Holocaust denial has become a crime in many countries of the world. Some people are questioning why. I need to wash my hands clean of the above video. Pastor Anderson goes over the reasons why he questions the holocaust, and he brings up good points. I'm not going to say I stand behind his commentary completely, but it does raise some questions. After hearing him I'm wondering if less people died in the grisly deaths of the holocaust, or if it was smaller than the official story lets on.
As Pastor Anderson states himself, I don't want people to think Red Sticker Blog is in any way racist, or supporting Hitler, and we're certainly not standing behind the words of Mr. Anderson completely. We're only questioning the reality around us, rather than denying anything.
The image above is a supposed scale rendition of the earth and moon. It's exactly why I'm questioning science. What we're given seems ridiculous compared to every day observation. The image shows the moon and earth. The entire system is like hiding a grain of rice behind a barn. It's hard to compare this to what we observe with our own eyes.
As for the last flat earth post I've been looking deeper into moon phases. I wasn't sure if my theory of improper phases was right. Through conversation it seems crescent moons are not visible all hours of the night, and they certainly shouldn't be. This much I was wrong about, and science supposedly had correct. I've examined one cycle from sunset to sunrise. The following phases are for Toronto, Canada.
Sun Set March 1st - 6:07PM
Moon Rise March 2nd- 1:46AM
Sun Rise March 2 - 6:52AM
Moon Set March 2nd - 11:44AM
Sun Set March 2 - 6:08PM
The above crescent moon is visible March 2nd. The sun sets on March 1st at about 6:07 PM. The crescent rises March 2nd at about 1:46 AM. This seems quite early. It's about 8 hours from sunset and about 5 hours from sun rise. This means the moon rises a little better than halfway through the night. Awfully early considering this moon must be catching sunlight and we have to be able to see it. Considering it's in space the sunlight part isn't troubling. It's the idea we should be able to see it from Toronto at that time.
It's cutting close to say the least. I think the key to proving or disproving the current model would be through experimentation. Looking at more crescent moons for discrepancies, and possibly creating 3D models, would reveal a lot.
Moon phases, rises, moon sets, including sun rises and sets, can be found at the following site: http://www.timeanddate.com
The following video shares some information on alleged propaganda coming from the science machine. Truth Media shares some information on a new gravitational wave detected from a billion light years away. Isn't it always a nice round number with these guys?
1 light year is roughly 6 trillion miles.
That's like six billion trillion something miles away. I don't even know how to calculate that number. That's like sending Mars water data back with their 90 million mile internet access. Quite hard to fathom. I'm not here to mislead though. I'm still leaning and questioning science, and unsure of what they can and can't do. Feel free to research and make your own conclusions on life.
This I do know. Don't trust a space agency that tells you there are aliens while working under a government that has flown more saucers than E.T.
In the last blog post I detailed a dilemma with moon phases. After probing the science a bit I've come to more of an understanding of how they work. Take a look at the image below to get an understanding of how positions in lunar orbit affect moon phases.
As you can see the moon is full when opposite of the sun, and getting full sunlight as light bends around the earth's atmosphere. The new moon can't be seen in the heliocentric model because it's directly in front of the sun, getting full light on the back portion. This all works perfect.
It's confusing to try and understand the waxing crescent and waning crescent. These are the only two phases that should not work in the heliocentric model. When the earth spins around into darkness we have to wonder how continents on the other side of the planet see crescent moons.
The image above shows two moon locations: waning crescent and waxing crescent. I could understand seeing these phases where the red x's are located, but not elsewhere. The continents on the right should see the crescent during the day. I just can't get my head around how the back part of the world, where the red line is, could see these crescent moons at night. This should be pretty impossible during earth's rotation.
The red arrow marks the new moon's trip into being a waxing crescent. Since lunar orbit takes about 27 days total, that one portion is about a 3 day journey for the moon. Logically speaking crescent moons should NOT be visible on the other side of the earth. I'm not sure how any crescent moon could be visible most nights. The thought of a crescent moon crossing an entire night's sky should be impossible.
At the time of writing this India and Mexico are both experiencing waxing crescent moons. It seems they are only looking at it at different angels.
Mexico's waxing crescent is something like below.
India's waxing crescent is something like the following image.
When Mexico is dead opposite, facing where the waning gibbous is in the image, I'm not sure how it could see this sun facing crescent at all. One moonless night is easy to explain and understand. Not having several is another.
Oddly, moon phases match up pretty well across the globe. There is little difference between phases, even on polar opposite ends of the world, such as Mexico and India.
Remember, everything I post as flat earth is speculation and conspiracy. It's not necessarily a conspiracy that I endorse as a personal belief. I'm also not qualified to verify the facts.
In the above documentary Mark goes over some the conspiracies pertaining to the flat earth. It covers the idea of the dome, and the fact that he feels it exists.
The question continues. Did NASA and the government pull a fast one over us, and hide the secrets of our existence? Christians might ask: Does the firmament exist?
Genesis 1:1 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. Job 37:18 Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?
Scale models of the universe have proved imperfect.
The above image shows a scale sun from the earth's perspective to be much smaller than the actual sun (Based on To Scale's calculation.) Where is the difference made up? Is it fixed by deciding the sun is bigger and farther away, or smaller and closer? It's hard to say without inside knowledge of absolute truth.
The above image is from an article describing a Selenelion lunar eclipse. This happens when both the sun and moon are in the sky at the same time. Logically this is not supposed to happen because a lunar eclipse happens when the moon passes directly behind the earth into the umbra shadow. The article writes this off as being due to light refraction causing the moon to look like it's up for a couple of extra minutes. One would think it would take much more than a couple of minutes to explain this.
Lets look at what science tells us about the sun, earth, and moon.
The earth spins at about 1000/mph.
The earth orbits the sun in one year, at a speed of 18/mps.
Here's where my science understanding gets weirded out on the current model.
The moon takes almost an entire month to orbit the earth. That's right a month. If that doesn't confuse you like it does me, carry on through the article.
The sun gets day and night in the heliocentric model through spinning. Pretend we are the sun and the above image is the earth. That ball is whirling around us and every continent facing us is expiriencing day time. When they face away it's night.
In our current model the moon is on the dark half for little more than a week and in the light half for little more than a week. Wouldn't you think there would be more than a week of moonless nights in the run of a month, instead of just one? When the moon is between the earth and sun, pitch black behind the earth should see no moon at all for an extended period of time.
That's what they tell us. 27 days for the moon to orbit the sun.
They say we get our lunar phases during this near month long orbit of the moon around the earth. See the new moon is completely black, while the moon is between the earth and sun. Really it should take the moon some 10-12 days to travel through the light half of the earth.
Scientifically speaking, a moonless night, according to the heliocentric model, only happens once a month. If it takes the moon almost a month to orbit earth why is there not a week of moonless nights on both sides?
Are these things making the heliocentric model impossible? Is it true we can be THIS blinded by science and lies?
Image credit goes to Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_deGrasse_Tyson#NASA Neil DeGrasse is an astrophysicist with a supposed genius understanding of the earth and space, and he has NEVER been to space to back his science.
I don't want anyone to take my word for it. I'm science illiterate. Really my assumptions could be foolishness based on lack of understanding. Instead, I would love for someone to explain how this works in the current model, as I can find little understanding to conquer this dilemma.
Is science hiding something?
Genisis 1:16
God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also.
The science in the above film has not been completely verified, but it's an interesting look into the science of CERN. Many suspect CERN of doing scientific research they aren't fully informing the public about. Lets dive in, an see if we can dig up some more information.
Image credit goes to Daily Mail UK.
CERN talks lightly about probing into other dimensions. Possibly to discover if more than space and time exists:
Some say CERN means something else by dimensions, but it's likely not so. Check the following article by DailyMail UK. They suggest CERN experiments with parallel universe science:
Some people feel CERN will open up a can of worms of biblical proportions. Quite literally. Theories range from portals that will usher in the Anti-Christ, to blowing a hold in the ground, opening up the pit of Apollyon.
Video credit goes to Scariest Movie Ever:
(Watch with discernment)
Clips from: US Congress, C-SPAN, Charlie Rose, CBI, CNBC,
Global Political Council Berlin, CNN, London Summit 2009, ABC,
LIFE Magazine, KSAT News https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo8fiE2-s0SZu6Onb8lNLMQ
The above mini documentary seemed crucial to share here on Red Sticker Blog. It's a montage of government officials talking about the new world order, while sharing some information on the groups involved, and the symbology of the colors red and blue. Feel free to check it out and share it with others.
