While browsing for answers in this space dilemma, I was able to catch the European Space Agency in a lie. We'll cover the footage above for inconsistencies to prove space agencies are not afraid to present false footage, to convince people of lies. I'm just not sure what the lie is, or if we'll ever get to the bottom of it.
1:41 the left hand footage is above clouds. On the right side there isn't a single cloud in sight.
1:52 we are still very high above clouds, with no clouds on the right.
1:58 the left side footage jerks oddly, and resumes to a strange, uneven, speed of climb.
2:13 on the right we see the smoke creates a wave inconsistent of any activity on the left.
2:16 Interestingly the fuel tanks have already started jettisoning on the right. Not on the left.
2:18 pause. Fuel tanks on left facing rocket, but on the right they have fallen away, and are facing outward. Near this time, or only seconds before, you will see the sky change color on the right. This is when the sync problems really show.
3:18 tons of blue water and a few white clouds.
3:44 at alleged satellite launch we have a complete white out. Nothing but clouds.
Watch to where the rocket on the left is clearly in space. On the right it is not in space. You see it no higher than where an airplane might be. Sorry guys, but the footage does not line up, and that thing is not in space.
One last thing:
That satellite is clearly visible, yet the other 100, 000 alleged satellites are nowhere in sight. Neither a single piece of space debris?
What are they hiding? Is anything beyond low earth orbit possible?
The best part? They are launching a satellite! Of all footage to fake and create inconsistencies in
Converging black holes that prove ripples in space time. That's what the image above was used for. To prove Einstein was correct, that space (an area) was converged with time (a linear thing) to create fabrics that planets sit upon.
The above image is LIGO, the magic station that discovered our black holes. LIGO said, upon less than 2% of a second worth of data, that black holes converged over 1.3 light years away. That's 9 with a lot of zeroes kms. Not only this, the convergence happened 1.4 billion years ago. Each was 14 times the mass of the sun.
Sites like Space can't wait to tell people all about it, and look, LIGO does it again!
Here is the problem I have with this.
Humans have a selective hearing range. We cannot hear less than a certain frequency, or higher than a certain frequency. We also cannot hear electromagnetic waves. This is a good thing. Radio waves are roughly 13-30 Hz. We cannot hear those, or else we would hear our local stations while walking around. No need to tune in. Wifi is in the range of 3-5 Ghz, and we can't hear that. Which may not be such a bad idea, considering some of the world's browsing habits. However, Ligo is different.
Here is the frequency of our ancient "converging black holes."
LIGO, is a seismometer. This means LIGO reads vibrations. That's right, it doesn't matter what frequency range the vibrations are in, all that really matters is that there is a vibration.
From their own site:
"LIGO is essentially a giant seismometer capable of sensing vibrations
from traffic on nearby roads, weather patterns on the other side of the
continent, staff biking alongside detector arms, ocean waves crashing on
shores hundreds of miles away, and of course nearly every significant
earthquake on the planet."
Without isolating their equipment LIGO can hear an earth quake anywhere on earth.
To show you they did isolate equipment, and that I'm being subjective, you are free to view the page
Why do I believe isolation doesn't matter? No matter how much they isolate the equipment to pick up vibrations, it's still meant to pick up vibrations. That's what it does. Consider putting a cone on a seismometer, or earth quake detector. It may not detect earth quakes in the local area anymore, but it's going to detect them somewhere. Wherever you point the machine.
Lets re-examine our vibrations.
Our vibrations are between the frequency of 32Hz and over 512hz. Since we seem to be talking in the terms of vibration, and not electromagnetic frequency we can assume these vibrations can come from anything. Literally, anything.
Remember our quote from LIGO, saying they can pick up traffic, earth quakes everywhere, and so forth.
Once aimed in their general direction, they are under the exact same restrictions.
"LIGO is essentially a giant seismometer capable of sensing vibrations
from traffic on nearby roads, weather patterns on the other side of the
continent, staff biking alongside detector arms, ocean waves crashing on
shores hundreds of miles away, and of course nearly every significant
earthquake on the planet."
We can assume once aimed out into space they could pick up every meteor whizzing by, every mass crashing into another, every explosion, star solar flare, converging stars, super novas, so on, and so forth.
Despite this, LIGO is quick to tell us black holes converged. Why? Because this is their only purpose. They were built for no other reason. They were built to prove Einstein right. That's all, that's it.
Above is our favorite BBC footage. The one where Brian Cox tells us falling objects are not falling, but rather, they are standing still.
The video below is a rocket launch, that may just bring the entire theory into question. Notice when the bottom is jettisoned the smaller piece vanishes in seconds, while the bigger piece lingers for a long while.
In the video below Brian Cox tells us about electrons.
Electrons in our hand are responsible for not allowing an apple to go through our hand. Right, the video is older, but one minute gravity pulled objects down, the next minute objects are not pulling down, but rather they are standing still. Standing still, despite falling. They can't make up their minds.
What are they going to teach us about electrons now? Obviously electrons are no longer needed to keep non-falling density from going through our solid flesh.
