Okay, I'm starting to get the feeling NASA is one of the biggest government psyop ever perpetrated on mankind. I can't say for certain they haven't been to space, or never launched any rockets, but it sure does look like someone's up to funny business. Don't know what a psyop is? It's when the government runs secret tests on your mind. Wiki it. For now, we're just going to enjoy the starless skies of space.
No stars!
No stars!
No stars!
Pretty!
No stars!
No stars! Wait a minute! Is his visor up? And the world is lit, right? So the sun is up!? What an idiot! Or am I an idiot for wondering why his eyes aren't burning out of his head? Lets see how hot it is facing the sun. 121 degrees celsius according to NASA:
No stars! Like it matters. Looks like the word's in for a super storm, anyway.
No stars on the moon either!
No stars!
No stars! Odd lighting for Apollo 11, considering they never took any with them.
No stars!
No stars! Glad to see the top of the earth is lit. Anyone know where the sun is?
No stars! So, that's how they kept the flag straight on Apollo. They put a stick in it. And you morans thought there was some kind of conspiracy going on.
Oh! There's some stars! Thanks for turning on the lights NASA. Has anyone seen that green reflective glow over the earth before? Must be something God implemented post 2000.
.
Apparently stars don't mind the sun, either. They like the sun and the green forcefield! If that's even the sun. Looks more like an oblong spheroid!
Hey, there's some stars in this one too. Check out the neat lens flares in the lower right! I mean super close star like things. They're part of the little dipper, right? Nibiru fans are probably going nuts down there, eh? Oh, and can you spot the nuclear meltdown right of the space nozzle?
More sun time stars! I could swear that's a lens flare. What are you guys building down there!? Anyone know what those purple buildings are for? They're probably the atomic green houses.
Here comes the storm troopers!
Are these guys pretending to pretend to do the real thing before they pretend to do the real thing for real?
Readers know I've been exploring the flat earth theory. After searching this for hours I came into some information, as well as saw some clear signs myself, that part of the flat earth movement could be a psyop. There are people who believe that the earth is flat, don't get me wrong, and they're entitled to explore for truth. The flat earth theory was around before Copernicus, who helped revolutionize the globe theory, and yes there were people who debated him on it. People thought Newton was nuts for coming up with gravity, and argued density was the cause of any fall. This true flat earth argument gives the psyop some ground to stand on.
Recently some mainstream artists have come into the debate. This is something that is making me question the validity of the movement. After all, there are many mainstream artists that seem to be involved with masonic secret society movements. Will I Am doing a trip to CERN, Jay-z with his Alister Crowley t-shirt throwing up the pyramid, and Marilyn Manson burning bibles of stage with his church of Satan connections. It's obvious their is corruption in the mainstream, some of them may very well be a part of the secret society corruption, and in my mind are. I would personally say they are, and not bite my tongue on some, but we are still libel without conclusive proof.
Two mainstream proponents of the flat earth movement in the mainstream are rapper B.O.B and singer Tila Tequila. I have to question if they can be trusted, and I have seen things that threw up red flags in my mind. If you asked me personally, I would say no, don't trust them always. I personally think they are very much involved on some level with what's going on.
Quite Frankly Tila is not the truth, and I have warned about her in another post. In the above picture she is glorifying Nazis. She has taught her fans teachings right in line with something straight out of the white brotherhood, and other initiate circles. Read the entire article at the following link if you'd like: http://redstickerblog.blogspot.ca/2014/11/tila-tequila-truther-externalizer-or.html
B.O.B is signed by Atlantic. Just yesterday he was using then United Nations logo as his Twitter logo, of all things, while exposing the so called Flat Earth. The issue I have with this is that the United Nations logo is NOT free to use. You have to get explicit written permission, and I could not see his record label, the same label allowing him to blatantly commit this Copyright infringement on his Twitter, and public persona. Atlantic also signed James Blunt, Bruno Mars, Bow Wow, Coldplay, and many others. They're no small time label. B.O.B is in a live "battle" or debate with astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse. These TV spats are easy to coordinate, and aren't hard to fabricate and perpetuate to the public.
There ARE some symbologies in his videos that he has used that look like masonic fraternal works, which could stand as a warning to viewers. It doesn't hurt to mention them:
Notice the black and white chequered floor? I would not be surprised if this IS a masonic lodge, or a building masons have their hand in, but I'm not sure. Right afterwards there is a pyramid reference where he puts up a pyramid hand signal. Is he only talking about pyramids, or is this in some way a wink and nod?
Another good point is their content:
(Language Warning)
Notice the all seeing eye in the flying saucer to the right of Niki Minaj?
The video paints an image that is the main point to the psyop, as I heard. Notice B.O.B could be mistaken for painting this image of truthers: "Bi-polar, needs meds, and out of his mind." Niki on the other hand, well I'm not sure what her role is to be honest. The floozy? These are not good voices for a movement that wants to prize itself on truth.
Here's how it could, theoretically, tie into a flat earth psyop:
What happens if the earth is not flat, and the government has everyone arguing about it? This would be a perfect tool against the truth movement to cause division, and dumb it down. It's gives them the ability to say "Look, these people are flat brainers, they can't think logically, and certainly can't be trusted on anything." It also gives them the perfect tool to dumb down the masses. What better way to make people revert down to slave mentality then to have them argue about something stupid that can't be proven? All of a sudden there is no concept of gravity, science, and people look no farther, because in their minds it's not real. You have groups going back to the stone ages and studying density over the proponent of gravity. This is of course, if the earth is round.
Why doesn't the flat earth modal work in a scientific sense? People say you can see star trails around Polaris in the north, and Sigma in the south. They are the pole stars. On the equator you can see star trails to the north and south, according to sources. One set circles clockwise, the other counter-clockwise. This seems most logical on a globe. On the flat map you have Australia, Africa, and South America all off in different directions. South on each is a completely different direction. How could you see star trails circling Sigma on all three while looking south?
After all a lot of work has been put into the globe. The numbers seem to work. Google earth shows almost everything when you press control+l, including the equator, and lines of latitude and longitude. How can such scientific number crunching be wrong, right? (That is if the globe model is not designed to simply work, of course. We have to assume the minds that made computers are smarter than ours, no big deal to make a system that just works. All you need to know is the size of the balls, the rings they follow in orbit, and any genius can calculate our day and year to it.)
Here's where it gets confusing. Does NASA fake footage. Yes, it's obvious. They fake earth's rotation footage, they give us numerous different looking CG globes, the moon landings use harnesses, and it's getting to look unlikely they've ever even been in space. All you have to do is look at the evidence. It's stacked overwhelmingly against them at times.
The following image is from Galileo, showing earth's spin and moon orbit over 15 frames. Looks like they need to work on their CG. Clouds don't move, and the moon isn't spinning.
Here's a shot from the moon!
Here's another!
Neat!
And one more!
Wow, these guys are good. Looks like the earth is coming in for a close call.
And Earth's rotation caught by Galileo over a 25 hour period. 25 Hours and not a single cloud changes!
So the question is Why? This is 2016. They shouldn't have satellite data to make composites out of, and weird images from the 60's. By all means, with today's technology, there should be 100's if not thousands of straight up pictures from satellites. We should have 1080p full HD movie clips of the earth spinning in real time. Not crummy freeze frame animations. There should be no excuses. If we can strap a camera to a balloon why can't they just get one of their $70,000 video recordings to take some movies of the earth? I heard it said we should have a cable channel dedicated to earth's spin since we have all this technology, but yet we're still fed 90% garbage.
There are only a few explanations. We'll entertain the logical one first:
NASA is a government agency corrupted by the new world order initiates. They can't do space travel because it's impossible. The earth spins 1000 miles an hour, it orbits the sun over 5 million miles in a year, and the moon they say they landed on is spinning around us at a speed of over 2000 miles an hour. Average bullets travel at 1700/mph. They would have to learn to fly in near weightless space while controlling a ship being pulled in every other direction by all gravitational forces, and land on things going really fast, while dodging space debris that flies at light speeds. Can you even get to an object that's moving 2000 miles an hour? Also they want us to believe they can make a sun probe that can sail in million mile an hour sun winds, and stand a temperature of 1 million degrees celsius while they probe the sun's corona? Maybe they just can't do it. Either that, or they can do some space work, and fabricate others. In this theory a good bit of the money is getting funnelled into other government organizations, the pentagons mystery trillion dollar budget, and other government new world order plans. It wouldn't be hard to hide. You have the side of NASA they will show anyone, and any president, and then you have the paper work the initiates hide under the desk when ever they need to. If an outside president is elected they halt operations, and only work on what they can through inner circles.