Notice the officer talking about the red and blue mailbox sticker system. This is precisely where Red Sticker Blog derives its name from. If this officer is controlled opposition, or an externalizer, you have best be prepared for some rough times ahead.
Vigilant puts it best. It looks like Anonymous is suffering from controlled opposition syndrome. There are honest people in the movement, but beware the wolfs. One should be honest with themselves and have a look at where it all started.
Notice the Anonymous official logo has a striking resemblance to other government logos. They use the same reef as the United Nations logo, caged earth, stars, and an overall government type layout which sets off some red flags. Be careful Anonymous isn't a controlled opposition used to make good truthers look like terrorists. We don't need a mask to hide behind. Truthers aren't cowards. Lets throw down the mask and stand for the truth in complete freedom.
Remember, Anonymous started with a well orchestrated attack on Julian Assange's Wikileaks. I've written two articles on this already. For more information visit the following links.
Christine Lagarde, current managing director makes our globalist watch list for her role in the global agenda. She seems to be working from the money game when it comes to her side of the plan.
In the following video you can see her getting a Canadian globalist award:
It's hard to say what the date is related to, or if it's real, but we'll keep an eye for more information.
Fears of the conspiracy community: The IMF will be used as a tool to help control world currency. Also it is feared that people like Legarde will be helping to usher in the microchip, or similar banking function, that could act as a possible mark of the beast.
This blog post is highly conspiratorial, and not being pushed as an absolute truth. It's subjective in the sense that we're only reporting on what people have actually suggested. I did however dig in, and it certainly seems like it could be legitimate. Many are saying Gabby Giffords faked a gun shot wound to help support gun grab and Hilary Clinton. We'll get right into it.
Video credit goes to Truth Media Revolution:
Clips from: C-SPAN, CNN
(Watch with discernment.)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-mVGa_qBlTNOx5UzGFkVDQ
Apparently Gabby Giffords was shot in the head by Jared Lee Loughner.
"On January 8, 2011, Giffords was shot in the head[2] outside a Safeway grocery store in Casas Adobes, Arizona, a suburban area northwest of Tucson, during her first "Congress on Your Corner" (a public opportunity for constituents to speak directly with their representatives[42]) gathering of the year."
Also:
"The suspect, identified as Jared Lee Loughner,[46] was detained by bystanders until he was taken into police custody."
Here's where things get strange, and why people think something is up with the story.
That's right. Allegedly, one of the only people Giffords was following on her YouTube channel at the time was Jared Lee Loughner. Her supposed shooter.
Why is Gabby following her supposed shooter, who only posted up a couple of insane videos? Is he a real shooter, or is this entire shooting a controlled psyop? That's what the conspiracy community is wondering.
Nothing comes up in any major network about what kind of ammo was used. Actually, not a lot comes up about the Loughner trial at all. Actually, doing a YouTube search on his trial provides little evidence suggesting Loughner ever stood trial, other then artist renditions. Strange considering OJ got months of airtime, and even lesser knowns like Jeffery Dahmer got their entire trial aired. You would think we could get a few three minute clips.
I dunno people, but that's the bean soup for today. I guess we'll have to leave it as it is. Remember to dig around and see if there's any more information abroad.
Right now we're seeing the last half of the year unfold before presidential elections in the United States of America. Many are told to vote for Donald Trump. The issue is the lack of people who are actually discerning, who, and what this man works for. We'll go over this a bit throughout this post.
The following video suggests that Donald Trump is well aware of occult 911 symbology. Here is what looks like his wink and nod. Ladies and gentleman, Donald trump and the 911 sheep:
Donald waned to build a luxury golf course in one of the pristine lands of Scotland, but Forbes refused to be removed from his land, painting "No Golf Course" on his barn. Donald Trump ruined that land forever.
I had the pleasure of watching the story in the documentary titled, "You've Been Trumped." Find the trailer below:
After probing the science of our last post it seems there is logic in our current scientific knowledge. The barriers are capable of stopping electrons according to scientists, but not all matter. Apparently radio waves can travel through the barriers, as they are electromagnetic radiation. The same kind of radiation that makes up sunlight. This knocks out some credence to the conspiracy theory.
