Flat Earth: Questioning Science

Video credit goes to marksargent:
Posted by Leisureex
(Watch with discernship)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkXE1MAyvawOySf9Jddaang

Remember, everything I post as flat earth is speculation and conspiracy. It's not necessarily a conspiracy that I endorse as a personal belief. I'm also not qualified to verify the facts.

In the above documentary Mark goes over some the conspiracies pertaining to the flat earth. It covers the idea of the dome, and the fact that he feels it exists.

The question continues. Did NASA and the government pull a fast one over us, and hide the secrets of our existence? Christians might ask: Does the firmament exist?

Genesis 1:1
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

Job 37:18
Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?

Scale models of the universe have proved imperfect.

The above image shows a scale sun from the earth's perspective to be much smaller than the actual sun (Based on To Scale's calculation.)

Where is the difference made up? Is it fixed by deciding the sun is bigger and farther away, or smaller and closer? It's hard to say without inside knowledge of absolute truth.

Image credit goes to IBtimes:
http://www.space.com/27338-total-lunar-eclipse-rare-sunrise-selenelion.html

The above image is from an article describing a Selenelion lunar eclipse. This happens when both the sun and moon are in the sky at the same time. Logically this is not supposed to happen because a  lunar eclipse happens when the moon passes directly behind the earth into the umbra shadow. The article writes this off as being due to light refraction causing the moon to look like it's up for a couple of extra minutes. One would think it would take much more than a couple of minutes to explain this.

Lets look at what science tells us about the sun, earth, and moon.

The earth spins at about 1000/mph.

The earth orbits the sun in one year, at a speed of  18/mps.

Here's where my science understanding gets weirded out on the current model.

The moon takes almost an entire month to orbit the earth. That's right a month. If that doesn't confuse you like it does me, carry on through the article.

The sun gets day and night in the heliocentric model through spinning. Pretend we are the sun and the above image is the earth. That ball is whirling around us and every continent facing us is expiriencing day time. When they face away it's night.

In our current model the moon is on the dark half for little more than a week and in the light half for little more than a week. Wouldn't you think there would be more than a week of moonless nights in the run of a month, instead of just one? When the moon is between the earth and sun, pitch black behind the earth should see no moon at all for an extended period of time.

That's what they tell us. 27 days for the moon to orbit the sun. 

Image credit goes to astronomy stack exchange:

http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/8042/moonless-night-and-lunar-phase

They say we get our lunar phases during this near month long orbit of the moon around the earth. See the new moon is completely black, while the moon is between the earth and sun. Really it should take the moon some 10-12 days to travel through the light half of the earth. 

Scientifically speaking, a moonless night, according to the heliocentric model, only happens once a month. If it takes the moon almost a month to orbit earth why is there not a week of moonless nights on both sides?

Are these things making the heliocentric model impossible? Is it true we can be THIS blinded by science and lies?

Image credit goes to Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_deGrasse_Tyson#NASA

Neil DeGrasse is an astrophysicist with a supposed genius understanding of the earth and space, and he has NEVER been to space to back his science. 

Image credit goes to Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus#Heliocentrism

Nicolaus Copernicus was a genius on the heliocentric model some 450 years before it could EVER be proved with space flight.

I don't want anyone to take my word for it. I'm science illiterate. Really my assumptions could be foolishness based on lack of understanding. Instead, I would love for someone to explain how this works in the current model, as I can find little understanding to conquer this dilemma.

Is science hiding something?

Genisis 1:16

God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also.