This next one is for the flat earthers. Yes, some exist outside a psyop, don't let anyone tell you flat earth is a psyop as the debate as been around forever. I'm not saying there is no psyop, just not the entire thing is one.
Here goes:
NASA can't fly in space and the earth is not what they say, or they have seen it from space, and refuse to show us the truth. The sky is a phenomenon that we can't explain. In this kind of flat earth model anything could go. The sky is an act of God that we cannot easily map. In this model you can see Sigma looking south from Australia, Africa, and South America, even though these countries look off in complete different directions. The sky is not as it seems, and neither is the world.
That's the culmination of my research. I'm sure you guys aren't much less confused than I am, but that's all there is to it. Hard to say if any of us will ever know the truth without going to space ourselves. One thing I would like readers to take away from this post is that we should never let this divide us from what we have verified without a shadow of a doubt. Many artists are corrupt, the government is corrupted in many places, and the power elites in many secret societies cannot be trusted.
This might be a stretch, as I'm no astronomer, but we're going to look at some simple ideas to entertain the mind. First we're going to consider the constellations. They don't change much over time. I'm pretty sure we see the same stars in the sky year round, except maybe a few constellations change in visibility. This seems illogical to me in a heliocentric model, so we'll explore the idea.
Check out Eric Dubay's video on star trails. Star trails are a phenomenon that show how stars rotate around the north star, or Polaris, in the northern hemisphere. For those not world savvy that's visible by everyone in the top half of the world. Canada and America for instance would see this just fine in their night's sky. All it takes is a little stop motion animation with a decent camera.
Notice how the video puts this nicely. Polaris is about stationary to our pole and the stars circle around it.
Here's where the logic gets tricky. According to modern science, and likely our good folks at NASA, our earth is doing some pretty amazing things. It's spinning in a circle at 1000/mph. They claim that it's tilted, and wobbling. That's not all though. We're also travelling around the sun in orbit. This is no twenty minute hike for our world. It's a whopping 5,000,000 miles! We're also moving at lighting speeds. 18 miles per second. That's incredible. Simply incredible!
If tiled, spinning, wobbling, and moving 5,000,000 miles around the sun, how is that we see the same stars in the night's sky unmoved? How is it every night they do the same circle around Polaris? Why is the big dipper still the big dipper in the first 5,000 miles, and not the little soup pan by the 4 millionth mile? Tell me if I'm wrong, but that doesn't sound possible. They also tell us the entire system is shaking about, like food in a blender. Why don't we detect the movement in star light? If it was merely distance you would think we would see previous shakes, like flashlights being moved about in the sky.
That's science. They say we're moving a lot of billions of millions of billions, but how so? How on earth do the stars continue to circle Polaris, and how on earth do we not get skewed angels of vision on our constellations? I hope this science is more logical than evolution, and no I don't believe in evolution. If not, our books are in for some major changes.
"The person who discovered that the stars move was the great British astronomer Edmond Halley, who also has a famous comet named after him. Almost 300 years ago he noticed that a few stars in charts made by Greek sky watchers were not in quite the same location anymore. Those charts were more than 1600 years old then, and even over that time, the bright stars Sirius, Arcturus, and Aldebaran had shifted position only slightly."
How do we know that it's not just the stars that have moved? Also movement was observed in different ways in different time periods. In 100 AD Ptolemy, another Greek astronomer, believed the sun and stars were moving. Even people today consider this geocentric model as viable, claiming observation has proved science wrong.
Here's another quote from the NASA article:
"Besides their motion, the appearances of stars change as they age. Take my favorite constellation Scorpius, for example. A couple of years ago, the middle of the three stars that make the head of the scorpion became brighter. The constellation now has a new look!"
I wonder if they notice these observations, but because they have built on bad science, they think the outcomes are of different causes than actually caused them. Being a Christian gives me a different view of the world, allowing for God controlled change, but of course this will not work in everyone's view.