The only concepts that could give the barrier conspiracy any weight is if the flat earth folks are right, and the barrier is more solid than science is telling us. Scientists would be lying about quite a bit, as flat earth suggests the sun and moon would have to be closer than we're told. If the sun and moon were actually inside the fields it would explain travelling to the moon verses crossing solid barriers, but if the barriers can only stop electrons and other particles flat earth, once again, looks pretty shot. Well, that's what this blog is about. Not deceiving people, but studying for the truth. That's the truth as we see it. I'll end this post with another flat earth psyop warning and logical analysis.
Flat Earth Movement Analysis
I've made this comment before, but I'm going to share it with Red Sticker fans. I'm not trying to impede on true flat earthers, but the more I search for a reason to believe the conspiracy the less I find one. Is that a definitive reason not to believe one side or another? Of course not, but we have to be vigilant when searching for the truth. We can't let others say we're stupid for wanting answers amongst the lies.
Dubay wants us to believe the magic compass. He says people can't circumnavigate north and south because of government control, but east and west anyone can do it. He says the earth is flat, everyone circles the continents thinking they're going around the globe.
He has to be deliberately misleading people with this belief. Common sense tells you heading due west from America you're going to run into an ice wall instead of Japan. If there was really an ice wall the world would be talking about it all day, because anyone going west would find it. Also the Japanese crossed that sea when they bombed pearl harbour. That's well known history.
Google earth has a lot of science put into the globe. If you press cntl+l it will bring up the equator, lines of latitude, line of longitude, Capricorn, prime meridian, ect. If that system of navigation didn't work people would know. Longitude and latitude were around a long time before Google Earth. Educated people know about it. We learned about it in school. If you want to see if the earth is flat pick longitude and latitude coordinates for a point on your coast and travel there. Pick another point and travel there. If you end up where the destinations should be, or within a mile, you know the earth is a globe. Testing this will make it evident,as the flat earth map is distorted. Better yet, travel to Australia on the globe. Flat earth map has that way up northeast somewhere.
The flat earth map in the UN flag is easily explained with logical sense. It's a pole projection. People have been projecting maps since the 1800's. That's before any of us were in diapers, even the older folks reading this now weren't around in that era. It only makes sense that people making up the science would try a polar projection. Anyone would. It's the most artistic projection we have. I'm not a government advocate by any means, unless it's corruption free, but I find that to be honest about the matter.
B.O.B and Tila are two of the main proponents in the media supporting flat earth theory. B.O.B is signed to a major label, and so is Tila. Tila is a stripper that acts just like the epitome of the system. She isn't smart in that sense, and claims to be a truther. B.O.B is in a debate with Neil DeGrasse. Tell me why I shouldn't believe the whole thing isn't controlled, even B.O.B? Have you heard Obama's recent talk where he said "We don't have time for a meeting of the flat earther society."? What if that's what this is all about? Making truthers look stupid.
The only contradiction to the above analysis is if the controlled debate was a double whammy. If they knew the earth was flat, and they were trying to hide the truth, while using it to their benefit to make truthers look stupid. Still, it's a long shot.
Check out the following video by Vigilant Christian.
Can I say for certain what the shape of the earth is? Of course not. I would have to go to space and see it myself, but it's not fair to know this information and not share it.
Ladies and gentleman, we're going to look at new information unearthed in the truth community. I have to be honest, it's blowing my mind, but I lack the expertise to know what's coming to light here. The truth movement needs a scientist that isn't controlled by a major company. Sadly, they're hard to come by. Many scientists are controlled, and the ones who may be on the fringe may theoretically fear getting fired if they divulged information.
The following video is seriously worth some consideration. It's posted by 6 Million For Truth. The only information I can't seem to verify is whether NASA uses the flat earth map or not. On the other hand it's easy to confirm United Nations uses the polar projection in their flag.
The video above makes a point. On a globe map the closest route from South America follows the red line:
The actual trip follows this route on a globe:
I must admit in any case this is a strange flight. Europe is highly developed. They would have their own flights to Africa. South America would not need to go to Europe to pick up Europeans. There's hundreds of flights out of Europe to Africa.
Now. There's a hitch in his theory. Looking up flight route maps on Google maps shows there is at least one flight direct from South Africa to Brazil. I also located one on a flight website. I followed the steps up to the point where it asked for credit card information. It seems like you can most certainly book a flight that flies direct. The following process is from Johannesburg to Sao Paulo.
