This video goes over the absurd lie being perpetrated by the scientific community. They claim .03 seconds worth of data, gathered by shooting two beams down a hall at mirrors, unaware of the outside world, relates to two black holes that converged over a million years ago, over 9,460,730,472,580,800,000,000 Kilometers away. It's ridiculous.
If I came up to you with a wave drawing, and said, I set up a pencil on the end of a spring loaded vibration detector, and this vibration proves 200 million years ago two dying stars converged, and created a ripple in space time, wouldn't you call me a liar? Don't be afraid to do the same if the science makes just as ludicrous of claims.
The video above goes over what he feels is the absurdity of space time. I certainly can't endorse a majority of his videos, because of their non-christian nature, but this one makes sense to me, and I find it entertaining.
Listen carefully to what he insinuates "The objects are not falling, they are standing still."
This is what science would have us believe, instead of what we observe? Falling objects are standing still.
If they are not falling why do they hit the ground? Consider how the earth's orbit would effect this. If the earth was on downward orbit, falling away from the sun, the objects should never touch the ground.
Thanks science. For the last oh, I don't know, 300 years, you were teaching us objects were falling because of gravity, and now, thanks to BBC, in 2016, you can teach us that because of gravity, objects are standing still! We still love you.
They must salivate with duper's delight.
I'm not sure about the full content of the video above, but the intro makes good points.
Enstien basically said space is a flat cloth, where objects sit, creating indentations in space time.
Place another ball on the cloth, and see what it does to Einstein's theory.
One could say gravitational forces pulling objects away from each other, each time they orbit, causes them to perpetually pull themselves back up the dip. This seems logical, but at the same time, must be impossible.
NASA
If the image above was a real image of space we notice there are billions of objects, all at different heights. Space could not be a cloth with objects sitting on it. It would have to be millions, and billions of cloths, all with objects at different heights, similar heights, and the same height as other objects. How could all these indentations from bodies in space not interfere with each other?
We mentioned the detection of gravitational waves before. Lets go over it one more time, with new information.
"the scientists listened for 20 thousandths of a second"
"the two objects had begun by circling each other 30 times a second"
"By the end of the 20 millisecond snatch of data, the two had accelerated
to 250 times a second before the final collision..."
That's right, in less than .03 seconds, 9,460,730,472,580,800,000,000 Kilometers away they knew their wave was two black holes 35 times the mass of the sun. They knew how many times they circled each other, and exactly how fast. They didn't even need binoculars! We'll teach you how they figured it out.
What they want us to believe is sending laser beams down tubes at a mirror, which bounces them back, will detect gravitational waves some several trillion miles away. Not only does it detect waves 1.3 billion light years away, these genius oracles can tell us EXACTLY what causes the wave.
Who needs binoculars or a telescope when you got these MacGyvers with a ball point pen, a laser beam, some bubble gum, and a mirror.
For one thing, laser beams travelling down tubes don't know outer space exists. Come on.
It looks as fake as it sounds! Imagine believing beams travelling in tubes, unaware of the outside world, will detect waves from that distance, and somehow, these geniuses know the exact cause.
Einstein invents the theory of relativity in the early 1900's. By the 60's scientists conveniently dream up LIGO. By 2015 they have it built. By 2016, just one year later, they have their gravitational wave! Something smells fishy to me.
The BBC video above is to prove heavy and light objects fall at the same time in a vacuum. This is a similar condition to outer space, except of course with gravity. We would have to believe BBC, and expect the footage to be original, and not some kind of doctored propaganda campaign.
You may have noticed the height of the drop in the video above is not very high.
I did catch an anomaly in the footage. Watch closely at 3:24. You will see the frame freeze, and hitch, when the host is pointing at the computer screen. If they are watching objects free fall, and did not touch the footage, why would this happen? The best explanation would be a glitch in their own software while viewing for the BBC camera.
The video above proves beyond a shadow of a doubt larger objects fall at greater speeds here on earth. Notice that the height at which the objects were dropped is much higher than in the first video. This will be crucial to our understanding of the BBC footage, considering the information to follow.
Next we see video where objects may land at same time from short distances.
The guy above pushes the typical scientific idea that lighter and heavier objects fall at the same time.
This video also drops items from a low height, while saying they have the same acceleration.
Who brought us this principal? Galileo.
We find this principal reinforced in the article below, and also an explanation as to why heavier objects seem to fall faster.
"However, in the real world, we have things like air resistance, which is why sometimes heavy things do fall faster."
Eric Dubay holds fast to the idea the earth is flat and that there is no such force as gravity. He states buoyancy is the cause of all objects falling and rising. A denser object will fall faster, because it is heavier. Lighter objects fall slower, because they are lighter. Helium floats because it is lighter than air.
Funny enough, this is the exact explanation given by science.
A balloon will float to the surface of water, because it is lighter than water. Helium will float because it is lighter than air. - paraphrased information.
We see through common science, more often than not, that buoyancy is the answer.
Common to those who believe in gravity is that all objects have gravity. The truth from science is that all objects are not floating, they are
falling through space. Orbital bodies are falling around each other. Our understanding of objects having mass means space itself is NOT, and never will be, zero gravity. According to science this gravity is caused by mass. Particles have mass. Space, not being a perfect vacuum, has particles.
This proves the BBC propaganda video to be a fraudulent hoax.
The man says "It's a miracle." Now I will prove why they are lying, and it is no miracle.
1) It's impossible to pump out all the air from their chamber.
2) They have not removed particle mass, which must exist in every particle in the chamber.
3) They only dropped the objects from a few meters, thus not being effective, and setting grounds for their bias.
4) We have proved that restrictions, such as air, particles, will slow falling objects.
Because of what we proved, we KNOW if they dropped the objects from a greater height, they would not have landed at the same time. It's impossible. These guys are liars.
I left this comment, which will likely disappear:
I'm not trying to disprove gravity, but shed light on lies, and false science. It's funny that what they're trying to prove, the conditions they're trying to invent to prove it, don't even exist. They don't even exist in outer space, where they are trying to prove it for! It's all ludicrous.
This isn't to say their science is, or isn't, off by miles. It does show that they are willing to lie, and lie blatantly. It also proves they are wrong, and theories they treat as Godly, such as Newtons laws, are mostly based on a modal that does not, and will not exist.
How wrong they are, we may never know.
For fun, lets explore some interesting words from Nichola Testla, which were publicized in a paper.
He found
time while surveying his own past to express his sharp disagreement with
the theories of Prof. Albert Einstein. He announced that the theory of
relativity is "a mass of error and deceptive ideas and opposed to common
sense," and that "not a single one of the relativity propositions has
been proved."
"Brian Rohrbough has said he believes his son was shot accidentally by a Denver police officer, not by Eric Harris or Dylan Klebold, the two student gunmen blamed for the 1999 shooting spree."
Four shooters in the video above. The description on that video is interesting.
The video above covers Columbine shooting footage. School cameras allegedly show mussel flashes after Eric and Dylan's alleged suicide at 12:08PM.
Alleged shooting victim turned whistle blower.
The video above is hard to verify. The first stories from Mark are him telling about his shooting which happened in a doorway just inside the school. He makes no mention of a shooter on the roof, while in the hospital. It's hard to understand where he found time to see this shooter.
The message above is from Mark's mother. Apparently allegations of Sodomy rape concerning a sheriff and the kids has surfaced.
The following site is dedicated to families seeking answers concerning Columbine.
Eric Dubay is dubious with false religion, but makes an interesting claim in the video above. Also, with great thanks from me, has at least mentioned biblical hope in this video. We place it in the conspiracy section, as we are still looking into it, and certainly don't have the necessary proof to validate his claims.
Outstandingly the video states all real bones are hidden behind vaults, and no independent researcher has ever seen a real dinosaur bone.
The following article describes an alleged find of Sophie, the most intact stegosaurus ever found. Interestingly it's name parallels that of a false God, Sophia.
Why are bones being found in recent time, and by mass, during the craze of evolution? Since people had been going back and forth on the earth for thousands of years, we would assume bones would have been discovered long ago.
Consider Sophie, above, being found in Red Canyon Ranch, Wyoming, in 2003. There have been people in America over 300 years, and Wyoming had a population of a half a million in 2015. In defence of possibilities, Red Canyon is rather large, and sparsely populated.
The Chinese have been recording "dragon bones" for a very long time. Is it possible dragon bones unearthed in ancient China were actually dinosaur bones? Seems highly plausible.
Job 40:17 Its tail sways like a cedar; the sinews of its thighs are close.
Eric makes the claim that complete dinosaurs have not been found, which is true, but near complete dinosaurs have been allegedly found.
Zhenyuanlong Suni
Discovered in Liaoning, China. The problem is, the creature above is bird type, and reconstructed like so:
If dinosaurs were a hoax, the find above is of the type bird. It may not even be able to be placed in a dinosaur category, for obvious reasons.
Sadly, a biblical verse, along with science has done little to disprove a hoax. Even if strange birds did exist, and large creatures, it doesn't prove, or disprove, dinosaurs in the extent we are taught of them.
We'll be doing more evidence digging, and searching for clues. Feel free to let us know if you have any other information on this matter. Thanks for reading.
I don't subscribe to the entire flat earth theory, or do I? Who knows, but this video certainly raises some good questions. If there are so many satellites in space, how the heck does the ISS avoid them? One would think satellites make ISS missions impossible, or incredibly dangerous. Check out the video for more details.
