SDO (NASA's Solar Imager)

The video above is from SDO, a solar imager, designed by NASA. I have a hard time believing this one. Supposedly this is Mercury crossing the sun. What strikes me as standing out is the sheer amount of differences in the clips. Not only this, it seems like some kind of digital re-creation, with Mercury flying only inches from the planet's 3D surface.

At 1:31 I like to crack up. Looks like an epic scene from sci-fi.

SELENE Fake?

 WIKI image

SELENE lunar orbiter, contracted by Mitsubishi, is said to have orbited the moon after a launch by JAXA (The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency.)
 
The satellite, likely named after Selene, goddess of the moon, orbits the moon with a few key pieces of equipment.

Terrain Camera (TC)
Multi-band Imager (MI)
High Definition Television Cameras (HDTV)

Terrain Camera -Returns data for creating digital maps.
Multi-band Imager - A normal camera with near infrared. Great for dark environments.
High Definition Television cameras - A high definition television camera.

So why bother with the post? I came along a live video, streaming old content, which included images from SELENE

I wondered why the video looked fake. It looked massively 3D. The depth seems all off, there are unexplainable creases in the moon when the earth rises, there is a gloss on the moon, which can be seen in other improperly lit/shaded 3D models, and the earth itself looked like a 3D sphere modelled with software such as Maya.

I wondered, how could this be? Maybe it IS a 3D model. Farther research brought me to a video by JAXA themselves that claims the footage was taken with a telophoto lense.

Where is the telophoto lense?

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Kaguya

"The most notable was a high-definition television (HDTV) camera with wide-angle and telephoto lenses and 2.2-megapixel imagers."

It's ON the high definition camera.

These fake looking, in-proper depthed surface videos, that look 3D, with a perfect sphere globe, all glossy and shiny, were taken by a high definition, regular camera?

To Red Sticker Blog, that seems like a load of garbage.

Johhny Dep: Satanic Damien Echols Connection

This video outlines Johnny Depp's connection to Hollywood Satanism, and his role in freeing alleged child killer Damien Echols.

Breaking News: Comet Ping Pong Shooting

http://cdn.scallywagandvagabond.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Edgar-Maddison-Welch.jpg

The plot thickens on the Comet Ping Pong stage. Edgar Maddison Welch enters Comet Ping Pong and threatens workers with a rifle. Fires a single round into the ground. His mission? To save children from the underground tunnels, or find the truth about molestation ring. Information is already surfacing that Welch was a crises actor, and that the whole scenario was staged to frame truthers.

Vigilant Christian warns of a possible psyop.

Isn't it genius?

1) Wikileaks (owned by allegedly controlled Julian Assange) releases emails of Podesta linked to pizza pedophile code.
2) Controlled opposition truthers start sharing images of people, and linking it to FBI codes of pedophile logos. (Where do people find this stuff?)
3) The truth community gets roweled up.
4) Media talks about the conspiracy, and targets fake news sites. Social media gets on board and starts banning fake news sites, YouTube stops monetizing truther videos, and everything we do ranks lower on the net.
5) Truthers release videos about the fake news issue, and how media, and other giants are attacking our content.
6) BAM, ready to go, and ACTOR, of all people, goes to Comet Ping Pong with a gun as a cherry on top.

Media, and government, can now have a field day with going back to war against truthers, and criminalizing their content.

Was the shooting a hoax, was it all enacted by the government? Only time will tell as we're revealed more information.

NASA Fake Videos?

Ever wondered if NASA faked videos? I've watched this earth spin more than a full 180 without seeing a single continent. The video seems to be some kind of live feed of a video from 2013. Simply start the video and pull the scrub back to -2:58:03, or to where you see a good spin of the earth.

There is a section covered in a good bit of cloud, but that can only be one land mass. Try using Google earth to line that cloud cover up with a continent. You will find all continents show land on either side at some point. The only best candidate would be Americas, where you have Pacific and Atlantic Ocean. Even then you HAVE to have Hawaii and Australia come up at some point. Also an ear of South America, or a piece of Africa should be seen.

According to NASA you can see Hawaii from space just fine.

Photo from NASA.

I'm about ready to throw in the towel on this being a CG earth. Where's the land?

To be honest and fair, they show ONE clip at the top of the earth, where we can see what looks like land. Still, it doesn't seem logical that it's the only land visible in more than a full PI rotation of the earth!

Jesus And The 12 Tribes Of Israel

Ever wondered if Jesus was Jewish, or who the 12 tribes of Israel were? In the following post we'll go over some of the details surrounding these questions. Many people argue about lineage, but the scriptures are already clear. Jesus is of the lineage of Israel, and thus in essence, was of the Jewish line when it comes to his mother. This is not of course to say Jesus relates himself to being Jewish, or any other lineage.

The following video sums it up quite well.

Abraham, Jacob, and Joseph

The video talks about a promise to Abraham, saying through him all families of the earth will be blessed.

Gen. 12:1-3
"Now the Lord had said to Abram: Get out of your country, from your family and from your father's house, to a land that I will show you. I will make you a great nation; I will bless you and make your name great; and you shall be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse him who curses you; and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed."

One might wonder, how can one man, who didn't father all people, be a blessing unto the whole world?

The answer comes from Lineage. We find that Abraham was the father of Isaac, whom was the father of Jacob. The lineage continues, but we'll take a bit of a break to say, Jacob becomes the man who wrestled God!

Genesis 32:24-28
²⁴ And Jacob was left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day.
²⁵ And when he saw that he prevailed not against him, he touched the hollow of his thigh; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was out of joint, as he wrestled with him.
²⁶ And he said, Let me go, for the day breaketh. And he said, I will not let thee go, except thou bless me.
²⁷ And he said unto him, What is thy name? And he said, Jacob.
²⁸ And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.

 You might wonder how one can wrestle God. Some would say there is no God, no one has seen God!

The should be urged to look.

On the first page of this YouTube search many people have SEEN God.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=man+sees+jesus

To put it bluntly there has NEVER been a time when man did not hear, see, and interact with God. God has been with his chosen, and will not forsake them.

Imagine being the man who wrestled God. Now, Jacob didn't win, and God injured his leg permanently, but God also blessed him, saying that he will no longer be called Jacob, but Israel. Now Jacob, or rather Israel, had 12 sons, which are the 12 tribes of Israel.

These are the 12 ancient divisions of Jewish lineage.

We can follow this lineage all the way to king David, through Judah (one of the 12 sons), and find his promise from God:

2Sa 7:11  And as since the time that I commanded judges to be over my people Israel, and have caused thee to rest from all thine enemies. Also the LORD telleth thee that he will make thee an house.
2Sa 7:12  And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom.
2Sa 7:13  He shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever.
2Sa 7:14  I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men:
2Sa 7:15  But my mercy shall not depart away from him, as I took it from Saul, whom I put away before thee.
2Sa 7:16  And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever.
2Sa 7:17  According to all these words, and according to all this vision, so did Nathan speak unto David. 

We can continue the lineage from David to Mary, and of Mary we have Jesus.

The great blessing to all families through Abraham!

NASA (Spaceflight Bogus)

A pretty good count of readers checked out my NASA content in the past. Recently, I was sucked into another battle with the powers to be, and decided to dig up more research. There was mixed reviews on all NASA related posts here, so I'm hoping this will rekindle the NASA debate. We'll go over some flight information, photos, and the likelihood of their logic.

This post is highly subjective, but I'll do my best to assert facts, present them, and debate them in a non-liable way, or non-slanderous way, as to be maintain some sense of objective reporting.

First lets study what space is (near vacuum), and what it means to be a vacuum.

From WIKI
Outer space has very low density and pressure, and is the closest physical
approximation of a perfect vacuum. But no vacuum is truly perfect, not even in
interstellar space, where there are still a few hydrogen atoms per cubic meter.

In their own words: "Closest physical approximation of a perfect vacuum." and "a few hydrogen atoms per cubic meter."

So what is a vacuum?

From WIKI
Vacuum is space void of matter.

 A vacuum is basically a weightless void, without any matter (solids, particles, atoms.)

So what is space?

From Wiki
Outer space is an even higher-quality vacuum, with the equivalent of just a few
hydrogen atoms per cubic meter on average.

Again, we are told the only matter in space is a few hydrogen atoms per cubic meter.

Is there friction in space?

From NASA
Friction in Space. Yes, when two surfaces rub together in outer space, there will be
friction. Friction is a surface effect and doesn't depend upon there being air. There
is also a force like air resistance from the very sparse gas in space, but it will be
very, very small, since space is a very good vacuum.

What in space causes friction? Solids, such as asteroids, rocks, to name a few, but not only those, particles, and atoms as well. 

Since space contains ONLY a few hydrogen atoms per cubic meter, we can assume space is about  99.9% perfect vacuum. We're not including what gravitational forces are for the sake of our discussion, but we would assume these to be pretty light in space, away from planetary forces, yet pretty volatile closer to planetary forces.

That definition of space, to me, is enough to cause question.

How could one create similar environments on earth, study them, and create systems capable of performing in them?

Lets examine some crafts starting with suborbital crafts.

What is suborbital space?

This is an area of space, that technically, is within the earth's gravitational field. This means anyone entering into suborbital space, has NOT truly entered the vacuum of space.

Lets take a look at suborbital space crafts.

SpaceShipOne

britannica.com/eb-media/01/124501-004-F8CBF7EC.jpg

Notice the fins and wings. They are important to suborbital crafts because they rely on a need of aerodynamics, due to flying near the surface of earth. Aerodynamics are needed for takeoff and landing.

SpaceShipOne was created in part by the developers of the popular Quake video game series.

There are  a number of photographs of SpaceShipOne. A couple show suborbital flight, but in my mind, they're likely photo-shopped. Where is the photographer?

Here's a new model of a ship, that may not have flown yet.

Lynx

space.com/images/i/000/003/297/original/080326-lynx-flying-02.jpg?interpolation=lanczos-none&downsize=553:*
Another photo-shopped image. Again the ship needs fins, as it will never truly enter the vacuum. It is a suborbital craft.

How does one enter space?

Rockets! How do they differentiate from suborbital crafts? They supposedly enter the vacuum, thus they do not need fins, nor standard aerodynamic technologies.

Rockets rely on thrust to carry them through space.

In many minds, this is where distrust begins. How can thrust be used in zero gravity, in near perfect space, without causing a ship to go headover heels, upside down, or in whatever cardinal, or ordinal, direction  is known to man?

I mean, aren't they relying on a few hydrogen atoms per cubic meter to help them out?

Metaphorically speaking, this sounds like a barn relying on a pebble to keep it steady.

Lets take a look at a modern spacecraft.


Soyuz TMA13 spacecraft

wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/Soyuz_TMA-13_spacecraft_is_transported_by_railcar.jpg

Notice the engines, and stabilizer engines? The tiny swivelling engines give the impression energy expulsion in ordinal directions could stabilize the craft. Crafty enough.

Considering what we know of NASA, this begs the question: Why is it in 2016 they need stabilization engines, yet in the 60's, JUST after tv was invented, they didn't need them at all?

That's what's so funny, in my mind, about the Apollo 11 mission. I'm to believe a pencil can fly in a vaccum, with ONE set of thrusters, that can't move, and do so perfectly?

They can land it, steer it, turn it around, and put it back together again? By what logic!?

How did this:

NASA
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/spacecraft/apollo_csm_diagram.gif

Which supposedly contains this:

NASA
https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5863-69HR.jpg


Become this:

NASA
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/372772main_GPN-2000-001212_full.jpg

Good luck getting someone like me to believe the metamorphosis, and containment, is possible. However, if you can, I'm always willing to listen. 

The duel thruster, non necessary to maneuver, maneuverable, multi-piece detachable, multi-piece menouverable, pencil that launched it all?

Apollo 11

slidesharecdn.com
http://image.slidesharecdn.com/thenasaandtheapolo11-140203154557-phpapp02/95/the-nasa-and-the-apollo-11-13-638.jpg?cb=1391442546

Apollo 11 Engines

extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/saturn-v-rocket-with-f-1-engines-on-the-bottom-640x353.jpg 

Those engines look pretty well mounted to me. Also notice how there are NO stabalizer engines. Meaning these solid engines were designed SO well that they did not send the ship in an eternal spin. Even if they can move a little, I doubt the ability to do a flight like this in perfection was even near possible. Why is it, at the time, everyone else failed, but yet one country magically succeeded?

A single solid engine mounted on the Eagle.

 NASA
nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo11/hires/s69-39011.jpg

How on earth did they figure this out? I try to consider the timeline, and how bogus it sounds.

Where would they test stabilizers? What environment did they test the HUGE ships in, to prove they would perform as intended? How did they manage flight for multiple parts without considerable overhead in the ability to steer such a ship within a near zero force environment such as space?

Lets consider the timeline of space flight up to the 60's.

People constructed spacecrafts capable of  flying in space. They had no environment to study in. They launched a few that exploded in mid-air, sad for the families of lost ones, true. Then, by chance, FINALLY, they got one into space. Lucky them. Thankfully, their first zero test ship, that actually made it into space, could perform just as planned!

Not only did they get it into space. The mounted engines worked perfect, the parts detached, flew where they needed to go, and NOTHING sent the ship into an eternal catastrophic spin.

Is this NASA? A joke?

NASA
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/apollo_1_crew_during_water_egress_training_june_1966_1.jpg