This casts some serious doubts into his theory, and quality of research, but then we also have this mind boggling bit on information directly from NASA. The entire video brings into question any trip made outside the earth's orbit:
They said themselves, in so many words, they can't go any farther than the short distance already travelled. This is a bit odd since so many flights have supposedly been made to the moon, since rovers were sent to Mars, and probes were sent into space. What happens if we explore the last half of the information talked about in the first video?
The above article talks about the newly found shield that blocks high energy electrons from entering into the earth's atmosphere. It's comprised of highly charged protons and electrons. This newly found shield makes for an interesting partner with the Van Allen Belts when it comes to space travel.
It says this shield starts roughly: 7,200 miles above the earth.
Of the shield it says the following:
"It's almost like theses electrons are running into a glass wall in space," said Baker. "Somewhat like the shields created by force fields on Star Trek that were used to repel alien weapons, we are seeing an invisible shield blocking these electrons. It's an extremely puzzling phenomenon."
It also says:
"It's not obvious how the slow, gradual processes that should be involved in motion of these particles can conspire to create such a sharp, persistent boundary at this location in space."
Finally:
"It's like looking at the phenomenon with new eyes, with a new set of instrumentation, which gives us the detail to say, 'Yes, there is this hard, fast boundary,'" said colleague John Foster from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Haystack Observatory.
That's right, you see it folks. A hard, fast boundary in space.
Some 7,200 miles above Earth, an invisible shield cloaking our planet is helping to protect us from damaging, super-fast “killer” electrons, scientists have found. This Star Trek style shield stops these whizzing electrons in their tracks, preventing them from harming astronauts and frying our satellites.
Also:
“It’s almost like these electrons are running into a glass wall in space,” lead author Professor Daniel Baker said in a news-release. “Somewhat like the shields created by force fields on Star Trek that were used to repel alien weapons, we are seeing an invisible shield blocking these electrons. It’s an extremely puzzling phenomenon.”
Here's a photo from NASA. Notice how they subtly hide the eye symbology in the photograph.
First off notice the strange title for the article itself.
NASA's Van Allen Probes Spot an Impenetrable Barrier in Space
Right off the bat they're calling the barrier impenetrable. Then right below it they're unsure. They say.
...the Van Allen radiation belts, have been found to contain a nearly impenetrable barrier that prevents the fastest, most energetic electrons from reaching Earth.
They need to make up their mind as to whether this thing is impenetrable or nearly impenetrable.
Basically throughout the article they go on about the Van Allen Belts, and very little about the finer details of this newly discovered barrier.
It does however say a couple of things, one quote follows:
Enter the newly discovered barrier. The Van Allen Probes data show that the inner edge of the outer belt is, in fact, highly pronounced. For the fastest, highest-energy electrons, this edge is a sharp boundary that, under normal circumstances, the electrons simply cannot penetrate.
At the magnetic equator, electrons of energies exceeding 500 keV (resp. 5 MeV) have omnidirectional fluxes ranging from 1.2×106 (resp. 3.7×104) up to 9.4×109 (resp. 2×107) particles per square centimeter per second.
The proton belts contain protons with kinetic energies ranging from about 100 keV (which can penetrate 0.6 µm of lead) to over 400 MeV (which can penetrate 143 mm of lead).
NASA's only defence found in the wiki page:
The Apollo missions minimised hazards for astronauts by sending spacecraft at high speeds through the thinner areas of the upper belts, bypassing inner belts completely.
Our Questions
What is this about NASA only being able to go so far? What is this Star Track like barrier, that seems to be like glass in some way, that stops electrons? Can a human, or a ship, even pass through the radiation belts and the electron stopping barrier? What happens when people and ships pass through highly charged protons and electrons, and the earth's magnetic field?
Image credit goes to Wikipedia. Use of this logo outside fair use may be considered copyright infringement. Please contact International Monetary Fund for other uses of their logo.
The IMF (International Monetary Fund) just got a new super power. In the following post we'll go over some of the new changes in their policy. It's pretty alarming to say the least. Another major player in the game giving itself, and being handed, some new super powers to wield over the masses.
Here are some quotes from IMF's Articles of Agreement:
Section 3. Immunity from judicial process
The Fund, its property and its assets, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall enjoy immunity from every form of judicial process except to the extent that it expressly waives its immunity for the purpose of any proceedings or by the terms of any contract.
Section 4. Immunity from other action
Property and assets of the Fund, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, requisition, confiscation, expropriation, or any other form of seizure by executive or legislative action.
Section 5. Immunity of archives
The archives of the Fund shall be inviolable. Section 6. Freedom of assets from restrictions
To the extent necessary to carry out the activities provided for in this Agreement, all property and assets of the Fund shall be free from restrictions, regulations, controls, and moratoria of any nature.
Let me paraphrase the above:
The IMF says, "We can do anything we want without getting charged. We can use our assets however we want without them getting seized. Our archives cannot be touched, and by the way don't touch our property we're gonna use that however we want too."
Image credit goes to America Humanist Association.
The american humanist association is an NGO at the United Nations. From what I can tell they pride themselves in being atheists. This is not the most troubling bit of information found while exploring their site. They give various definitions to Humanism, including a branch of Christian Humanism.
Christian Humanism: a philosophy advocating the self-fulfilment of man within the framework of Christian principles.
The issue is being Christian has nothing to do with self fulfilment. Christianity is built upon the principals of doing the Lord's will. God driven fulfilment, and not always about the individual. Even if they mean self fulfilling, as in not the human self, they should say so, as being more specific would make the quote less misleading.
More troubling is the amount of dedication they've given to Religious Humanism. Sadly, it's not hard to see where their allegiance lies in spiritual matters. They quote the Satanic book, titled The Satanic Verses twice.
Quoting The Satanic Verses by Salman Rushdie:
[My book says] that there is an old, old conflict between the secular view of the world and the religious view of the world, and particularly between texts which claim to be divinely inspired and texts which are imaginatively inspired. . . . I distrust people who claim to know the whole truth and who seek to orchestrate the world in line with that one true truth. I think that's a very dangerous position in the world. It needs to be challenged. It needs to be challenged constantly in all sorts of ways, and that's what I tried to do.
Testing God's word is obviously erroneous. I'm not suggesting the bible is fully God's word, but where's the wisdom in throwing the whole thing out the window? One must adhere to its truth.
The association says, don't worry, humanism is not solely negative, but also liberation.
quote:
When I became convinced that the universe is natural, that all the ghosts and gods are myths, there entered into my brain, into my soul, into every drop of my blood the sense, the feeling, the joy of freedom. The walls of my prison crumbled and fell. The dungeon was flooded with light and all the bolts and bars and manacles became dust. I was no longer a servant, a serf, or a slave. There was for me no master in all the wide world, not even in infinite space. I was free-free to think, to express my thoughts-free to live my own ideal, free to live for myself and those I loved, free to use all my faculties, all my senses, free to spread imagination's wings, free to investigate, to guess and dream and hope, free to judge and determine for myself . . . I was free! I stood erect and fearlessly, joyously faced all worlds.
Now we see the group advocates freedom in becoming unshackled from spiritual truth.
Of the above quote they say in their own words:
Enough to make a Secular Humanist shout "hallelujah!"
Again, they make it clear through their writing where their allegiance lies. They simply prefer atheism and Satanism over the idea of God. Even more dangerous in my mind is their school for teaching children! The humanist Education Center, where they sport the same logo, reading "Good Without God." as their slogan.
I would urge readers to pray for these kids, and those influencing their lives.
Another red flag is the banner at the bottom of the page. Supporting
Humanist Legal Center - Laws for humanists theoretically will end up being laws against Christians.
Boycott the pledge - This group would eradicate "In God we trust" and many other historical slogans our countries were built on. If one wants this to stop the government, and these groups, are the people to complain to.
Darwin Day - Evolution over creation. There are obvious problems here.
Humanist Education Center - Teaching kids in a humanist way. Theoretically, how to be good without God.
Robert is the first profile on our Globalist/New Age watch list. He makes his way into the list because of the ferocity at which he pushes the global agenda. He should be honored for his admiration in world wars, which protected us from enemies, but what many of us fear is work produced after the wars. Muller wrote and essay on "How to govern the world" which won him and internship in the United Nations. Muller focused the next 40 years of his life working behind the scenes
at the UN to develop his career. Eventually he rose to the official position of Assistant-Secretary-General, forming himself into a true UN leader.