Above is how gravity works. Well, used to work. Now when you jump you wont be falling back to earth. Not according to Brian Cox, anyway. NASA is there too, with him. Yes, now when NASA launches a ship, it's engines are no longer propelling it away from the earth, the earth orbiting away gives it the graceful look of flying. They'll wait for the moon to orbit around and land under their non-falling craft.
"Did you hear that chirp, 1/100 of a second ago?"
"Yes, why I yes I did. That son, is the sound of two converging black holes over 2 million years ago, over 9 gazillion km away. It all happened on June 15th, about mid-day. Why, I do believe it was raining that day. I can tell by the pitch and frequency. I also believe ice is forming on Mars. Yes, most certainly ice, on the northern pole."
Brian Mullin has some pretty interesting thoughts in the video above. It made me wonder, and It clicks with some prior discoveries. I'm not endorsing it all, but the water bit is extremely interesting.
In the video above you will hear the first splash around 4 seconds, the springy thing is reacting to the pass through. Then there is a popping noise. This is nowhere near the end. There are several times I noticed bubbles. Also just after 16 seconds there is a watery shimmer of light. Then amazingly, at 2:16 the springy thing reacts to the pass through again. Back to earth. Soon after we get the loud water, as if we are falling through a fish tank. After this, the wind, as we pass back into the atmosphere.
That bubble at 12 seconds passes right up the screen.
That 16 second bubble passes down to the right.
The video above is cool. Very professional quality. Just after 2:45 we hear the first faint splash. At close to 4:55 we have a very loud splash on return.
The video above is really cool. After about 40 seconds we pass through a sea of water. Sadly it's official videos from space, so the whole thing is hard to trust. The entry is cut short. GoPro's launch does the same thing. As if some are being very selective with footage. Notice at 1:42 a small piece falls away faster than the bottom of the rocket. It's long gone. Kind of makes BBCs feather footage with NASA suspect.
The video above is the best. I saved it for last. The whole time they call this "splash down." Notice we are above the clouds. In a couple of seconds you will experience the waters being passed through. It's a literal breaking of something, and then a shower. NASA tries to hide the truth. "We are back on earth." They are most certainly still above the clouds.
Now, something very interesting to think about.
Genisis 1:7
7God made the expanse, and separated the waters which were below the expanse from the waters which were above the expanse; and it was so.
The Nile, a beautiful, and strange river. Okay, it might not be strange, but it's certainly strange to think about, when contemplating the globe of the earth.
It's a north flowing river, which stretches nearly the expanse of the entire continent. Since Africa is so large, it has heavy exposure to Earth's curvature. More than northern Canada to South America.
Think about being a few inches from the bottom of a giant sphere, and walking towards the top. If you did not have gravity at the center point, you would fall off. Suction cups would be needed to continue.
Gravity at center point is also what we actually have in our universe. This is the explanation of why people on the bottom of earth do not fall off. Gravity is at the core of the planet, and down is always the center. This is smart, but when we look at how a globe really is, and how it must function, we see this does not really solve our river problem.
Water level is just that, water level. Raise land up from it, and we have earth. Different amounts of earth above the water creates hills, and height. Sure, center point gravity would hold us, and the water to the earth, but what dictates up and down? Would water still be able to run up the curve with center point gravity? Logically we would have to think, no. Gravity pulls the water to the center of the sphere, but nothing short of a pump is going to pull it up towards the north pole.
Lets look at some images:
This is Africa laid on its side. We are near the base of the Nile, and can see clearly that it MUST run up curvature. Is our center point of gravity the truth, or a bandaid?
Even zoomed in the curvature is there. It cannot be denied. Why? Because that is the nature of a sphere. No curvature, no sphere. Also note the globe is not turned upright here.
We do see, by running the mouse over the land region of the Nile that land lowers to sea level there, with some strange fluctuating numbers. We'll call that a software problem, or strange mouse placement, else water really is running up hill.
What does make sense is if Africa was on a flat plane, and that portion was lower, or bent down a little. Like less putty used on that portion, and it were bent a bit. No curvature, just water running down hill.
Wiki's satellite map is interesting. It's a "composite image", so either drawn, or stitched from satellite data. It does not support a sphere, as is, but it certainly does support a kind of land mass as proposed. The problem is, composite. It could mean anything from stitched satellite data, to drawn by hand with a satellite's perspective in mind.
Here is my best remake from Google Earth. Not quite similar, and very hard to base anything off.
That was fun, now lets get stark raving sober, and contemplate a "logical" explanation based on current scientific modal. If all the land in Africa was high above sea level, and that area slowly tapered down, with gravity at center, would that defy the curvature, with north pole upward?
I'm no flat earther, and certainly not a physicist. I simply look for theories, and ways to break the globe. I don't want anyone deceived by information I bring forth, so feel free to explore and study as I do.
Above is a bit of a bonus video. I don't subscribe to religious claims beyond simple Christianity, so I can't stand behind any pseudo catholic ideas. I also haven't decided if the guy above is genuine, deceived, or committed to shilling of any kind. It has been warned about in flat earth, due to some of the activity in mainstream, but considering all the angles of shillery separating wheat from chaff is difficult.
Here is another GoPro launch with slightly different results. They claim to reach 120,000km. Interesting.
Here is a mere 10,000km in Google Earth. Google earth makes no claim to its accuracy, but as we can see nearly the entire planet is visible, as apposed to GoPro's single land mass.
The Nile river is a massive north running river. It's huge. Wiki tells us that it runs from Tanzania all the way up to Egypt. The problem Eric Dubay (God save his soul) suggests is that this defies a globe. The northern part of Africa is on one side of the curvature, and the southern side is below the other side of the curvature.
This is the logical tilt needed, heeding no scientific explanation to get the Nile, and Africa upside down, to have it all running in that direction. The problem is, this is NOT the way the world is. The south pole, would melt, and trade places with Australia.
The image above accurately depicts the way the world is. There's no way around it. The Nile defies curvature.
It's gotta be the moon. They told us the moon controls tides, right? Nope, sorry. The logical explanation is not the moon. After all, rivers have to run day and night, from source to source. What is the logical explanation? Give up? Location on a globe, due to gravity, does not control where land is tilted. Well, this sounds nice to laymen. However, we just looked at a map and proved the Nile spans the curve.
Want to make things a little more confusing? America has MANY south running rivers, South America south running rivers, and Canada many north running rivers.
Does this disprove a globe? No, of course not, but it does make my head hurt. At best it disproves logic, and proves we don't live in a Godless world, where God himself is void of controlling some things all on his own.
Any logical answers would be greatly appreciated. Not to say God isn't logic, of course.
When searching the EMU(Electro Magnetic Universe) I found some interesting information. I don't subscribe to this theory as a complete, or conclusive modal, but it is interesting. It's fun to look through, considering some of the flaws we see in our current understanding. I was faced with this question, and decided to research.
Note - This is only one of many opposing ideas, and only one experiment.
Breaking The EMU
According to the Electric Universe Model, Neutrinos have not been found; but we have been detecting them for years and they match the predictive models perfectly. The Electric Universe Model fails this test. - Comment by Aristotle Stagirus.
Lets start our research by getting a basic grasp on what the heck a neutrino is.
The majority of neutrinos in the vicinity of the Earth are from nuclear reactions in the Sun. About 65 billion (6.5×1010) solar neutrinos per second pass through every square centimeter perpendicular to the direction of the Sun in the region of the Earth.[11][12]
They come from the sun. Another source states over a trillion will pass through a human in their lifetime.
A whopping tens of thousands of neutrinos are passing
through your body every second.
There are about 330 million of
these neutrinos per m3
Wow, you wouldn't think you would have to try looking very hard to find one of those.
The first experiment to attempt to detect electron neutrinos from the sun was conducted
by a detector in the bottom of the Homestake mine in South Dakoda in 1968.
Strange place to look for neutrinos. I mean, if there are billions on the surface of the earth, and this is the FIRST time you were looking for them, you wouldn't think you would start underground. Ah, who cares, right? That's as good as place as any.
Homestake Expirment
Detect neutrinos from the sun for the first time several miles underground.
Propose Argon-37 recipe
perchloroethylene, common dry cleaning fluid, is poured into a tub of some kind. This is needed as it's high in chlorine and chlorine-37 is needed.
Our magic neutrino particle will interact with the chlorine-37 atom to transform into a radioactive argon-37.
We'll know for sure our magic particle exists because the neutron creates it with chlorine-37 in our dry cleaning fluid.
Use helium every several weeks to collect the argon-37.
Wait. In order to trust the experiment, we have to assume the elusive million/mph electron neutrino exists, and should see if argon-37 can be found anywhere else.
WIKI
Radioactive 37Ar is a synthetic radionuclide that is created from the neutron capture by 40Ca followed by an alpha particle emission as a result of subsurface nuclear explosions.
Apparently we can form recipe #2 from our newly deducted information.
Argon Recipe #2
A common neutron interacts with Calcium-40.
We then interact with an alpha particle emission.
Alpha particles consist of two protons and two neutrons bound together into a particle identical to a helium nucleus.
Helium!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_particle
Wait a minute. Isn't helium used in the tanks every two weeks, to allegedly collect the produced Argon-37?
What about Calcium-40 what creates that?
Potassium-40 is a rare example of an isotope that undergoes all three types of beta decay. About 89.28% of the time, it decays to calcium-40.
Interesting Potassium-40.
Pottasium-40
Up 0.012% (120 ppm) of the total amount of potassium found in nature.
Humans exert pottasium-40 as one of our most abundant radioactive waste products. Nearly every time we breath it contains pottasium-40.
Pottasium-40 is found in common rocks.
Problem
They were trying to prove a particle existed by using a liquid combination with helium, which would have created argon-37 from any human contamination!
Human contamination possibilities during construction.
Swimming in the water shield.
Swimming in eductors.
Conclusion
We can trust their "first time" experiment to find these abundant sun particles deep underground, or consider the fact that every chemical they chose, and the conditions they were in, was conveniently creating the argon-37 they needed to prove their particle the whole time.
