Many people rebute the slaughter of innocence, telling others, there is no proof "all these children" were killed. It's come to light these guys may be living in a bit of a fantasy land. It's as if they're wondering where the proof of the million slaughtered children are. This is a foolish deception to stumble people, and I'd like to lift the fog a little. It's quite important to do, and quite nonsensical to be hung up on this, as I once was.
Matthew 2:16
16 Then Herod,
when he saw that he was deceived by the wise men, was exceedingly angry;
and he sent forth and put to death all the male children who were in
Bethlehem and in all its districts, from two years old and under,
according to the time which he had determined from the wise men.
Here, is where people get fetched up in their think, and looking for evidence.
The birth rate in the middle east is roughly 35-50 children per 1,000 people. The population of Bethlehem at the time of Jesus' birth was only about 1,000 people. This is the year 2016, over 2000 years later.
One would be looking for only 50 graves, out of the 1000+ that would exist based on normal infant mortality rate. The chance of proving, or disproving, such an event is highly unlikely, without searching every grave.
I suspect the need to do so either way is quite trivial.
I have no reason to believe the apostles lied when they gave an account of this event.
We shouldn't be worrying about, nor looking for the mass grave of a million babies. Clear your mind, and breath. The total death count, most likely, was around 20-50 children, or even less.
Wednesday, November 30, 2016
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Paedophilia Ties in Politics
Some politicians put the p in pedophile, and apparently spirit cooking isn't the only fruit hanging in the Podesta family tree. We blogged about John Podesta's connection to Hillary, and Maria Borovik's bloody spirit cooking. Now it's coming to light that John's brother, Tony Podesta, collects art from Biljana Djurdjevic. Her specialty? Paintings of children... In some rather strange situations.
One in Tony's home:
washingtonlife.com/2015/06/05/inside-homes-private-viewing/
See her strange work, and what these politicians have looked at:
Biljana Djurdjevic Art
Strangely Politicians are reported to visit a pizza shop known as Comet Ping Pong.
It gets worse:
KJ Osbourne
ScariestMovieEver
One in Tony's home:
washingtonlife.com/2015/06/05/inside-homes-private-viewing/
See her strange work, and what these politicians have looked at:
Biljana Djurdjevic Art
Strangely Politicians are reported to visit a pizza shop known as Comet Ping Pong.
It gets worse:
ScariestMovieEver
Wednesday, November 9, 2016
Trump Wins 2016 Elections
Trump won the 2016 presidential election by a handful of voters. Lets celebrate Red Sticker Blog style, by exposing some dirt on Trump Elect.
Trump Donated $100,000 Clinton Foundation
Now some videos and images to explore. Have fun, and feel free to share and comment.
Trump Donated $100,000 Clinton Foundation
Now some videos and images to explore. Have fun, and feel free to share and comment.
Tuesday, November 8, 2016
Hillary Tied to Satanism?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9UBBIbAtW0
TruthUnveiled777
The leaked Podesta emails show yet another sign of Satanism or witchcraft in the upper echelons of government. Check out Hillary's possible link to Satanists, and or witchcraft, being involved in the lives of her advisers.
Pron, Homosexuality, and Family
Warning:
I know people are extremely touchy about homosexuality, and their feelings towards it. I want people to know that I know of several homosexual people, and don't consider myself a bigot. I would not refuse business, or to offer aid to a person of their political standing, but do refuse to falter in some of my own personal beliefs on the topic. This is not an issue of discrimination, but rather one of personal political understanding, and knowledge.
The following video talks about some of the sexual depravities released about Hue Heffner, from a former "House Girlfriend." She talks about weekly sex rituals, and modes of operation around the house. KJ, on the channel TheScariestMovieEver also shares some enlightening information on homosexuality, and the role of family in the Christian world.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo8fiE2-s0SZu6Onb8lNLMQ
TheScariestMovieEver
K.J Ozborne
To any Christian reading, wondering why I wouldn't refuse business, or aid to a homosexual, my philosophy is deeply rooted in scriptures. I also don't want to be misinterpreted by same sex advocates, because I'm aware of scriptures calling for death, I just don't know if they still stand. Either way, I'll do my best to explain my position.
In scripture we're called to follow man's law, when possible. Of course, this can't be done when it conflicts with God's own ordinances, but it is in scripture to follow human institution when possible.
Peter 2:13
13 Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, 14 or to governors as sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right.
"Submit yourselves for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority."
Our law has stated that bigotry against same sex people is a crime, and I don't think we shouldn't have that in us to give.
Christians have refused to serve homosexuals in capacities I understand, but also some that I don't.
To those that have refused to marry, this is not the time to be in the wedding business. As we move towards the future we may see all kinds of strange marriages, including marrying objects, animals, and possibly worst. The best way to avoid the crime of bigotry is to not commit the sin of entering the business in this generation, or to have committed to the sin of entering in some generations passed. Do God's will. Let the sinful marry themselves.
To those who refuse to aid, or give food, this is not a command from God.
Remember what Jesus said to the pharisees, when they said, "Look, this man is healing on Sabbath, he is a sinner!" and tried to hold it against him?
Luke 14:5
And answered them, saying, Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fallen into a pit, and will not straightway pull him out on the sabbath day?
Besides calling himself Lord of Sabbath, in other verses, Jesus said in this one, it's okay to do good on Sabbath according to God's will, and that not one of them wouldn't have helped their own oxe, or sheep, out of a hole.
Another verse:
Matthew 6:26
Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
Jesus is saying don't worry about your life, God takes care of birds, and they don't even have barns for storage, won't he care for you, as you're much better than they are to him.
Get the drift here? If Jesus says it's okay to help an animal on sabbath, and that we're better than animals, how can we justify not helping each other? Would you be a hypocrite if you dug an animal out of a hole on sabbath, or helped an old lady cross the road, but didn't offer a homosexual a drink because of their sexual preference?
I'm not even advocating not having a crime against homosexuality, as would be a straight right in a democratic process. I'm just saying, we have to following God's will and law.
Just due, is due, where it's due. We have to remember that criminal process comes AFTER the trial. Not before.
I know people are extremely touchy about homosexuality, and their feelings towards it. I want people to know that I know of several homosexual people, and don't consider myself a bigot. I would not refuse business, or to offer aid to a person of their political standing, but do refuse to falter in some of my own personal beliefs on the topic. This is not an issue of discrimination, but rather one of personal political understanding, and knowledge.
The following video talks about some of the sexual depravities released about Hue Heffner, from a former "House Girlfriend." She talks about weekly sex rituals, and modes of operation around the house. KJ, on the channel TheScariestMovieEver also shares some enlightening information on homosexuality, and the role of family in the Christian world.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo8fiE2-s0SZu6Onb8lNLMQ
TheScariestMovieEver
K.J Ozborne
To any Christian reading, wondering why I wouldn't refuse business, or aid to a homosexual, my philosophy is deeply rooted in scriptures. I also don't want to be misinterpreted by same sex advocates, because I'm aware of scriptures calling for death, I just don't know if they still stand. Either way, I'll do my best to explain my position.
In scripture we're called to follow man's law, when possible. Of course, this can't be done when it conflicts with God's own ordinances, but it is in scripture to follow human institution when possible.
Peter 2:13
13 Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, 14 or to governors as sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right.
"Submit yourselves for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority."
Our law has stated that bigotry against same sex people is a crime, and I don't think we shouldn't have that in us to give.
Christians have refused to serve homosexuals in capacities I understand, but also some that I don't.
To those that have refused to marry, this is not the time to be in the wedding business. As we move towards the future we may see all kinds of strange marriages, including marrying objects, animals, and possibly worst. The best way to avoid the crime of bigotry is to not commit the sin of entering the business in this generation, or to have committed to the sin of entering in some generations passed. Do God's will. Let the sinful marry themselves.
To those who refuse to aid, or give food, this is not a command from God.
Remember what Jesus said to the pharisees, when they said, "Look, this man is healing on Sabbath, he is a sinner!" and tried to hold it against him?
Luke 14:5
And answered them, saying, Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fallen into a pit, and will not straightway pull him out on the sabbath day?
Besides calling himself Lord of Sabbath, in other verses, Jesus said in this one, it's okay to do good on Sabbath according to God's will, and that not one of them wouldn't have helped their own oxe, or sheep, out of a hole.
Another verse:
Matthew 6:26
Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
Jesus is saying don't worry about your life, God takes care of birds, and they don't even have barns for storage, won't he care for you, as you're much better than they are to him.
Get the drift here? If Jesus says it's okay to help an animal on sabbath, and that we're better than animals, how can we justify not helping each other? Would you be a hypocrite if you dug an animal out of a hole on sabbath, or helped an old lady cross the road, but didn't offer a homosexual a drink because of their sexual preference?
I'm not even advocating not having a crime against homosexuality, as would be a straight right in a democratic process. I'm just saying, we have to following God's will and law.
Just due, is due, where it's due. We have to remember that criminal process comes AFTER the trial. Not before.
Monday, November 7, 2016
Anonymous Guy Fawkes (Engineered Revolution)
Exposing Anonymous as an engineered movement, put on by the elite Satanists who created the comic books and movies. Check out other posts on where the creator is admitted Satanist, and used black magic to conjure inspiration. Anonymous, ripe with occult symbolism.
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Ghost of Dawkins Passed
Intro
I noticed a lot of people dig militant atheists like Richard Dawkins. Many of his cult followers tend to follow him, without even digging into who he truly is. This can be dangerous considering some researchers are beginning to claim he was never an atheist, but rather a psyop provocateur of the illuminati societies. Is he who he says he is, or is his hatred for God tied to something else altogether?
I'll admit his ties to conspiracy can seem vague, but they are not removed.
Lets take a look into my research. Please remember, the following post is opinionated, and not presented as absolute fact.
Dawkins Research
Father Clinton John Dawkins
Mother Jean Mary Vyvyan.
Google Images Clinton John Dawkins
The only images other than Richard Dawkins are three at the first, and one is a bank chairman. I don't know if they are positive matches for his father Clinton John Dawkins.
Google Websites Clinton John Dawkins
Some results are regarding a small obituary written by Richard on his father, and a couple of websites with ancestry records. If fact, it seems like the only one in the world that has written about his father is Richard himself. Seems strange for a man that lived a "noteable" life, as Richard calls it.
The following excerpt is from his father's obituary, which he has written, and hosted on his own foundation's website.
Richard's Obituary Excerpt
John's postwar work as an agricultural officer back in Nyasaland was interrupted when he received an unexpected legacy from a distant cousin. Over Norton Park had been owned by the Dawkins family since the 1720s. Cousin Hereward Dawkins, casting around the family tree for a male heir, could find none closer than my father, whom he had never met and who had never heard of him.
The Property:
Over Norton Park
Thank you distant cousin for pulling us from our small garden life, and giving us your mansion!
Estate Satalite Overview
That's right Over Norton Park. The Dawkins family estate. Not one built by shilling and writing books, but the one handed over by that loving distant cousin, who just couldn't think of anyone else.
Can we trust the original story of the mystery cousin, as Richard tells it? Lets try to do a little fact checking, and see what the family line has been up to ourselves.
Wiki Property History
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Over_Norton_Park
The above link tells a bit of the property's history, but nothing on Clinton John Dawkins (Richard's father.)
Apparently Clinton John Dawkins was the owner of one company: OVER NORTON PARK LIMITED.
Over Norton Park Limited
Strange. Tons of estate pictures... pictures inside homes, empty, but NONE of people... None.
Shroud in mystery. I wish I could find more evidence of Richard Dawkins being who he says he is, or that his family is who he defines them as.
Hmm, looks like there's a couple of skeletons in the closet after all.
Dawkins Ties To Slave Fortunes:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/9091007/Slaves-at-the-root-of-the-fortune-that-created-Richard-Dawkins- family-estate.html
Lets try his mother Jean Mary Vyvyan.
https://www.google.ca/search? q=Jean+Mary+Vyvyan&sa=X&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAONgFuLQz9U3MEs3iVfiBrEMDXPKKrKStSSzk630C1LzC3JSgVRRcX6eVUFiUWpeSfEjxgBug Zc_7glLuU9ac_IaoyMXbrVCKlxsrnklmSWVQlJcPFJwuzQYpLi44DweAGmP196HAAAA&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&ved=0ahUKEwjPyKP0tJP QAhXHZCYKHbCECDIQsAQIJQ&biw=1280&bih=644#imgrc=opaVRwJmDvM6RM%3A
Well, at least there's a bit more evidence for her existance than for his father's. One lonely picture of Richard reading a book with his mom, in a room that looks like it would be the pantry of their estate, nicely decorated with next to nothing pulled from some thrift shop down the road, in the big home they acquired from a cousin that never heard of them before. Where the heck are the jacobite slave drivers, with mad wealth, when you need them? Your 95th cousin awaits his family fortune, and free mansion.
Google web search:
https://www.google.ca/search? q=Jean+Mary+Vyvyan&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAONgFuLQz9U3MEs3iVfiBrEMDXPKKrKStSSzk630C1LzC3JSgVRRcX6eVUFiUWpeSfEjxgBugZc_7g lLuU9ac_IaoyMXbrVCKlxsrnklmSWVQlJcPFJwuzQYpLi44DweAGmP196HAAAA&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiSu4XTtpPQAhUI6SYKHcucD5sQri4IHQ
NOTHING. Same as Dawkin's father. Lame hits on a few wonky heritage sites, that MUST prove they exist, and are who we're told they are. The lineage doesn't lie though. Maybe they are who they are, and that's why we don't see them.
All we really see is Dawkins is part of a family with mass wealth, but no, Richard is not connected to this wealth directly, because this mansion fell from the sky. The property was a gift, a fluke of a lifetime, as Dawkins puts it... A distant cousin's gift to his father, even though he had never seen, or heard tell of him before in his life.
Entertaining Masonic Searches
Is Dawkins lying about who he is, because the truth is not yet meant to be revealed?
Illumination photo
https://www.google.ca/search? biw=1280&bih=673&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=richard+dawkins+hand+symbol&oq=richard+dawkins+hand+symbol&gs_l=img.3...69398.7095 8.0.71112.12.12.0.0.0.0.145.891.10j1.11.0....0...1c.1.64.img..1.3.256...0j0i67k1j0i30k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.P4q2wudm4Cc #imgrc=rb8gNvmCpfDQ-M%3A
Working heavily with other masons.
https://www.google.ca/search?%20biw=1280&bih=673&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=richard+dawkins+mason&oq=richard+dawkins+mason&gs_l=img.3...28979.29448.0.29723.5.%205.0.0.0.0.100.387.4j1.5.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.2.187...0j0i30k1j0i24k1.yDAk-z7GNUM#imgdii=xFgQhj6enWV2JM%3A%3BxFgQhj6enWV2JM%3A%3BWgXD3xfSuKc3rM%3A&imgrc=xFgQhj6enWV2JM%3A
https://www.google.ca/search?%20biw=1280&bih=673&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=neil+degrassse+illuminati&oq=neil+degrassse+illuminati&gs_l=img.3...22580.25598.0.%2025784.14.12.2.0.0.0.99.947.12.12.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.0.0.0z0ezLlLRdc#imgrc=QJrGKGUdNmDUzM%3A
https://www.google.ca/search?bih=644&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=dawkins++neil+degrasse&oq=dawkins++neil+degrasse&gs_l=img.3...46662.51674.0.51791.22.20.0.1.1.0.414.1643.14j2j4-1.17.0....0...1c.1.64.img..4.10.1057...0j0i67k1j0i30k1j0i5i30k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.28cvsNHWSAQ#imgrc=S51UUTxDJg4EgM%3A
https://www.google.ca/search? biw=1280&bih=673&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=neil+degrassse+pyramid&oq=neil+degrassse+pyramid&gs_l=img.3...325148.326314.0.3264 47.7.7.0.0.0.0.84.495.7.7.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.0.0.9z8QoBYZZ-M#imgrc=S2kQR3pCHx0_cM%3A
Pyramid
https://www.google.ca/search?q=richard+dawkins+priest&bih=644&biw=1280&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiYhb7J8pPQAhUC5CYKHVvEBQsQ_AUICigD&dpr=1#imgrc=MzbPXbWkSccBCM%3A
Religious Agendas
https://www.google.ca/search?site=imghp&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=richard+dawkins+religion&oq=richard+dawkins+religion&gs_l=img.3..0j0i30k1j0i24k1.3644.6905.0.7157.24.15.0.9.9.0.218.1244.14j0j1.15.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.24.1290...0i8i30k1.zxHCgKXXxUY#imgrc=ejn2AOaAPrtVAM%3A
https://www.google.ca/search?site=imghp&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=richard+dawkins+pope&oq=richard+dawkins+pope&gs_l=img.3..0i24k1l2.56343.59582.0.59711.5.4.0.1.1.0.95.323.4.4.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.5.323...0j0i67k1j0i8i30k1.kl5iUzgVaBM#imgrc=UP3KedQHdTA6sM%3A
https://www.google.ca/search?q=richard+dawkins+priest&bih=644&biw=1280&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiYhb7J8pPQAhUC5CYKHVvEBQsQ_AUICigD&dpr=1#imgrc=1uhjuxp00_B91M%3A
https://www.google.ca/search?q=richard+dawkins+priest&bih=644&biw=1280&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiYhb7J8pPQAhUC5CYKHVvEBQsQ_AUICigD&dpr=1#imgrc=tCMJgMy_b6EfvM%3A
Looks like Richard Dawkins is the poster boy for illuminati agenda of aboloishing theistic religions. Also looks a little like Satan, no?
https://www.google.ca/search?q=richard+dawkins+priest&bih=644&biw=1280&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiYhb7J8pPQAhUC5CYKHVvEBQsQ_AUICigD&dpr=1#imgrc=n1sdYUqiixtCgM%3A
So which is it? Is he not religious, or very religious about something?
He certainly has a mouth like Satan.
In the following video Richard Dawkins admits to intelligent design, but not of God. This is a red flag that he DOES believe in something, and has. There are more hints in his career.
The illuminati plan is to prime people for their religion. Could Dawkins believe in HP Blavatskys logos Satan? Does he believe in the other illuminate principal, that you can believe what you want, because all reality is created in the mind? Only time will tell if he will reveal more in future videos.
Digging into Twitter Followers:
https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/following
John Kerry
Al Gore
WikiLeaks (Shill leak site.)
Michelle Obama
Bill Maher
David Silverman
Joe Biden
Barack Obama
New Statesman (Connected to rothschilds, Fabien society, Russel Brand ah huh!)
Neil DeGrasse Tyson
CERN
Shilly enough, but nothing connected outright to Satanism, theosophy, such as church of Satan, or Theosophical Society.
--------------------------------------
Lets go back to the family estate. The first Dawkins to buy it was James Dawkins. This is Richard Dawkins Great- Great-Great grandfather.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Dawkins_(antiquarian)
A rich man, tied to sugar plantations. He sought help from Frederick the Great, with a Jacobite conspiracy.
Jacobites supported King James VII of Scotland, and II of England. They opposed Williamites, or Whigs, who supported Protestant cause. (Supported Catholicism.)
The British government issued a warrant for his arrest, but it was not put into affect on his return. He became MP of Hindon borough. (Odd change of history in wiki.)
The next in line in the family estate to be notable is Henry Dawkins II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Dawkins
He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1778. Another MP, and builder of the Dawkins fortune.
Henry Dawkins III, MP for Boroughbridge. The next MP in family line.
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/lbs/person/view/18122
By 1945 the estate was passed to a man name Heward. The story ends there. Supposedly it must have passed to another Heward, whom was the Heward that gave the property to Clinton Dawkings (Richards Father.)
----------------------------------------
As it seems Richard Dawkins is a man of mystery. A supposed Atheist with a militant hatred for God, who hasn't been totally forth right with the public. Why little to no photos of his family? What's with all the conspiracy connects, and how come there are no photos of family activity inside their mansion estate?
The questions are:
Is Richard Dawkins really an athiest?
Is he a freemason, or illumainst?
Are his parents really who he said they are?
Why has he near completely removed himself from his family history?
Is he a luciferian, or some other religious person, working with illuminati?
It's hard to tell, but everything is certainly fishy.
I noticed a lot of people dig militant atheists like Richard Dawkins. Many of his cult followers tend to follow him, without even digging into who he truly is. This can be dangerous considering some researchers are beginning to claim he was never an atheist, but rather a psyop provocateur of the illuminati societies. Is he who he says he is, or is his hatred for God tied to something else altogether?
I'll admit his ties to conspiracy can seem vague, but they are not removed.
Lets take a look into my research. Please remember, the following post is opinionated, and not presented as absolute fact.
Dawkins Research
Father Clinton John Dawkins
Mother Jean Mary Vyvyan.
Google Images Clinton John Dawkins
The only images other than Richard Dawkins are three at the first, and one is a bank chairman. I don't know if they are positive matches for his father Clinton John Dawkins.
Google Websites Clinton John Dawkins
Some results are regarding a small obituary written by Richard on his father, and a couple of websites with ancestry records. If fact, it seems like the only one in the world that has written about his father is Richard himself. Seems strange for a man that lived a "noteable" life, as Richard calls it.
The following excerpt is from his father's obituary, which he has written, and hosted on his own foundation's website.
Richard's Obituary Excerpt
John's postwar work as an agricultural officer back in Nyasaland was interrupted when he received an unexpected legacy from a distant cousin. Over Norton Park had been owned by the Dawkins family since the 1720s. Cousin Hereward Dawkins, casting around the family tree for a male heir, could find none closer than my father, whom he had never met and who had never heard of him.
The Property:
Over Norton Park
Thank you distant cousin for pulling us from our small garden life, and giving us your mansion!
Estate Satalite Overview
Can we trust the original story of the mystery cousin, as Richard tells it? Lets try to do a little fact checking, and see what the family line has been up to ourselves.
Wiki Property History
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Over_Norton_Park
The above link tells a bit of the property's history, but nothing on Clinton John Dawkins (Richard's father.)
Apparently Clinton John Dawkins was the owner of one company: OVER NORTON PARK LIMITED.
Over Norton Park Limited
Strange. Tons of estate pictures... pictures inside homes, empty, but NONE of people... None.
Shroud in mystery. I wish I could find more evidence of Richard Dawkins being who he says he is, or that his family is who he defines them as.
Hmm, looks like there's a couple of skeletons in the closet after all.
Dawkins Ties To Slave Fortunes:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/9091007/Slaves-at-the-root-of-the-fortune-that-created-Richard-Dawkins- family-estate.html
Lets try his mother Jean Mary Vyvyan.
https://www.google.ca/search? q=Jean+Mary+Vyvyan&sa=X&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAONgFuLQz9U3MEs3iVfiBrEMDXPKKrKStSSzk630C1LzC3JSgVRRcX6eVUFiUWpeSfEjxgBug Zc_7glLuU9ac_IaoyMXbrVCKlxsrnklmSWVQlJcPFJwuzQYpLi44DweAGmP196HAAAA&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&ved=0ahUKEwjPyKP0tJP QAhXHZCYKHbCECDIQsAQIJQ&biw=1280&bih=644#imgrc=opaVRwJmDvM6RM%3A
Well, at least there's a bit more evidence for her existance than for his father's. One lonely picture of Richard reading a book with his mom, in a room that looks like it would be the pantry of their estate, nicely decorated with next to nothing pulled from some thrift shop down the road, in the big home they acquired from a cousin that never heard of them before. Where the heck are the jacobite slave drivers, with mad wealth, when you need them? Your 95th cousin awaits his family fortune, and free mansion.
Google web search:
https://www.google.ca/search? q=Jean+Mary+Vyvyan&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAONgFuLQz9U3MEs3iVfiBrEMDXPKKrKStSSzk630C1LzC3JSgVRRcX6eVUFiUWpeSfEjxgBugZc_7g lLuU9ac_IaoyMXbrVCKlxsrnklmSWVQlJcPFJwuzQYpLi44DweAGmP196HAAAA&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiSu4XTtpPQAhUI6SYKHcucD5sQri4IHQ
NOTHING. Same as Dawkin's father. Lame hits on a few wonky heritage sites, that MUST prove they exist, and are who we're told they are. The lineage doesn't lie though. Maybe they are who they are, and that's why we don't see them.
All we really see is Dawkins is part of a family with mass wealth, but no, Richard is not connected to this wealth directly, because this mansion fell from the sky. The property was a gift, a fluke of a lifetime, as Dawkins puts it... A distant cousin's gift to his father, even though he had never seen, or heard tell of him before in his life.
Entertaining Masonic Searches
Is Dawkins lying about who he is, because the truth is not yet meant to be revealed?
Illumination photo
Working heavily with other masons.
https://www.google.ca/search?%20biw=1280&bih=673&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=richard+dawkins+mason&oq=richard+dawkins+mason&gs_l=img.3...28979.29448.0.29723.5.%205.0.0.0.0.100.387.4j1.5.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.2.187...0j0i30k1j0i24k1.yDAk-z7GNUM#imgdii=xFgQhj6enWV2JM%3A%3BxFgQhj6enWV2JM%3A%3BWgXD3xfSuKc3rM%3A&imgrc=xFgQhj6enWV2JM%3A
https://www.google.ca/search?%20biw=1280&bih=673&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=neil+degrassse+illuminati&oq=neil+degrassse+illuminati&gs_l=img.3...22580.25598.0.%2025784.14.12.2.0.0.0.99.947.12.12.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.0.0.0z0ezLlLRdc#imgrc=QJrGKGUdNmDUzM%3A
https://www.google.ca/search?bih=644&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=dawkins++neil+degrasse&oq=dawkins++neil+degrasse&gs_l=img.3...46662.51674.0.51791.22.20.0.1.1.0.414.1643.14j2j4-1.17.0....0...1c.1.64.img..4.10.1057...0j0i67k1j0i30k1j0i5i30k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1.28cvsNHWSAQ#imgrc=S51UUTxDJg4EgM%3A
https://www.google.ca/search? biw=1280&bih=673&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=neil+degrassse+pyramid&oq=neil+degrassse+pyramid&gs_l=img.3...325148.326314.0.3264 47.7.7.0.0.0.0.84.495.7.7.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.0.0.9z8QoBYZZ-M#imgrc=S2kQR3pCHx0_cM%3A
Pyramid
Religious Agendas
https://www.google.ca/search?site=imghp&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=richard+dawkins+religion&oq=richard+dawkins+religion&gs_l=img.3..0j0i30k1j0i24k1.3644.6905.0.7157.24.15.0.9.9.0.218.1244.14j0j1.15.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.24.1290...0i8i30k1.zxHCgKXXxUY#imgrc=ejn2AOaAPrtVAM%3A
https://www.google.ca/search?site=imghp&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=richard+dawkins+pope&oq=richard+dawkins+pope&gs_l=img.3..0i24k1l2.56343.59582.0.59711.5.4.0.1.1.0.95.323.4.4.0....0...1c.1.64.img..0.5.323...0j0i67k1j0i8i30k1.kl5iUzgVaBM#imgrc=UP3KedQHdTA6sM%3A
https://www.google.ca/search?q=richard+dawkins+priest&bih=644&biw=1280&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiYhb7J8pPQAhUC5CYKHVvEBQsQ_AUICigD&dpr=1#imgrc=1uhjuxp00_B91M%3A
Looks like Richard Dawkins is the poster boy for illuminati agenda of aboloishing theistic religions. Also looks a little like Satan, no?
https://www.google.ca/search?q=richard+dawkins+priest&bih=644&biw=1280&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiYhb7J8pPQAhUC5CYKHVvEBQsQ_AUICigD&dpr=1#imgrc=n1sdYUqiixtCgM%3A
So which is it? Is he not religious, or very religious about something?
He certainly has a mouth like Satan.
In the following video Richard Dawkins admits to intelligent design, but not of God. This is a red flag that he DOES believe in something, and has. There are more hints in his career.
The illuminati plan is to prime people for their religion. Could Dawkins believe in HP Blavatskys logos Satan? Does he believe in the other illuminate principal, that you can believe what you want, because all reality is created in the mind? Only time will tell if he will reveal more in future videos.
Digging into Twitter Followers:
https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/following
John Kerry
Al Gore
WikiLeaks (Shill leak site.)
Michelle Obama
Bill Maher
David Silverman
Joe Biden
Barack Obama
New Statesman (Connected to rothschilds, Fabien society, Russel Brand ah huh!)
Neil DeGrasse Tyson
CERN
Shilly enough, but nothing connected outright to Satanism, theosophy, such as church of Satan, or Theosophical Society.
--------------------------------------
Lets go back to the family estate. The first Dawkins to buy it was James Dawkins. This is Richard Dawkins Great- Great-Great grandfather.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Dawkins_(antiquarian)
A rich man, tied to sugar plantations. He sought help from Frederick the Great, with a Jacobite conspiracy.
Jacobites supported King James VII of Scotland, and II of England. They opposed Williamites, or Whigs, who supported Protestant cause. (Supported Catholicism.)
The British government issued a warrant for his arrest, but it was not put into affect on his return. He became MP of Hindon borough. (Odd change of history in wiki.)
The next in line in the family estate to be notable is Henry Dawkins II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Dawkins
He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1778. Another MP, and builder of the Dawkins fortune.
Henry Dawkins III, MP for Boroughbridge. The next MP in family line.
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/lbs/person/view/18122
By 1945 the estate was passed to a man name Heward. The story ends there. Supposedly it must have passed to another Heward, whom was the Heward that gave the property to Clinton Dawkings (Richards Father.)
----------------------------------------
As it seems Richard Dawkins is a man of mystery. A supposed Atheist with a militant hatred for God, who hasn't been totally forth right with the public. Why little to no photos of his family? What's with all the conspiracy connects, and how come there are no photos of family activity inside their mansion estate?
The questions are:
Is Richard Dawkins really an athiest?
Is he a freemason, or illumainst?
Are his parents really who he said they are?
Why has he near completely removed himself from his family history?
Is he a luciferian, or some other religious person, working with illuminati?
It's hard to tell, but everything is certainly fishy.
Public Apology: Jesus Shill
Public Apology
So I owe my small readership an apology for my last post. I wrote about a Jesus shill. Turns out that you CAN indeed have 2 YouTube accounts with the same name. For my mistake I apologize, and own up, but that's how you know I'm real. I don't owe any false God anything, and I'm not a member of anything, but good old life, and the church of God.
We make mistakes in the conspiracy world. All we can do is own up, and keep pumping out information for the masses.
Original Post:
http://redstickerblog.blogspot.ca/2016/08/chatted-with-jesus-shill.html
So I owe my small readership an apology for my last post. I wrote about a Jesus shill. Turns out that you CAN indeed have 2 YouTube accounts with the same name. For my mistake I apologize, and own up, but that's how you know I'm real. I don't owe any false God anything, and I'm not a member of anything, but good old life, and the church of God.
We make mistakes in the conspiracy world. All we can do is own up, and keep pumping out information for the masses.
Original Post:
http://redstickerblog.blogspot.ca/2016/08/chatted-with-jesus-shill.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)