He is acclaimed for writing "World Core Curriculum". There are 29 Robert Muller schools world wide, and more being built, which operate under his work. Why are Illuminati protesters worried about Muller and his curriculum? Because it has nothing to do with being secular, and thus is seen as a threat. It certainly goes against the governmental grain of being neutral to religion in state schools. We'll take a look at the core curriculum below:
Points of Interest
Everything human such as adults, youth, and races, labelled under Quantitative.
Everything to do with money, education, and earning, labelled under Qualitative.
Good moral lives. This suggest the curriculum will have a monopoly on what is and isn't moral.
Good spiritual lives, suggesting that school and education shall now have a monopoly on what is acceptable spiritually.
The religious outline can bee seen also in the figurative writing of the curriculum. Such as using terms like infinitely large when speaking of the universe, the infinitely small when speaking of microbes, and going as far as to say The World Of The Atom. Many new agers venerate the atom.
This all suggest that the UN is not against religion in the school system, but contrarily is very much FOR religion in the school system. The only problem is: Who's religion?
Another interesting note is Mr. Muller's self professed love for global government and a global system of politics. The idea permeates through much of his poetry.
Image credit goes to Robert Muller.
You can find more of his poems in the following website. They suggest a lot to his globalist, and new age/mystery religious, views.
The issue is not with the idea of world peace, but Muller has gone as far as to say that we can't have it without global government. He went as far as to say we could live just as peacefully in the World Republic as the Republic of The United States. We don't have to look at much US history to know there hasn't been much world peace, but rather much strife, protests, and government brutality.
Most of his Twitter followers are comprised of new agers, musicians, global government activists, and the likes:
There is good evidence these people are deceived, and need prayer to see the truth.
Danger of the global system comes from our warning in Christianity:
Revelation 13:77 It was also given to him to make war with the saints and to overcome them, and authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation was given to him.
Revelation 17:13 These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
One minders have given their allegiance to a one world system that will be ruled by the anti-christ, and many will worship the beast.
Sadly, many of these UN companies are infected by pro Luciferian Teachings by spiritual organizations such as Lucis Trust.
That's all on Robert Muller's profile.
Stay tuned for more of the New Age Globalist Watch List.
Video Credit goes to Info Wars http://www.infowars.com
(I do not follow Info Wars at all time, and suspect them as being controlled opposition.)
Remember when we signed up for websites and there was a privacy policy? Most of us have read one, at least once in our life. It used to say that our information would never be shared with anyone. These kinds of policies left us feeling safe online. It's starting to come to light that these types of privacy policies may be a thing of the past.
It's being said by some that websites like Facebook and Google Plus are sharing our information with various agencies around the world. It might be a good idea to start considering the consequences of our actions, especially when dealing with the online world. This kind of information can be very damning to some.
In the past our greatest threat online was a serial killer, or some homicidal maniac. Now, we might find, one of our greatest threats online are some of the people in our own system of government and law enforcement.
I'm going to blatant. We're all criminals. I don't condone crime, but we all do it. Do you know what the punishment is for even sharing one picture without permission of the content creator is? It can mean several years in prison and thousands of dollars in fines. Simple things we do online, without even realizing it, could justify our criminalization. It could be as simple as sharing a video from YouTube when that person has copyright material. This is enough to put one inline with an illegal broadcast.
There are two things people should consider doing when using the internet. First people should know the law, and stop committing crime online, second we should decide if we should use these services when they can give any conversation we have they want to the government and law enforcement. Both are important to online survival in the future.
One minute we're posting videos online, sharing images, and fighting the injustice in the government, the next we're sitting in prison. This is likely the system we can look forward to in the future.
Note - The video above can't be endorsed as absolute truth although I do personally believe that Disney has been used as a tool, and certainly know it contains messages that I myself have expirienced.
The video above shows more information into Disney movies and their connection to the Masons, as well as their possible employment of symbolism as part of a higher plan. Disney's founder, Walt Disney, was actually a member of the society himself.
The only part of the video I don't agree with is what they think Aladdinis saying. When my first girlfriend, fifteen or so years ago, showed me this, I heard "Good teenagers, take off your clothes."
_(cropped).jpg/220px-Lagarde%2C_Christine_(official_portrait_2011)_(cropped).jpg)