Really, can we trust NASA? Can we trust an organization that taught us everything there is to know about the sun years before they ever went there? They still haven't gone yet by the way. Can we trust them to tell us the truth about Solar Probe Plus? I would really love to hear more about this magic fuel supply for a 186 million mile journey to the sun, how they plan on getting there unhindered, and maybe their magic 186 million mile internet data relay system, and of course the magic paint they're going to use to keep it from burning up in the million degree Celsius temperatures. That's not to mention the slick sailing their going to have to do to get through the supposed million mile an hour winds they claim whip around the celestial star. I'm glad I'm not sailing a boat at sea in those winds, I'd end up torn to splinters and likely somewhere in Hong Kong. Trust me the rough winter seas are enough to turn you around in the Bay of Funday. 40-50/mph is enough. A million and your over the horizon.
Occult NASA
This is an interesting video. I'm not sure what I make of the idea of project blue beam, or if I even believe in it, but this has interesting information on NASA and their occult ties. Readers might be surprise about how little they know about the space agency and the spirit behind it. Lets not forget the number of high level masons involved.
You might want to wonder why the government wants you to believe in aliens.
I've been experimenting with the flat earth theory. This is something I'm doing as a hobby, and don't want anyone to think it's something I prescribe to, but even now, after writing this, I must admit that I am almost ready to accept it. Full heartedly. At the end you may see why. This has been an amazing journey. If I'm wrong I'd like someone to explain this to me, and I will gladly withdraw my position.
The above map is interesting. It's said to have been published by Buffalo Electrotype and Engraving Co, Buffalo N.Y, U.S.A. It depicts the world as being flat and encircled by a ring of ice. The ring of ice is common in the flat earth theory, but we'll get to that later. Lets explore the map a little more. The following is a Google search of the company.
I'll be honest. There's not much to go on, but it's not a complete dead lead. Sadly, most of the links are referring to this map, such as this government link from Library of Congress, in the United States.
"Gleason, Alex. Is the Bible from heaven? Is the earth a globe? 2d ed., rev. and enl. Buffalo, N.Y., Buffalo Electrotype and Engraving Co. [1893] xix, 402 p. illus., map, col. plates, ports. QB638.G56"
If fact that entire page is dedicated to flat earth. Too bad there isn't more information on the map. Not finding anything on the company means it either didn't exist, or it did not get very big. We won't let that discourage us. This is going to get plenty of interesting. Believe me.
You might find it interesting that the UN's own flag is also this flat earth model.
Why? An inside joke? Or do they have something to hide? Well, if you're interested in this already, you're going to learn a lot from the following montage. We'll cover the science first, and then we'll get into the theory. Some of you might be thinking, science, are you kidding!? There's still science for the flat earth? You might be surprised to learn that there has never NOT been science for the flat earth. Thousands of years ago most everyone believed the earth was flat, it was not until modern science, and pre-modern science (in a time period when it could not be proved) that the earth was turned into a globe. We'll cover it all over the next few minutes.
Fair warning: The videos are long, but most of the best info is in the first 40 minutes of each.
US Navy Missile Instructor Confirms Flat Earth
In the video above a US Navy Missile Instructor admits that he's been considering the flat earth theory. He also suggest that curvature, as per our current science, is proved false by a 2 inch beam reaching targets at 50 miles, and a 2 degree pencil beam at that. He also mentions seeing ships at 27 nautical miles while being told in training the horizon is at 15.
Career Commercial Land Surveyor: No Curvature Calculated
Very interesting video. Surveyors are taught to work from a flat plane. They never take into account the curvature according to this video. The surveyor said he never noticed it, but then he thought about large cities. Eventually these chessboards of flat planes bumping up against each other would have to take into account the curvature. Consider an entire city built by surveyors going on their lessons of working from a flat plane. Doesn't make sense in a curved world, right?
US Navy Chief: What Curvature?
The surface of the water, according to mainstream science, follows the curve of the globe. This Navy chief suggests curvature is not accounted for. He also suggests pilots flying large distances also do not adjust for the curvature.
Retired US Air Force Navigator
The above video contains an individual that is well decorated, including a masters in space. He makes the claim that the horizon must recede on a globe, but this has never been observed in his work. Astrophysicist Shuns Flat Earth
The above video is hilarious. An astrophysicists shuns a flat earth query and gives perfect slope for explanation of curvature.
I'd like to say this is the tip of the ice berg (this will become a pun not too long from now.) There are many professionals out there that are now coming out about believing in a flat earth. We'll carry on though. Lets get into the interesting stuff. From here on out information will be part truth, and part theory. I have to give my usual warning. There is some religion involved with areas of the flat earth community. I do not subscribe, nor do I suggest anyone else subscribe, to anything outside Christianity. Please be careful in this sense.
Time Lapse Of World
The above video suggests that NASA has been faking time lapses of the world. Consider the second one shown where clouds do not even move.
Masonic Sun Worshippers
The above video covers masonic astronauts, and the masonic scientists involved in the globe system.
Manic Art Proves Flat Earth
The above video suggests the oldest, and farthest reaching fraternity, is well aware of the flat earth. At the highest levels of course. Remember these guys have a temple in every town and city from here to Jerusalem, where they have set up right beside temple mount.
What's the key to the edges? Antarctica. It's a ring of ice around the world! People like to point out that all Antarctica images from satellite are composites, and that there are no real space images of Antarctica. Some people consider the idea that they may be hiding Antarctica for other reasons.
The following image is a picture of Antarctica treaty meeting area. Some say the entire building is designed after the truth, and the blue surrounding the earth is a depiction of the ice walls. After finding truth about Antarctica the government formed NASA, and both Russia and America did high altitude nuclear bomb tests called "Operation Fish Bowl." Interesting naming convention.
Now we get into the idea of how they keep us from the truth of our earth, should of course this conspiracy be the truth. The obvious is indoctrination. They teach us as kids that the earth is round. They use fake NASA footage, and avoid areas such as Antarctica altogether, and well, they control the flow of traffic.
The image above shows shipping lanes. On a flat earth model one would say they are all intercontinental, and no one is going above, or below, a certain point.
The image above is flight paths from satellite imaging. Notice the same thing. On a flat earth model the flights are all intercontinental. No one is flying above a certain point, and no one is flying below.
Now here is where I'm going to blow your mind with my own personal research, as if the other stuff I've showed you shouldn't have do so already.
Check these images out again.
The above image is on an article dated 2014.
The above image is dated 2009.
It's interesting that satellite images render ice, that is really no bigger than the width of America, as something that stretches the entire length of the world. Is it possible this is because it's on the bottom of a sphere? Or is it because that massive chunk of ice stretches as far as the eye can see?
The above map is dated 1652. This is about 109 years after Copernicus introduced the heliocentric model. Take note of where Antarctica would be in current maps. In its place is a land named Magalantic, and it stretches the length of the bottom of the world. Some people say Magalantic was a mythical land of the old times.
Here's another old map dated 1570. This on the other hand is a mere 27 years after Copernicus introduced the heliocentric model. Notice nothing changed about the massive lower land mass but the name. Back then they were contemplating Australis.
Now the mind blowing part of this entire thing. This is provided from NASA itself.
"Composite map of the world assembled from data acquired by the Suomi NPP satellite in April and October 2012. Credit: NASA Earth Observatory/NOAA NGDC"
See what I see? A wall of ice above, a wall of ice below. Strange considering the data is from April to October. These are spring to fall months in the north. It's the same depictions printed from satellite as all the old maps. Also look at the sheer amount of ice they are showing for the north pole. Shouldn't this be tiny? Not world wide.
Here's another.
Notice again this image shows the ice walls at both ends of the earth. See the globe in the bottom left? Now look at the top of the world. The north is already rounded, but the satellite is showing much more ice, in fact, another world wide stretch.
Here's another.
And another.
The north is only small on Google earth.
How about flights at the bottom of the world?
None. Is it because it's too long of a haul? Maybe it's a safety issue, or all the major land masses are more accessible through northern routes or near the equator. If not, maybe it's because the bottom of the world really the edge of the world.
Above is an image from ISS (Internation Space Station) control. See how the screen calmly shows its workers the massive ice north and south?
Above is Russian control. It also shows the same ice.
If I'm not scientifically wrong about this ice wall, remember how they kept it a secret.
The flow of traffic, and some would say, and the end of a gun.
"More recently, the combination of nuclear energy theory, laboratory experiments, and better solar observations has enabled scientists to obtain a good picture of the overall structure of the Sun. It is a ball of gas, composed of about 90 percent hydrogen, 9 percent helium, and only 1 percent of all the other elements such as carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, and iron. The diameter of the Sun is about 1,390,000 kilometers (865,000 miles), or about 109 times that of the Earth, and the Sun is 300,000 times as massive as the Earth."
The quote above is very interesting. Thanks for telling us all about the sun NASA.
The following quote will teach you how they know what's at the center of the sun, what kind of fuel it burns, and what percentage of these fuels are used in over all consumption.
"We are going to visit a living, breathing star for the first time," says program scientist Lika Guhathakurta of NASA Headquarters."
Going to the sun for the first time, good to know.
These quotes are from the same article.
Mystery #1—the corona: If you stuck a thermometer in the surface of the sun, it would read about 6000o C. Intuition says the temperature should drop as you back away; instead, it rises. The sun's outer atmosphere, the corona, registers more than a million degrees Celsius, hundreds of times hotter than the star below. This high temperature remains a mystery more than 60 years after it was first measured.
Well that's an interesting mystery. When was the previous article written?
Published in 2012. Okay, we're still good. Lets not worry about it. NASA can be trusted, right?
Mystery #2—the solar wind: The sun spews a hot, million mph wind of charged particles throughout the solar system. Planets, comets, asteroids—they all feel it."
Okay, what next?
"To solve these mysteries, Solar Probe+ will actually enter the corona," says Guhathakurta. "That's where the action is."
Alright. Probe Plus will enter the corona, where NASA just told us the temperatures reach a million degrees celsius, and there are million degree winds? That's pretty hot. Lets check out our periodic table for a second, and see what they're going to make this thing out of. They're going to need some pretty tough temperature resistant material. Not to mention the winds. Houses blow apart in 200/mph plus winds.
Well, cars are made of iron or something, but that has a melting point of about 1500 degrees. Nickel wouldn't be much use melting at a lower temperature of around 1400 degrees. Man, too bad we didn't have some mythril. Titanium! That's the next best thing, right? Well, sort of. It hasn't got the highest known melting point, but even titanium is useless since it will melt at less than 1700 degrees. We're running out of options, people. Carbon is the highest on the period table, and that's burning up at 3500 degrees.
Ugh, lets just face it. They're not using a raw material. Obviously they're inventing something right? They better be. It's going to be hot up there!
Don't worry though! Solar Probe Plus has a thermal shield.
Okay, so what's the point of the article? JB's talking crazy again. I know, I know, I can write things pretty confusing. Here's the point. The article about Probe Plus it's dated 2008. So!? So! In the article of 2012 they were telling us what the sun burned for fuel down to the percentile, and how hot the corona was, and showed us what the core looks like. Maybe they do know, Lets give them the benefit of the doubt. Surely by 2012 they know all this by now, right?
Wrong!
The answer comes from the launch date of Solar Probe Plus.
That's right THE FIRST probe is due to launch in 2 years. Looks at watch. Do you think NASA hires psychics too?
Edit:
This article is being edited because NASA said in the same article they were going to test from a distance away where temperatures were 1400 degrees celcius. This is much more logical, but only goes to show they can't help themselves but to lie in the same article, or simply just need to learn to write. One minute they write the corona is 1,000,000 degrees celsius, that they'll be entering the corona, and the next minute they say they're going where it's 1400 degrees celcius. NASA should really make up their mind.
There's many reasons why the mainstream is working to slander Christians. Some of it is unrelated to any specific reason, but I believe a lot of it is due to the conspiracy most of us are talking about. There's groups of individuals looking to destroy any religion that isn't there own. They believe in the occult way of life, and anything that falls outside of it is heresy.
We see mainstream movies making fun of Christians, and they're all run on the major networks. Cartoons are doing the same, and most them are run on the same networks. TV has been a tool for this for a long time. Ever since the rich elitists worked on getting it installed into the homes. The best thing here is to stop watching it, or in the least, if people are going to watch anyway, have the discernment not to fall for the lies.
The other important sector of this is people within the government. These people are attacking Christians within the senate. It's ridiculous some of the words these people are saying. I was watching a video and one man within senate had used the term "Go back to the nunnery", when talking about morals that weren't inline with his own. I'm not sure of his religious standing, but even as an athiest, it was spoken like a true Luciferian.
The root of this problem might emanate from Lucis Trust. In the least the company operating within the United Nations doesn't help. They're on of the players in the new age/occult movement. Why are they so dangerous to Christians? The answer is simple, they want to assimilate them, and some are thinking if they can't achieve this, destroy them. The second thing that makes them so dangerous is that they hold meetings in the United Nations meditation room. Simply put, they teach those within the government, that would listen to their message, that Christians, or in the least, Christianity, must be wiped off the face of the planet.
For those who want to learn a bit more about their history I'll leave an edited version of a comment below, that I created for someone on YouTube. Feel free to read it, as there's lots to be learn.
There's plenty of evidence for occult conspiracy. Many just don't accept evidence where evidence is due. It's right in front of us, but they don't take it. The anagram on the money that spells out mason? The pyramid, with the eye, and in all those places? It can be found from MTV commercials, and America, all the way to Jerusalem.
Occult has a place in the world, and it's not the same as Christianity, or other religions, who are open about their faith. They pride themselves of secrecy, and have the credo "keep secret things secret." You have to hunt for them to find them. The information is available though.
Alice Bailey started Lucifer Trust. It was later changed to Lucis Trust. Look at what they say about Lucifer on their site. Lucis Trust: Esoteric Meaning of Lucifer
"Alice and Foster Bailey were serious students and teachers of Theosophy, a spiritual tradition which views Lucifer as one of the solar Angels, those advanced Beings Who Theosophy says descended (thus “the fall”) from Venus to our planet eons ago to bring the principle of mind to what was then animal-man. In the theosophical perspective, the descent of these solar Angels was not a fall into sin or disgrace but rather an act of great sacrifice, as is suggested in the name “Lucifer” which means light-bearer."
They're an NGO (accredited non-governmental organization) at United Nations
1. The reorganisation of the world religions—if in any way possible—so that their out-of-date theologies, their narrow-minded emphasis and their ridiculous belief that they know what is in the Mind of God may be offset, in order that the churches may eventually be the recipients of spiritual inspiration.
- AKA Narrow minded Christians and others like them MUST think like us new age pagan/Luciferian/satanists, or they can't be accepted. Here theology is referred to as not only "out of date", but also "ridiculous". Notice they teach these religions need to be reorganized in any way possible.
2. The gradual dissolution—again if in any way possible—of the orthodox Jewish faith, with its obsolete teaching, its separative emphasis, its hatred of the Gentiles and its failure to recognise the Christ. In saying this I do not fail to recognise those Jews throughout the world who acknowledge the evils and who are not orthodox in their thinking; they belong to the aristocracy of spiritual belief to which the Hierarchy itself belongs.
- aka destroy Jewish faiths except for the ones who are part of our cult thinking, because of their dissolution. This goes to show they are aware of occult practicing Jewish sects. I can think of one: Kabbalah.
3. Preparation for a revelation which will inaugurate the new era and set the note for the new world religion.
- aka get the world ready for new world religion, which will be brought in based on some "revelation"
1. The Reorganisation of the World Religions.
Reasons
a. To make way for the World Religion, universal religion.
b. To return humanity to the simplicity which is in Christ.
c. To rid the world of theology and ecclesiasticism.
2. The Gradual Dissolution of Orthodox Judaism.
- Aka bring in our cult and destroy Christianity, Muslims, and all other God based religions. One might think, why have they mentioned "Christ" but yet want to get rid of theology? It's because their Christ is not Jesus, it's who they believed Jesus to be. They teach Jesus was an ascended master, also known to some as a Buddha. They don't teach Christ as the son of God, but more or less another great sorcerer of their occult tradition.
Okay, so you get the picture you can read the book, as the link was supplied. Lets move on. Our next stop is the theosophical society. Check out their building. They are well established in many major countries, and can be found if only one looks.
They were created by H.P Blavatsky, and a couple of others, who was also Alice Bailey of Lucis Trust's mentor. She is responsible for a number of occult books including Isis Unveiled, and Secret Doctrine. Secret doctrine vol 2 works quite hard to un-demonize Satan, as they believe him to be, and slander the church, for what they feel is their ridiculous notions on what Satan is.
You can sift through the book. The entire thing is pretty much occult satanic principles.
So there you have it. Occult connected to the government. Lets look a little deeper through. Who is one of the most famous females on TV? Oprah. A lot of what she teaches is connected. Oprah push's "Christ Consciousness". Well, this term is straight from Alice Baily, read her books. The new age movement IS a part of this new world religion. It's just a cluster of paganism, all welcome, even Christians, so long as they shed their "disillusioned beliefs".
Notice how the first book in the list is Secret Doctrine. Then we have books by Alister Crowley, followed by a book on the Satanic ritual Abramelin, or teacher of it. I wonder if this is where we get the magic term "abra cadabra." It's not hard to see who the most important people are in the occult world. It seems to be those who have taught that Satan is not evil.
There are tons of occult groups in the world: Masons, Knights of Malta, Rosicrucians, Opus Dei, Order of The Golden Dawn, and many many more. If there are masons in every community, and when you look for them you see many of them are established peoples, we might think what are they up to, or what are groups of them up to? We can only find glimpses of it in our history.
Then you have SMALLER groups: Shriners, Rotary, and the likes. The list goes on. Of course there's a conspiracy amongst the most powerful of them all, and the groups that are connected pushing their like minded goals, whether they fully understand the implications or them or not. Read the words of David Rockefeller:
"Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure---one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." - From Memoirs of David Rockefeller.
If they can admit they're apart of this secrecy, why can't others? Remember, we have the coming banking chip, which in many ways is a spitting image of revelations. If this is the mark of the beast we have to be on guard. We can't allow ourselves to be taken by their system, or worse, end up in hell for choices God may have warned about a few thousand of years ago.
If one wants to understand God, the devil, and people who follow them, they can't get it through gnosticism alone. Knowledge, although spiritual in nature, is not suitable evidence of spiritual things, because it is still part of this"reality". If one wants to know spiritual things, they first have to be made aware of spirit. This should be a gift from God. See, man can be cut of from all sources of spirituality, except what they a provided beyond their knowledge of it. These are the people who believe in numbers, science (despite obvious errors, and lies), and don't see or experience spiritual things to their knowledge. They believe in nothing despite hundreds of testimonies across various religions. They choose to believe nothing despite people claiming to use Ouija boards, people claiming to have been contacted from this and that entity, and they refuse to believe no matter what they hear. Some chalk it up to illusion. I don't think that's safe. I'm glad I reached out to God. I did it through prayer and reading. I prayed when there was nothing to it. I was just doing it. One time I just started hearing from God. Been a Christian for roughly 10 years. It's good. Everyone should pray when it's the Lord's will. Finding out about these secret things are not as important as having God. According to most God based religions one can die without an understanding of the new world order, and still get into heaven based on God, but they can't get into heaven with all the knowledge in the world of secret societies, but no belief in God. It's important. Jesus is the messiah, fulfilling many of the prophecies of the old testament: would bring light to Galilee, would be pierced, would ride a colt, would have lots thrown for is clothes, would be born of a virgin, would be called Nazarene. There's too many written before him to be coincidental.
Those reading this should set time aside every day, whenever they feel they should, to pray, and talk to God. They should just try loving him, and listening, even when they don't get anything out of it. They should do this even if the idea of it makes them SICK. Hating God isn't going to help anyone. I feel if people give it a constant effort, and don't give up, they'll received God just as I did. Those who give up, thinking there is no God, will not be justified. How will anyone of them justify themselves if God says "I would have talked to you, if only you kept going another month... And why didn't you know that I was already talking to you?" They wont be able to, but hopefully will be forgiven. Scripture petty well says we can't hold our breath on it though. We have to give God the effort sometimes. I'm glad I did:
Paraphrased bible verse: "God rewards those who seek him diligently."
.
.jpg/230px-B.o.B_UIT_2013_(cropped).jpg)
