Dubay holds fast to the idea the earth is flat and that there is no such force as gravity. He states buoyancy is the cause of  all objects falling and  rising. A denser object will fall faster, because it is heavier. Lighter objects fall slower, because they are lighter. Helium floats because it is lighter than air.

Funny enough, this is the exact explanation given by science.

levenement.ca

http://discoverykids.com/articles/why-do-helium-balloons-float/

A balloon will float to the surface of water, because it is lighter than water. Helium will float because it is lighter than air. - paraphrased information.

We see through common science, more often than not, that buoyancy is the answer.

Common to those who believe in gravity is that all objects have gravity. The truth from science is that all objects are not floating, they are falling through space. Orbital bodies are falling around each other. Our understanding of objects having mass means space itself is NOT, and never will be, zero gravity. According to science this gravity is caused by mass. Particles have mass. Space, not being a perfect vacuum, has particles.

This proves the BBC propaganda video to be a fraudulent hoax.

The man says "It's a miracle." Now I will prove why they are lying, and it is no miracle.

1) It's impossible to pump out all the air from their chamber.
2) They have not removed particle mass, which must exist in every particle in the chamber.
3) They only dropped the objects from a few meters, thus not being effective, and setting grounds for their bias.
4) We have proved that restrictions, such as air, particles, will slow falling objects.

Because of what we proved, we KNOW if they dropped the objects from a greater height, they would not have landed at the same time. It's impossible. These guys are liars.

I left this comment, which will likely disappear:

I'm not trying to disprove gravity, but shed light on lies, and false science. It's funny that what they're trying to prove, the conditions they're trying to invent to prove it, don't even exist. They don't even exist in outer space, where they are trying to prove it for! It's all ludicrous.

This isn't to say their science is, or isn't, off by miles. It does show that they are willing to lie, and lie blatantly. It also proves they are wrong, and theories they treat as Godly, such as Newtons laws, are mostly based on a modal that does not, and will not exist.

How wrong they are, we may never know.

For fun, lets explore some interesting words from Nichola Testla, which were publicized in a paper.

http://teslacollection.com/tesla_articles/1930///bonus_volume_new_york_sun_tesla_clipping_file_1930_1945

He found time while surveying his own past to express his sharp disagreement with the theories of Prof. Albert Einstein. He announced that the theory of relativity is "a mass of error and deceptive ideas and opposed to common sense," and that "not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved."

Flat Earth: Questioning Science

Video credit goes to marksargent:
Posted by Leisureex
(Watch with discernship)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkXE1MAyvawOySf9Jddaang

Remember, everything I post as flat earth is speculation and conspiracy. It's not necessarily a conspiracy that I endorse as a personal belief. I'm also not qualified to verify the facts.

In the above documentary Mark goes over some the conspiracies pertaining to the flat earth. It covers the idea of the dome, and the fact that he feels it exists.

The question continues. Did NASA and the government pull a fast one over us, and hide the secrets of our existence? Christians might ask: Does the firmament exist?

Genesis 1:1
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

Job 37:18
Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?

Scale models of the universe have proved imperfect.

The above image shows a scale sun from the earth's perspective to be much smaller than the actual sun (Based on To Scale's calculation.)

Where is the difference made up? Is it fixed by deciding the sun is bigger and farther away, or smaller and closer? It's hard to say without inside knowledge of absolute truth.

Image credit goes to IBtimes:
http://www.space.com/27338-total-lunar-eclipse-rare-sunrise-selenelion.html

The above image is from an article describing a Selenelion lunar eclipse. This happens when both the sun and moon are in the sky at the same time. Logically this is not supposed to happen because a  lunar eclipse happens when the moon passes directly behind the earth into the umbra shadow. The article writes this off as being due to light refraction causing the moon to look like it's up for a couple of extra minutes. One would think it would take much more than a couple of minutes to explain this.

Lets look at what science tells us about the sun, earth, and moon.

The earth spins at about 1000/mph.

The earth orbits the sun in one year, at a speed of  18/mps.

Here's where my science understanding gets weirded out on the current model.

The moon takes almost an entire month to orbit the earth. That's right a month. If that doesn't confuse you like it does me, carry on through the article.

The sun gets day and night in the heliocentric model through spinning. Pretend we are the sun and the above image is the earth. That ball is whirling around us and every continent facing us is expiriencing day time. When they face away it's night.

In our current model the moon is on the dark half for little more than a week and in the light half for little more than a week. Wouldn't you think there would be more than a week of moonless nights in the run of a month, instead of just one? When the moon is between the earth and sun, pitch black behind the earth should see no moon at all for an extended period of time.

That's what they tell us. 27 days for the moon to orbit the sun. 

Image credit goes to astronomy stack exchange:

http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/8042/moonless-night-and-lunar-phase

They say we get our lunar phases during this near month long orbit of the moon around the earth. See the new moon is completely black, while the moon is between the earth and sun. Really it should take the moon some 10-12 days to travel through the light half of the earth. 

Scientifically speaking, a moonless night, according to the heliocentric model, only happens once a month. If it takes the moon almost a month to orbit earth why is there not a week of moonless nights on both sides?

Are these things making the heliocentric model impossible? Is it true we can be THIS blinded by science and lies?

Image credit goes to Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_deGrasse_Tyson#NASA

Neil DeGrasse is an astrophysicist with a supposed genius understanding of the earth and space, and he has NEVER been to space to back his science. 

Image credit goes to Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus#Heliocentrism

Nicolaus Copernicus was a genius on the heliocentric model some 450 years before it could EVER be proved with space flight.

I don't want anyone to take my word for it. I'm science illiterate. Really my assumptions could be foolishness based on lack of understanding. Instead, I would love for someone to explain how this works in the current model, as I can find little understanding to conquer this dilemma.

Is science hiding something?

Genisis 1:16

God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also.

Red Sticker Blog: CERN In depth

Video credit goes to The Servants of YAHAWAH YASHARAHL

Clips from: CERN.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPt5Y38NBno

The science in the above film has not been completely verified, but it's an interesting look into the science of CERN. Many suspect CERN of doing scientific research they aren't fully informing the public about. Lets dive in, an see if we can dig up some more information.

Image credit goes to Daily Mail UK.

CERN talks lightly about probing into other dimensions. Possibly to discover if more than space and time exists:

http://press.web.cern.ch/backgrounders/extra-dimensions

CERN talks about developing black holes:

http://home.cern/about/physics/extra-dimensions-gravitons-and-tiny-black-holes

Some say CERN means something else by dimensions, but it's likely not so. Check the following article by DailyMail UK. They suggest CERN experiments with parallel universe science:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3280977/Are-scientists-discover-parallel-universe-Large-Hadron-Collider-powered-incredible-experiment.html

The follow article by CBC News talks about CERN's exploration for extra dimensions and dark matter:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/extra-dimensions-dark-matter-a-more-powerful-collider-hunts-for-clues/

Video credit goes to FBC FILMS:

(Watch  with discernship.)

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_q24HN3JQi3r3VQvF7gO1Q

Some people feel CERN will open up a can of worms of biblical proportions. Quite literally. Theories range from portals that will usher in the Anti-Christ, to blowing a hold in the ground, opening up the pit of Apollyon.

NASA: Journey To The Center Of The Sun

Take a look at the diagram of the sun in the following link.

http://history.nasa.gov/EP-177/ch3-2.html

Here's a quote.

"More recently, the combination of nuclear energy theory, laboratory experiments, and better solar observations has enabled scientists to obtain a good picture of the overall structure of the Sun. It is a ball of gas, composed of about 90 percent hydrogen, 9 percent helium, and only 1 percent of all the other elements such as carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, and iron. The diameter of the Sun is about 1,390,000 kilometers (865,000 miles), or about 109 times that of the Earth, and the Sun is 300,000 times as massive as the Earth."

The quote above is very interesting. Thanks for telling us all about the sun NASA.

Here's another cool article.

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/10jun_solarprobe

The following quote will teach you how they know what's at the center of the sun, what kind of fuel it burns, and what percentage of these fuels are used in over all consumption.

"We are going to visit a living, breathing star for the first time," says program scientist Lika Guhathakurta of NASA Headquarters."

Going to the sun for the first time, good to know.

These quotes are from the same article.

Mystery #1—the corona: If you stuck a thermometer in the surface of the sun, it would read about 6000o C. Intuition says the temperature should drop as you back away; instead, it rises. The sun's outer atmosphere, the corona, registers more than a million degrees Celsius, hundreds of times hotter than the star below. This high temperature remains a mystery more than 60 years after it was first measured.

Well that's an interesting mystery. When was the previous article written?

http://www.amazon.com/MEETING-WITH-THE-UNIVERSE-Discoveries-ebook/dp/B008CS58NG

Published in 2012. Okay, we're still good. Lets not worry about it. NASA can be trusted, right?

Mystery #2—the solar wind: The sun spews a hot, million mph wind of charged particles throughout the solar system. Planets, comets, asteroids—they all feel it."

Okay, what next?

"To solve these mysteries, Solar Probe+ will actually enter the corona," says Guhathakurta. "That's where the action is."

Alright. Probe Plus will enter the corona, where NASA just told us the temperatures reach a million degrees celsius, and there are million degree winds? That's pretty hot. Lets check out our periodic table for a second, and see what they're going to make this thing out of. They're going to need some pretty tough temperature resistant material. Not to mention the winds. Houses blow apart in 200/mph plus winds.

http://www.lenntech.com/periodic-chart-elements/melting-point.htm

Well, cars are made of iron or something, but that has a melting point of about 1500 degrees. Nickel wouldn't be much use melting at a lower temperature of around 1400 degrees. Man, too bad we didn't have some mythril. Titanium! That's the next best thing, right? Well, sort of. It hasn't got the highest known melting point, but even titanium is useless since it will melt at less than 1700 degrees. We're running out of options, people. Carbon is the highest on the period table, and that's burning up at 3500 degrees.

Ugh, lets just face it. They're not using a raw material. Obviously they're inventing something right? They better be. It's going to be hot up there!

Don't worry though! Solar Probe Plus has a thermal shield.

Okay, so what's the point of the article? JB's talking crazy again. I know, I know, I can write things pretty confusing. Here's the point. The article about Probe Plus it's dated 2008. So!? So! In the article of 2012 they were telling us what the sun burned for fuel down to the percentile, and how hot the corona was, and showed us what the core looks like. Maybe they do know, Lets give them the benefit of the doubt. Surely by 2012 they know all this by now, right?

Wrong!

The answer comes from the launch date of Solar Probe Plus.

https://www.google.ca/search?biw=1242&bih=606&q=launch+date+of+solar+probe+plus&oq=launch+date+of+solar+probe+plus&gs_l=serp.3..33i21.284731.289714.0.289868.33.26.1.0.0.0.300.3238.0j14j3j1.18.0....0...1c.1.64.serp..14.14.2383.zNiEibwwYPQ

July 31, 2018.

That's right THE FIRST probe is due to launch in 2 years. Looks at watch. Do you think NASA hires psychics too?

Edit:
This article is being edited because NASA said in the same article they were going to test from a distance away where temperatures were 1400 degrees celcius. This is much more logical, but only goes to show they can't help themselves but to lie in the same article, or simply just need to learn to write. One minute they write the corona is 1,000,000 degrees celsius, that they'll be entering the corona, and the next minute they say they're going where it's 1400 degrees celcius. NASA should really make up their mind.

Evolution (Kent Hovind and White Rabbit)

The videos above are a pretty good take on evolution. I don't believe everything in the videos, but do believe the bottom video gives a good explanation of why evolution is pushed so hard to be popularized by some of the global elite.

Aborted Fetal Cells: Skincare and Soda

Ever wonder what happens to fetal cells when babies are aborted? Well, once upon a time ago stem cell research was illegal. Who would of thought one day we might be drinking them, or putting them on your skin. How do you go from hard-core activists in the news against something to putting it in a soft drink?

The poster of the video below goes as far as to say:

"This is what you get for murdering your baby by abortion in the first place. How ironic is it that you end up eating, drinking, and wearing the babies you murdered America. Talk about a harsh punishment, but it gets worse on judgement day."

Now, there might be a stretch in the video, but there are links that say Pepsi has signed a contract with a company making a sweetener out of these cells. It might not be in Pepsi yet, but if you don't keep your guard up your next drink might contain someone's own baby... and if you've ever aborted, what would the irony if it were yours?

Feel free to check out the link below for another article. Do your research, talk to your local reps. Make sure this stuff doesn't happen, and if it does happen, that it stops.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/confused-about-the-pepsi-fetal-cell-issue-here-are-the-facts

CERN (Key to the pit, occult science, or nothing at all?)

Note - I don't endorse the videos above as entire truth, but have watched the videos for what truth they may contain. The following post is conspiratorial in the sense that not much can be confirmed, although the ground work for the science is there. Red Sticker Blog is meant to be a source for truth in the truth movement. We blog about confirmable facts, such as Luciferiansim in the government, it's connection to the United Nations, and other important information, however from time to time we may share conspiracy from the truth movement but warn readers of this so they can discern the truth for themselves.

Higgs boson - The Higgs boson or Higgs particle is an elementary particle in the Standard Model of Particle physics.

The Higgs boson has adopted itself the famous name "The God particle." Some think this particle is responsible for all the mass in the world, but we're going to find out, like almost always, man is wrong once again.

This particle is the smallest possible excitation in the Higgs field. This field exists everywhere in the universe. When particles pass through it they gain mass, as if passing through molasses. (Personally this sounds like to me, something invisible coming from one place and gaining mass when coming to another.)

When we're talking about physics and particles we have to understand that what scientists are getting close to is the very building blocks of the world around us, and to some, even the building blocks of what we would find in the spiritual. There are some that would claim the Higgs field may act as a veil between our world and the spiritual. Some Christians have gone as far as to say this is a purely demonic place.

Higgs boson was named after the scientist Peter Higgs. He wasn't partial to the particle being nicknamed "the God particle", along with other scientists, claiming it as inappropriate sensationalism. Higgs was a member of  Royal Society of Edinburgh, and also Royal Society. He turned down knighthood, but accepted membership The Order of the Companion of Honour. He's quite well decorated in the field of science and education.

Funny enough Royal Society's motto is "Take nobody's word for it", showing a blatant disregard for truth.

Lets follow some other interesting information. Higgs was into campaign against nuclear disarmament until they turned against nuclear power. He was also actively in Greenpeace, until they turned against genetically modified organisms. He's a self professed atheist, but we'll never know if this is totally true or not. It's hard to say if he himself has any occult ties, but this painting of him was unveiled at University of Edinburgh, where he was quite active, hints to such.

The painting seems to depict Higgs standing in front of a mirror, while his spiritual self looks through some dimensional light. Still, this depiction by an artist isn't enough to tie him to anything substantial in belief, or the occult world. This simply may be an artistic representation in the artist's mind.

Interestingly CERN has a statue of Shiva, often associated as Shiva the destroyer, which some say is a testament to their nature and pagan/magic background. In Christianity we call Satan the destroyer, because in a sense, in God's world, it is a sin to destroy something needlessly. He is the destroyer of God's creation. This is just a bit of extra spiritual meaning behind some of the things involved. It's not a claim to complete understanding to the methodology behind their own doings.

The conspiracy goes that in these biblical times most things, especially major complexes such as CERN, will play one role or another in the fulfillment of prophecy. It's believed that the occult elite might have a major hand in the sciences behind it. Some believe the elite are hiding their true intentions and plan to use this technology to open a pit or portal where spiritual things [without  mass] can pass through the portal [The Higgs field] into our own world and gain mass.

 Popular bible quote used for this is:

Rev 9: 1And the fifth angel sounded, and I saw a star fall from heaven unto the earth: and to him was given the key of the bottomless pit.

² And he opened the bottomless pit; and there arose a smoke out of the pit, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air were darkened by reason of the smoke of the pit.
³ And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth: and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power.

Some people think that maybe underground where the CERN experiments are happening something will go horribly wrong. The verse does mention an angel coming from the heavens. IF this has to do with CERN what I would picture in my mind is spiritually, but not physically, an angel coming down like a streak of light, hitting the ground during a CERN experiment, and opening up a pit where strange things come out. If this is so, likely not what the occult leaders thought, or were told, but hey, that's what happens when you make your God Lucifer.

Well... In all honesty, no matter what CERN is doing, or where the pit in the verse of revelation comes from, I think we're not there yet. IF this technology morphs into this happening, or becomes the kind of technology used by occultists to open some veil, it wont be until some time in the future. To be perfectly honest the pit doesn't happen until the fifth trumpet blast. We haven't even come through the seals yet. The trumpets don't biblicaly start until after God has loosed the seventh seal.

Before any pit is opened, CERN or no CERN, CERN technology, or no CERN technology, we'll see the anti-christ, the beast system, the mark of the beast, and near total collapse. That is if scripture is on point. This is the true order of biblical prophesy. It's not likely we'll see any pit opened tomorrow. There's too much pre-told to happen before hand. That is if things are inline with the word of revelations text.

As far as this conspiracy goes I just offered it as food for thought, and to share the concern of some that CERN may be a possible player, hiding occult nature behind lies and deceptions of "atheistic science." As for the truth, we'll likely never know.