The Nile, a beautiful, and strange river. Okay, it might not be strange, but it's certainly strange to think about, when contemplating the globe of the earth.
It flows north through Tanzania, Lake Victoria, Uganda and South Sudan.
- Wikipedia
It's a north flowing river, which stretches nearly the expanse of the entire continent. Since Africa is so large, it has heavy exposure to Earth's curvature. More than northern Canada to South America.
Think about being a few inches from the bottom of a giant sphere, and walking towards the top. If you did not have gravity at the center point, you would fall off. Suction cups would be needed to continue.
Gravity at center point is also what we actually have in our universe. This is the explanation of why people on the bottom of earth do not fall off. Gravity is at the core of the planet, and down is always the center. This is smart, but when we look at how a globe really is, and how it must function, we see this does not really solve our river problem.
Water level is just that, water level. Raise land up from it, and we have earth. Different amounts of earth above the water creates hills, and height. Sure, center point gravity would hold us, and the water to the earth, but what dictates up and down? Would water still be able to run up the curve with center point gravity? Logically we would have to think, no. Gravity pulls the water to the center of the sphere, but nothing short of a pump is going to pull it up towards the north pole.
Lets look at some images:
This is Africa laid on its side. We are near the base of the Nile, and can see clearly that it MUST run up curvature. Is our center point of gravity the truth, or a bandaid?
Even zoomed in the curvature is there. It cannot be denied. Why? Because that is the nature of a sphere. No curvature, no sphere. Also note the globe is not turned upright here.
We do see, by running the mouse over the land region of the Nile that land lowers to sea level there, with some strange fluctuating numbers. We'll call that a software problem, or strange mouse placement, else water really is running up hill.
What does make sense is if Africa was on a flat plane, and that portion was lower, or bent down a little. Like less putty used on that portion, and it were bent a bit. No curvature, just water running down hill.
Wiki's satellite map is interesting. It's a "composite image", so either drawn, or stitched from satellite data. It does not support a sphere, as is, but it certainly does support a kind of land mass as proposed. The problem is, composite. It could mean anything from stitched satellite data, to drawn by hand with a satellite's perspective in mind.
Here is my best remake from Google Earth. Not quite similar, and very hard to base anything off.
That was fun, now lets get stark raving sober, and contemplate a "logical" explanation based on current scientific modal. If all the land in Africa was high above sea level, and that area slowly tapered down, with gravity at center, would that defy the curvature, with north pole upward?
I'm no flat earther, and certainly not a physicist. I simply look for theories, and ways to break the globe. I don't want anyone deceived by information I bring forth, so feel free to explore and study as I do.
Above is a bit of a bonus video. I don't subscribe to religious claims beyond simple Christianity, so I can't stand behind any pseudo catholic ideas. I also haven't decided if the guy above is genuine, deceived, or committed to shilling of any kind. It has been warned about in flat earth, due to some of the activity in mainstream, but considering all the angles of shillery separating wheat from chaff is difficult.
Here is another GoPro launch with slightly different results. They claim to reach 120,000km. Interesting.
Here is a mere 10,000km in Google Earth. Google earth makes no claim to its accuracy, but as we can see nearly the entire planet is visible, as apposed to GoPro's single land mass.
I'll explore this more. Thanks for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment