I've been thinking of some reasons of why we shouldn't accept the implantable chip when it comes out. Besides the normal biblical reasons, and the possibility of them being true, there must be a couple of others. There has to be something beyond the prospect of hell forever, fire, torment, and festering boils that might convince the average human being that it might not be a good idea, because you know, that might not be enough. That is if it's all true.
They say they can put a GPS in it so people can find their kids. Do you think that's really safe? Ransom was bad enough, but with the chip, there's no way anyone's going to get their kid back in one piece... Literally. Think some thug is going to think twice about lopping some kid's hand off to lose a tracker? That hand will hit the ground before they hit the back seat. Still sound like it will keep kids safe?
We have to remember that thieves are just as technologically advanced as the rest of society. They're called hackers, and they know how to abuse some of the most robust systems devised. Banks would like us to think no one can hack into their systems, or that chip readers couldn't be invented, but I bet the truth is far different. Right now a business man has the opportunity to walk into the bank at gun point, hoping the criminal wont shoot him when the money is withdrawn. With a chip inserted he has to worry about losing his hand, and if it's in his forehead, well, he can kiss his 5'oclock goodbye.
The chip isn't as safe as it's cracked up to be. It's pushed as a great innovation on the horizon that will protect, and ensure man's safety, but is that the truth? Other than hell and dismemberment to worry about, there's also the enslavement matter. Everyone chipped with little to no privacy. Say goodbye to people handing their kids a loonie, and so long left hand. It's all coming to a close now.
Keep your mind sharp, and you're hands attached.
Red Sticker Blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment